Suppr超能文献

椎间盘损伤可能性量表:一种估算青光眼所致视神经损伤程度新方法的可重复性。

The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma.

作者信息

Spaeth George L, Henderer Jeffrey, Liu Connie, Kesen Muge, Altangerel Undraa, Bayer Atilla, Katz L Jay, Myers Jonathan, Rhee Douglas, Steinmann William

机构信息

William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Research Laboratories, Wills Eye Hospital, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100:181-5; discussion 185-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The major objective of this study was to test the reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic disc damage in patients with glaucoma.

METHODS

The Disc Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) is based on the appearance of the neuroretinal rim of the optic disc corrected for disc diameter. The eight stages, extending from no damage to far advanced damage, are based on the width of the neuroretinal rim or the circumferential extent of absence of neuroretinal rim. Reproducibility was measured by two masked observers staging 48 optic nerve stereoscopic photographs by two different methods, the cup/disc ratio (c/d) and the DDLS. Also, reproducibility was assessed by three observers examining 34 eyes of 24 patients.

RESULTS

With regard to the photographs, the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was better using the DDLS than the c/d ratio (98% versus 85% for intraobserver of reproducibility, and 85% versus 74% for interobserver reproducibility). The DDLS correlated better with the Humphrey Visual Field than did any Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameter.

CONCLUSION

In a clinical setting, the DDLS is as reproducible as, or more reproducible than, the c/d ratio system of estimating the amount of disc damage in patients with glaucoma.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是测试一种估算青光眼患者视盘损伤程度的新方法的可重复性。

方法

视盘损伤可能性量表(DDLS)基于对视盘神经视网膜边缘外观进行视盘直径校正后得出。从无损伤到晚期损伤的八个阶段,是根据神经视网膜边缘的宽度或神经视网膜边缘缺失的圆周范围划分的。可重复性通过两名盲法观察者采用两种不同方法对48张视神经立体照片进行分期来测量,这两种方法分别是杯盘比(c/d)和DDLS。此外,由三名观察者对24例患者的34只眼睛进行检查来评估可重复性。

结果

对于照片,使用DDLS时观察者内和观察者间的可重复性优于杯盘比(观察者内可重复性分别为98%对85%,观察者间可重复性分别为85%对74%)。DDLS与Humphrey视野的相关性比任何海德堡视网膜断层扫描参数都更好。

结论

在临床环境中,DDLS在估算青光眼患者视盘损伤程度方面,与杯盘比系统具有相同的可重复性,或者比杯盘比系统具有更高的可重复性。

相似文献

7
Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale.椎间盘损伤可能性量表的可靠性。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan;135(1):44-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01833-0.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Genetic determination of cup/disc ratio of the optic nerve.视神经杯盘比的遗传决定因素
Arch Ophthalmol. 1967 Jul;78(1):35-43. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1967.00980030037007.
10
Quantitation of optic disc cupping.视盘杯状凹陷定量分析。
Ophthalmology. 1985 Dec;92(12):1654-6. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(85)34085-x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验