Price D J
Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1986;36:106-11. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-8859-0_29.
The Glasgow Coma Scale has been well established as the ideal scale for identifying specific levels of consciousness. It is widely used to provide a consistent entry criterion for series of head injuries under study, to create arbitrary thresholds for management decisions and as an important component of the data-set for comparative studies of patients in different centres with specified treatment regimes. Its international reputation for application to these 3 functions is well deserved but the dangers of summing the subscores have been rightly emphasized by the designers. Any further improvements may only cause confusion and it will undoubtedly continue as the recognized standard for many years. Unfortunately, this scale is very inadequate for monitoring head injured patients at risk of deterioration as it is insufficiently sensitive. The prompt recognition of the first signs of deteriorating consciousness is of paramount importance. A more sensitive scale encompassing more aspects of the response of the patient to the environment is required. For this purpose of trend detection, subscore summation is acceptable and nurses find a single graph easier to interpret.
格拉斯哥昏迷量表已被公认为识别特定意识水平的理想量表。它被广泛用于为正在研究的一系列头部损伤提供一致的纳入标准,为管理决策设定任意阈值,并作为不同中心接受特定治疗方案的患者比较研究数据集的重要组成部分。它在这三项功能应用方面的国际声誉当之无愧,但设计者正确地强调了将子分数相加的风险。任何进一步的改进可能只会造成混乱,而且毫无疑问,它将在许多年内一直作为公认的标准。不幸的是,该量表在监测有病情恶化风险的头部受伤患者时非常不足,因为它不够敏感。及时识别意识恶化的最初迹象至关重要。需要一个更敏感的量表,涵盖患者对环境反应的更多方面。为了进行趋势检测,子分数相加是可以接受的,而且护士们发现单个图表更容易解读。