• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较有无窦道的人工关节置换术后感染患者清创、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)治疗的成功率。

Comparison of the success rate after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic joint infection among patients with or without a sinus tract.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Fourth Clinical College of Peking University, No.31 Xinjiekou East Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100039, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Oct 21;22(1):895. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04756-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-021-04756-x
PMID:34674675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8532350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The relevance between the presence of a sinus tract and the failure risk after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip or knee arthroplasty is still unclear. This study aimed to compare the success rate of DAIR between patients with or without a sinus tract and to explore the possible risk factors for failure after DAIR in patients with a sinus tract.

METHODS

Consecutive DAIR cases for PJI after hip or knee arthroplasty between January 2009 and June 2019 with a minimum 1-year follow-up in two tertiary joint arthroplasty centers were included. Patients were classified into the sinus tract group and the non-sinus tract group according to the presence of a sinus tract. The success rate after DAIR were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Potential risk factors for failure in the sinus group were also explored.

RESULTS

One hundred seven patients were included. At a median 4.4 years of follow-up, 19 of 52 (36.5%) cases failed in the sinus tract group, while 15 of 55 (27.3%) cases failed in the non-sinus tract group. The 1-year and 5-year cumulative success rates were 71.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.8-84.6%) and 56.8% (95% CI: 42.6-75.7%) in the sinus tract group, respectively, which were similar to the counterparts in the non-sinus tract group (P = 0.214). Among patients with a sinus tract, DAIR with the exchange of modular components showed a higher success rate (75.8% versus 47.4%, P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a sinus tract does not affect the success rate of DAIR. Modular component exchange in DAIR was proposed for patients with a sinus tract for an improved infection control rate.

摘要

背景

髋关节或膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染(PJI)清创、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)后窦道的存在与失败风险之间的相关性尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较有窦道和无窦道患者 DAIR 的成功率,并探讨窦道患者 DAIR 后失败的可能危险因素。

方法

纳入 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月在两家三级关节置换中心行髋关节或膝关节置换术后 PJI 行 DAIR 治疗且至少随访 1 年的连续病例。根据窦道的存在,将患者分为窦道组和非窦道组。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析比较 DAIR 后的成功率。还探讨了窦道组失败的潜在危险因素。

结果

共纳入 107 例患者。在中位数为 4.4 年的随访中,窦道组 52 例中有 19 例(36.5%)失败,而非窦道组 55 例中有 15 例(27.3%)失败。窦道组的 1 年和 5 年累积成功率分别为 71.2%(95%置信区间[CI]:59.8-84.6%)和 56.8%(95% CI:42.6-75.7%),与非窦道组相似(P=0.214)。在有窦道的患者中,模块化组件的 DAIR 置换显示出更高的成功率(75.8%比 47.4%,P=0.038)。

