• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Why do doctors seek peer support? A qualitative interview study.医生为什么寻求同行支持?一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 21;11(10):e048732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048732.
2
Understanding peer support: a qualitative interview study of doctors one year after seeking support.理解同伴支持:寻求支持一年后医生的定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09312-y.
3
What are the barriers and facilitators to seeking help for mental health in NHS doctors: a systematic review and qualitative study.NHS 医生寻求心理健康帮助的障碍和促进因素是什么:系统评价和定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 7;22(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04202-9.
4
Peer counsellors' views on the collegial support scheme for doctors.同伴辅导员对医生职业支持计划的看法。
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2016 Feb 23;136(4):313-6. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.0435.
5
Peer counselling for doctors in Norway: A qualitative study of the relationship between support and surveillance.挪威医生的同伴辅导:支持与监督关系的定性研究
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;162:193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.037. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
6
Domestic abuse among female doctors: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews in the UK.国内女医生遭受家暴问题研究:英国定性访谈的主题分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Feb 25;71(704):e193-e200. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0795. Print 2021.
7
Patients' and Doctors' Perceptions of a Mobile Phone-Based Consultation Service for Maternal, Neonatal, and Infant Health Care in Bangladesh: A Mixed-Methods Study.孟加拉国基于移动电话的母婴和婴幼儿健康护理咨询服务的患者和医生认知:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 22;7(4):e11842. doi: 10.2196/11842.
8
Exploring senior doctors' beliefs and attitudes regarding mental illness within the medical profession: a qualitative study.探索医学专业中资深医生对精神疾病的看法和态度:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 16;6(9):e012598. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012598.
9
Coming back from the edge: a qualitative study of a professional support unit for junior doctors.从边缘回归:对青年医生专业支持单位的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Aug 23;17(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0978-0.
10
How online counselling can support partners of individuals with problem alcohol or other drug use.在线咨询如何为有酒精或其他药物使用问题者的伴侣提供支持。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Jul;78:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of peer support on HbA1c levels in middle-aged and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.同伴支持对中老年2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
PeerJ. 2025 Aug 28;13:e19803. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19803. eCollection 2025.
2
Thematic Analysis of Clinician Documentation Surrounding Treatment Discussions and Decision-Making in Patients With Desmoid Tumors.韧带样型纤维瘤病患者治疗讨论与决策相关临床医生记录的主题分析
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(16):e71183. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71183.
3
Maternity staff views on implementing a national perinatal mortality review tool: understanding barriers and facilitators.产科工作人员对实施国家围产期死亡审查工具的看法:了解障碍和促进因素。
J Perinat Med. 2025 Mar 19;53(4):454-466. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2024-0601. Print 2025 May 26.
4
GP perceptions of informal peer support in primary care: a qualitative study.全科医生对初级医疗中非正式同伴支持的看法:一项定性研究。
BJGP Open. 2024 Jul 29;8(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0151. Print 2024 Jul.
5
Understanding peer support: a qualitative interview study of doctors one year after seeking support.理解同伴支持:寻求支持一年后医生的定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09312-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Burnout, Professional Fulfillment, and Self-care Practices of Physician Leaders With Their Independently Rated Leadership Effectiveness.医生领导者的倦怠、职业满足感和自我保健实践与其独立评价的领导力有效性之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207961. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7961.
2
Medical students' attitudes and expectations for future working conditions.医学生对未来工作条件的态度和期望。
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2019 Nov 18;139(17). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0185. Print 2019 Nov 19.
3
Effect of a Professional Coaching Intervention on the Well-being and Distress of Physicians: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.专业辅导干预对医生幸福感和痛苦感的影响:一项试点随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;179(10):1406-1414. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2425.
4
Healing the Professional Culture of Medicine.治愈医学的专业文化。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Aug;94(8):1556-1566. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.026. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
5
Burnout in United States Healthcare Professionals: A Narrative Review.美国医疗保健专业人员的职业倦怠:一项叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2018 Dec 4;10(12):e3681. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3681.
6
Association Between Physician Burnout and Patient Safety, Professionalism, and Patient Satisfaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.医生职业倦怠与患者安全、专业精神和患者满意度之间的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1317-1331. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3713.
7
The Revised Declaration of Geneva: A Modern-Day Physician's Pledge.《日内瓦宣言修订版:当代医生的誓言》
JAMA. 2017 Nov 28;318(20):1971-1972. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16230.
8
Medical Licensure Questions and Physician Reluctance to Seek Care for Mental Health Conditions.医疗执照问题与医师不愿寻求心理健康照护。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Oct;92(10):1486-1493. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.06.020.
9
Gender Differences in Demographic and Clinical Features of Physicians Admitted to a Program for Medical Professionals with Mental Disorders.参加精神障碍医学专业人员项目的医生在人口统计学和临床特征方面的性别差异。
Front Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 25;7:181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00181. eCollection 2016.
10
'You can't be a person and a doctor': the work-life balance of doctors in training-a qualitative study.“你不能既是一个普通人又是一名医生”:规培医生的工作与生活平衡——一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 2;6(12):e013897. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013897.

