• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

限制昏迷量表使用的因素。

Factors restricting the use of coma scales.

作者信息

Price D J

出版信息

Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1986;36:106-11. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-8859-0_29.

DOI:10.1007/978-3-7091-8859-0_29
PMID:3467538
Abstract

The Glasgow Coma Scale has been well established as the ideal scale for identifying specific levels of consciousness. It is widely used to provide a consistent entry criterion for series of head injuries under study, to create arbitrary thresholds for management decisions and as an important component of the data-set for comparative studies of patients in different centres with specified treatment regimes. Its international reputation for application to these 3 functions is well deserved but the dangers of summing the subscores have been rightly emphasized by the designers. Any further improvements may only cause confusion and it will undoubtedly continue as the recognized standard for many years. Unfortunately, this scale is very inadequate for monitoring head injured patients at risk of deterioration as it is insufficiently sensitive. The prompt recognition of the first signs of deteriorating consciousness is of paramount importance. A more sensitive scale encompassing more aspects of the response of the patient to the environment is required. For this purpose of trend detection, subscore summation is acceptable and nurses find a single graph easier to interpret.

摘要

格拉斯哥昏迷量表已被公认为识别特定意识水平的理想量表。它被广泛用于为正在研究的一系列头部损伤提供一致的纳入标准,为管理决策设定任意阈值,并作为不同中心接受特定治疗方案的患者比较研究数据集的重要组成部分。它在这三项功能应用方面的国际声誉当之无愧,但设计者正确地强调了将子分数相加的风险。任何进一步的改进可能只会造成混乱,而且毫无疑问,它将在许多年内一直作为公认的标准。不幸的是,该量表在监测有病情恶化风险的头部受伤患者时非常不足,因为它不够敏感。及时识别意识恶化的最初迹象至关重要。需要一个更敏感的量表,涵盖患者对环境反应的更多方面。为了进行趋势检测,子分数相加是可以接受的,而且护士们发现单个图表更容易解读。

相似文献

1
Factors restricting the use of coma scales.限制昏迷量表使用的因素。
Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1986;36:106-11. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-8859-0_29.
2
The Glasgow Coma Scale--a brief review. Past, present, future.格拉斯哥昏迷量表——简要回顾。过去、现在、未来。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2008 Sep;108(3):75-89.
3
Assessment of responsiveness in head injury patients. The Glasgow Coma Scale and some comments on alternative methods.头部损伤患者反应性评估。格拉斯哥昏迷量表及对其他方法的一些评论。
Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1986;36:91-4.
4
Prognosis and prediction of outcome in comatose head injured patients.昏迷颅脑损伤患者的预后及结局预测
Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1986;36:112-7. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-8859-0_30.
5
Clinical recovery of consciousness after traumatic coma.创伤性昏迷后意识的临床恢复
Crit Care Med. 1994 Jul;22(7):1108-13. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199407000-00010.
6
Coma scales: a historical review.昏迷量表:历史回顾
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2010 Dec;68(6):930-7. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2010000600019.
7
Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma.评估意识障碍和昏迷时的观察者变异性。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978 Jul;41(7):603-10. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.41.7.603.
8
[Evaluation of the level of consciousness in patients with cranio-cerebral injuries].[颅脑损伤患者意识水平的评估]
Rev Bras Enferm. 1978 Jan-Mar;31(1):23-31. doi: 10.1590/0034-716719780001000004.
9
[Evaluation of the level of consciousness in patients with craniocerebral injuries].[颅脑损伤患者意识水平的评估]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 1977 Aug;11(2):100-41.
10
[Quantifying pathological disorders of consciousness. Reliability criteria, aims, feasibility].[意识病理障碍的量化。可靠性标准、目标、可行性]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1993 Jun;28(4):213-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-998910.

引用本文的文献

1
[Prognostic value of routine parameters and laboratory parameters after major trauma. A prospective preclinical-clinical study of air rescue patients].[严重创伤后常规参数和实验室参数的预后价值。一项关于空中救援患者的前瞻性临床前-临床研究]
Unfallchirurg. 2007 Apr;110(4):307-19. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1216-0.
2
The Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). Manual and guidelines.反应水平量表(RLS85)。手册与指南。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988;91(1-2):12-20. doi: 10.1007/BF01400521.
3
Assessment of responsiveness in acute cerebral disorders. A multicentre study on the reaction level scale (RLS 85).
急性脑疾病反应性评估。关于反应水平量表(RLS 85)的多中心研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988;90(3-4):73-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01560558.
4
A comparative study of the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85) with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Edinburgh-2 Coma Scale (modified) (E2CS(M)).反应水平量表(RLS85)与格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)及改良版爱丁堡昏迷量表(E2CS(M))的比较研究
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;110(1-2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/BF01402050.