结论

窦道的存在并不影响 DAIR 的成功率。对于有窦道的患者,建议在 DAIR 中更换模块化组件,以提高感染控制率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/8532350/d142ffb96a90/12891_2021_4756_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/8532350/e1b7f6ddfb8a/12891_2021_4756_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/8532350/bb8ac85aa755/12891_2021_4756_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/8532350/d142ffb96a90/12891_2021_4756_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/8532350/e1b7f6ddfb8a/12891_2021_4756_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/8532350/bb8ac85aa755/12891_2021_4756_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/8532350/d142ffb96a90/12891_2021_4756_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the success rate after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic joint infection among patients with or without a sinus tract.比较有无窦道的人工关节置换术后感染患者清创、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)治疗的成功率。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Oct 21;22(1):895. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04756-x.
2
Functional outcome of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention in periprosthetic joint infection involving the hip: a case-control study.清创、抗生素治疗及保留植入物治疗髋关节假体周围感染的功能结局:一项病例对照研究
Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):614-622. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0562.R2.
3
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention after revision arthroplasty : antibiotic mismatch, timing, and repeated DAIR associated with poor outcome.翻修术后清创、抗生素和植入物保留:抗生素不匹配、时机和重复的 DAIR 与不良结局相关。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Apr;104-B(4):464-471. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B4.BJJ-2021-1264.R1.
4
Acceptable Success Rate in Patients With Periprosthetic Knee Joint Infection Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention.保肢清创术联合抗生素治疗治疗人工膝关节置换术后感染的可接受成功率。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2):365-368. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.088. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
5
Outcome Following Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection-An 18-Year Experience.髋关节假体周围感染清创、抗生素治疗及植入物保留后的结果——18年经验
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2248-2255. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.066. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
Outcomes and risk factors for failure after débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for elbow periprosthetic joint infection.肘关节假体周围感染清创、抗生素治疗及植入物保留术后失败的结局与危险因素
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Mar;32(3):475-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.11.009. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
7
The outcomes of acute periprosthetic joint infection following unicompartmental knee replacement managed with early debridement, Antibiotics, and implant retention.单髁膝关节置换术后早期清创术、抗生素治疗和保留假体治疗急性假体周围关节感染的结果。
Knee. 2024 Mar;47:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.12.001. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
8
[Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Infections with DAIR (Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention) - Success Rate and Risk Factors of Failure].[采用清创、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)治疗急性人工关节周围感染——成功率及失败风险因素]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(3):181-187.
9
Outcome of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention With Modular Component Exchange in Acute Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infections.清创术、抗生素和模块化组件更换保留在急性无培养阳性假体周围关节感染中的应用结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Mar;36(3):1087-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.065. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
10
Lower Rates of Reoperation Following Partial or Complete Revision Arthroplasty Compared to Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Early Postoperative and Acute Hematogenous Periprosthetic Hip Infection.与清创、抗生素治疗及保留植入物治疗早期术后和急性血源性人工髋关节感染相比,部分或完全翻修关节成形术后的再次手术率较低。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9):2346-2351. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.054. Epub 2024 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
One-year success after debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention for acute hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective cohort study of 62 patients.清创、抗生素治疗及保留植入物治疗急性髋膝关节假体周围感染后的一年成功率:一项对62例患者的回顾性队列研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jul 22;35(1):316. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04438-7.
2
Debridement, antimicrobial therapy, and implant retention (DAIR) as curative strategy for acute periprosthetic hip and knee infections: a position paper of the European Bone & Joint Infection Society (EBJIS).清创、抗菌治疗及植入物保留(DAIR)作为急性人工髋关节和膝关节感染的治疗策略:欧洲骨与关节感染学会(EBJIS)立场文件
J Bone Jt Infect. 2025 Apr 1;10(2):101-138. doi: 10.5194/jbji-10-101-2025. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome of Irrigation and Debridement With Topical Antibiotics Delivery for the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Occurring Within 3 Months Since the Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.初次全关节置换术后 3 个月内发生的假体周围关节感染采用局部抗生素递送灌洗清创术治疗的效果。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 May;36(5):1765-1771. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.11.033. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
2
The etiology of revision total hip arthroplasty: current trends in a retrospective survey of 3450 cases.翻修全髋关节置换术的病因:3450 例回顾性调查中的当前趋势。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Sep;140(9):1265-1273. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03514-3. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
3
Periprosthetic hip infection: Current concepts and the Wrightington experience.人工髋关节周围感染:当前概念及怀廷顿医院的经验
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jul 28;55:102509. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102509. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Antiseptics' Concentration, Combination, and Exposure Time on Bacterial and Fungal Biofilm Eradication.防腐剂浓度、组合及暴露时间对细菌和真菌生物膜根除的影响
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jul 23;28:101468. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101468. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Evaluating ChatGPT responses to frequently asked patient questions regarding periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty.评估ChatGPT对全髋关节和膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染常见患者问题的回答。
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 9;10:20552076241272620. doi: 10.1177/20552076241272620. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Changing the definition of treatment success alters treatment outcomes in periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改变治疗成功的定义会改变人工关节感染的治疗结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2024 Apr 26;9(2):127-136. doi: 10.5194/jbji-9-127-2024. eCollection 2024.
7
Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Treatment of Early Infections after Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.清创、抗生素与植入物保留:全膝关节置换翻修术后早期感染治疗策略的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 31;12(15):5026. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155026.
8
Principles of mechanical and chemical debridement with implant retention.保留植入物的机械清创和化学清创原则。
Arthroplasty. 2023 Apr 6;5(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00170-x.
2020 Frank Stinchfield Award: Identifying who will fail following irrigation and debridement for prosthetic joint infection.
2020 年弗兰克·斯廷奇菲尔德奖:识别哪些患者在接受关节假体感染清创灌洗术后会失败。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul;102-B(7_Supple_B):11-19. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1628.R1.
4
Clinical Characteristics, Etiology, and Initial Management Strategy of Newly Diagnosed Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Multicenter, Prospective Observational Cohort Study of 783 Patients.新诊断的人工关节周围感染的临床特征、病因及初始治疗策略:一项对783例患者的多中心、前瞻性观察队列研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 May 14;7(5):ofaa068. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa068. eCollection 2020 May.
5
Utilization of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty Over a Decade in the United States.美国超过十年时间内全关节置换术后感染的清创术、抗生素和植入物保留的利用情况。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Aug;35(8):2210-2216. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.029. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
6
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for periprosthetic knee infections: a pooling analysis of 1266 cases.人工膝关节周围感染的清创、抗生素治疗及植入物保留:1266例病例的汇总分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Nov 12;14(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1378-4.
7
Outcome of Revision Surgery for Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results of 3 Surgical Strategies.全膝关节置换术后感染翻修手术的结果:三种手术策略的结果
JBJS Rev. 2019 Jun;7(6):e4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00084.
8
Increased Failure After Irrigation and Debridement for Acute Hematogenous Periprosthetic Joint Infection.冲洗和清创术治疗急性血源性人工关节假体感染后的失败率增加。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Apr 17;101(8):696-703. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00381.
9
Infection triples the cost of a primary joint arthroplasty.感染会使初次关节置换手术的成本增加两倍。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2019 May;51(5):348-355. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2019.1572219. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
10
The Presence of Sinus Tract Adversely Affects the Outcome of Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections.窦道的存在会对人工关节周围感染治疗的结果产生不利影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1227-1232.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.040. Epub 2019 Feb 25.