医生为什么寻求同行支持?一项定性访谈研究。

Why do doctors seek peer support? A qualitative interview study.

机构信息

Modum Bad Research Institute, Vikersund, Norway

Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 21;11(10):e048732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048732.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048732
PMID:34675013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8532555/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand how doctors reflect on when and why they seek help from an organised peer-support service.

DESIGN

Data were collected through audiotaped, qualitative, semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analysed with systematic text condensation.

SETTING

A peer-support service accessible to all doctors in Norway.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirteen doctors were interviewed after attending a counselling service in fall 2018. They were selected to represent variation in gender, demographics, and medical specialty. Doctors were excluded if the interview could not be held within 10 days after they had accessed peer support.

RESULTS

The doctors' perspectives and experiences of when and why they seek support and their expectations of the help they would receive are presented, and barriers to and facilitators of seeking support are discussed. Three categories of help-seeking behaviour were identified: (1) 'Concerned-looking for advice' describing help seeking in a strenuous situation with need for guidance; (2) 'Fear of not coping any longer' describing help seeking when struggling due to unreasonable stress and/or conflict in their lives; and (3) 'Looking for a way back or out' describing help seeking when out of work. Expectations to the help they would receive varied widely. Motivations for seeking help had more to do with factors enabling or restricting help-seeking than with the severity of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Many different situations lead doctors to seek peer support, and they have various expectations of the service as well as diverse needs, motivations and constraints to seeking peer support. Further research is warranted to investigate the impact of peer support and how to tailor the service to best suit doctors' specific needs.

摘要

目的

了解医生何时以及为何寻求有组织的同行支持服务,并反思原因。

设计

通过录音、定性、半结构化访谈收集数据。使用系统文本浓缩法分析访谈内容。

地点

挪威向所有医生开放的同行支持服务。

参与者

2018 年秋季参加咨询服务后,对 13 名医生进行了访谈。他们的选择代表了性别、人口统计学和医学专业的差异。如果在医生获得同行支持后 10 天内无法进行访谈,则将其排除在外。

结果

呈现了医生对寻求支持的时间、原因和期望,以及寻求支持的障碍和促进因素的观点和经验。确定了三种寻求帮助的行为类别:(1)“关注寻求建议”,描述在需要指导的紧张情况下寻求帮助;(2)“担心无法应对”,描述因不合理的压力和/或生活中的冲突而感到挣扎时寻求帮助;(3)“寻求出路”,描述因工作而寻求帮助。对他们将获得的帮助的期望差异很大。寻求帮助的动机更多地与促进或限制寻求帮助的因素有关,而不是与症状的严重程度有关。

结论

许多不同的情况促使医生寻求同行支持,他们对服务有不同的期望,以及不同的需求、动机和寻求同行支持的限制。需要进一步研究以调查同行支持的影响以及如何根据医生的具体需求调整服务。