White Ashley, Faith Trevor D, Ba Aissatou, Loftley Aundrea, Ramakrishnan Viswanathan, Johnson Hetlena, Rose Jillian, Dismuke-Greer Clara L, Oates Jim C, Egede Leonard E, Williams Edith M
Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 5;12:734390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734390. eCollection 2021.
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory disease in which the immune system attacks healthy tissues. While pharmaceutical therapies are an important part of disease management, behavioral interventions have been implemented to increase patients' disease self-management skills, provide social support, and encourage patients to take a more active role in their care. Three interventions are considered in this study; peer-to-peer methodology, patient support group, and a patient navigator program that were implemented among largely African American women with SLE at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC). Outcomes of interest were patient activation and lupus self-efficacy. We used a Least Squares Means model to analyze change in total patient activation and lupus self-efficacy independently in each cohort. We adjusted for demographic variables of age, education, income, employment, and insurance. In both unadjusted and adjusted models for patient activation, there were no statistically significant differences among the three intervention methodologies when comparing changes from baseline to post intervention. Differences in total coping score from baseline to post intervention in the patient navigator group (-101.23, -value 0.04) and differences in scores comparing the patient navigator with the support group were statistically significant (116.96, -value 0.038). However, only the difference in total coping from baseline to post intervention for the patient navigator program remained statistically significant (-98.78, -value 0.04) in the adjusted model. Tailored interventions are a critical pathway toward improving disease self-management among SLE patients. Interventions should consider including patient navigation because this method was shown to be superior in improving self-efficacy (coping scores).
系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是一种慢性炎症性疾病,免疫系统会攻击健康组织。虽然药物治疗是疾病管理的重要组成部分,但也已实施行为干预措施,以提高患者的疾病自我管理技能、提供社会支持,并鼓励患者在自身护理中发挥更积极的作用。本研究考虑了三种干预措施;同伴互助方法、患者支持小组以及患者导航计划,这些措施在南卡罗来纳医科大学(MUSC)主要为患有SLE的非裔美国女性中实施。感兴趣的结果是患者激活度和狼疮自我效能感。我们使用最小二乘均值模型,分别分析每个队列中患者总激活度和狼疮自我效能感的变化。我们对年龄、教育程度、收入、就业和保险等人口统计学变量进行了调整。在未调整和调整后的患者激活度模型中,比较干预前基线到干预后的变化时,三种干预方法之间没有统计学上的显著差异。患者导航小组干预前基线到干预后的总应对得分差异(-101.23,p值0.04)以及患者导航小组与支持小组得分差异具有统计学意义(116.96,p值0.038)。然而,在调整后的模型中,只有患者导航计划干预前基线到干预后的总应对得分差异仍然具有统计学意义(-98.78,p值0.04)。量身定制的干预措施是改善SLE患者疾病自我管理的关键途径。干预措施应考虑纳入患者导航,因为这种方法在提高自我效能感(应对得分)方面表现更优。