• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产科工作人员对实施国家围产期死亡审查工具的看法:了解障碍和促进因素。

Maternity staff views on implementing a national perinatal mortality review tool: understanding barriers and facilitators.

作者信息

O'Connor Emily, Helps Aenne, Greene Richard, O'Donoghue Keelin, Leitao Sara

机构信息

INFANT Research Centre, 8795 University College Cork , Cork, Ireland.

Pregnancy Loss Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 8795 University College Cork , Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 2025 Mar 19;53(4):454-466. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2024-0601. Print 2025 May 26.

DOI:10.1515/jpm-2024-0601
PMID:40098463
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Perinatal death reviews investigate the causes of perinatal mortality, identify potentially avoidable factors, and may help prevent further deaths. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a standardised perinatal mortality review tool in Irish maternity units by engaging with healthcare professionals about their opinions on the existing system and implementing a standardised system.

METHODS

This study involved semi-structured interviews with staff from three maternity units of various sizes in Ireland. Recruitment involved purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews took place from May to December 2022 and covered topics such as the existing perinatal mortality review process, staff experiences with reviews and proposed changes to the system. Thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Participants (n=32) included medical and midwifery staff with varying levels of seniority and experience with perinatal mortality reviews. Four themes were identified: the review process, time challenges of reviews, institutional culture and staff needs. Our findings demonstrated that the review process was structured differently across units, with varying levels of staff involvement. Institution culture, leadership and transparency were highlighted as essential aspects of the review process. Reviews have an impact on staff wellbeing, emphasising the need for continued support.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing a standardised perinatal mortality review system is viewed positively by staff, though addressing the highlighted barriers to change is important. A standardised perinatal mortality review tool and review process may help strengthen perinatal death reviews, provide more information and opportunity for involvement for bereaved parents and help reduce future perinatal deaths.

摘要

目的

围产期死亡审查旨在调查围产期死亡率的原因,识别潜在可避免的因素,并可能有助于预防进一步的死亡。本研究旨在通过与医疗保健专业人员就他们对现有系统的看法进行交流并实施标准化系统,来识别爱尔兰 maternity 单位实施标准化围产期死亡审查工具的障碍和促进因素。

方法

本研究对爱尔兰三个不同规模 maternity 单位的工作人员进行了半结构化访谈。招募采用了目的抽样和滚雪球抽样。访谈于2022年5月至12月进行,涵盖了现有围产期死亡审查过程、工作人员的审查经历以及对系统的拟议更改等主题。进行了主题分析。

结果

参与者(n = 32)包括具有不同资历和围产期死亡审查经验的医疗和助产人员。确定了四个主题:审查过程、审查的时间挑战、机构文化和工作人员需求。我们的研究结果表明,各单位的审查过程结构不同,工作人员的参与程度也不同。机构文化、领导力和透明度被强调为审查过程的重要方面。审查对工作人员的幸福感有影响,强调了持续支持的必要性。

结论

工作人员对实施标准化围产期死亡审查系统持积极看法,尽管解决突出的变革障碍很重要。标准化的围产期死亡审查工具和审查过程可能有助于加强围产期死亡审查,为失去亲人的父母提供更多信息和参与机会,并有助于减少未来的围产期死亡。

相似文献

1
Maternity staff views on implementing a national perinatal mortality review tool: understanding barriers and facilitators.产科工作人员对实施国家围产期死亡审查工具的看法:了解障碍和促进因素。
J Perinat Med. 2025 Mar 19;53(4):454-466. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2024-0601. Print 2025 May 26.
2
PARENTS 2 Study: a qualitative study of the views of healthcare professionals and stakeholders on parental engagement in the perinatal mortality review-from 'bottom of the pile' to joint learning.PARENTS 2 研究:一项定性研究,探讨医疗保健专业人员和利益相关者对父母参与围产期死亡审查的看法——从“最底层”到共同学习。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;8(11):e023792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023792.
3
Bereaved parents involvement in maternity hospital perinatal death review processes: 'Nobody even thought to ask us anything'.失去孩子的父母参与产科围产期死亡评审过程:“甚至没有人想到要问我们任何事情”。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):183-198. doi: 10.1111/hex.13645. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
4
Learning from deaths: Parents' Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death (the PARENTS 1 study).从死亡中学习:父母在回顾其死产/围产儿死亡中的积极作用和参与(PARENTS 1 研究)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1509-z.
5
Perinatal mortality audits and reviews: Past, present and the way forward.围产期死亡率审计与评估:过去、现在与未来之路
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jul;250:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.054. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality.通过死亡审核与评估降低孕产妇、围产期及儿童死亡率
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 25;3(3):CD012982. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012982.pub2.
7
Parents' Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death 2 (PARENTS 2) study: a mixed-methods study of implementation.父母在回顾其死产/围产儿死亡 2 (PARENTS 2)研究中的积极作用和参与:一项实施情况的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 16;11(3):e044563. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044563.
8
PARENTS 2 study protocol: pilot of Parents' Active Role and ENgagement in the review of Their Stillbirth/perinatal death.PARENTS 2研究方案:父母在死产/围产期死亡审查中的积极角色与参与试点研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 10;8(1):e020164. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020164.
9
The perinatal bereavement project: development and evaluation of supportive guidelines for families experiencing stillbirth and neonatal death in Southeast Brazil-a quasi-experimental before-and-after study.围产期丧亲项目:为巴西东南部经历死产和新生儿死亡的家庭制定和评估支持性指南-一项准实验性前后研究。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jan 6;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01040-4.
10
Conceptual framework on barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care and treatment for women: the MATRIx evidence synthesis.关于为女性实施围产期心理健康护理和治疗的障碍与促进因素的概念框架:MATRIx证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(2):1-187. doi: 10.3310/KQFE0107.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of standardised tools used in perinatal death review programmes.围产期死亡审查程序中使用的标准化工具的系统评价。
Women Birth. 2024 Feb;37(1):88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
2
Organizational attributes that contribute to the learning & improvement capabilities of healthcare organizations: a scoping review.有助于医疗保健组织学习和改进能力的组织属性:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09562-w.
3
Stress, anxiety, and erosion of trust: maternity staff experiences with incident management.
压力、焦虑与信任的侵蚀:产科工作人员的事件管理体验
AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Aug 11;2(4):100084. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100084. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Bereaved parents involvement in maternity hospital perinatal death review processes: 'Nobody even thought to ask us anything'.失去孩子的父母参与产科围产期死亡评审过程:“甚至没有人想到要问我们任何事情”。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):183-198. doi: 10.1111/hex.13645. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
5
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
6
Overcoming blame culture: key strategies to catalyse maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response.克服指责文化:促进孕产妇和围产期死亡监测与应对的关键策略
BJOG. 2022 May;129(6):839-844. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16989. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
7
Why do doctors seek peer support? A qualitative interview study.医生为什么寻求同行支持?一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 21;11(10):e048732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048732.
8
Team debriefings in healthcare: aligning intention and impact.医疗保健领域的团队汇报:使意图与影响保持一致。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 13;374:n2042. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2042.
9
Advancing physician wellness, engagement and excellence in a mental health setting: a Canadian perspective.推进精神卫生环境中的医生健康、敬业度和卓越表现:加拿大视角。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Feb 17;37(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab061.
10
Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of implementation factors.低收入和中等收入国家的孕产妇及围产期死亡监测与应对:实施因素的范围综述
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Jun 25;36(6):955-973. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab011.