Samson Nina, Khanolkar Rutvij A, Quirk Sarah, Quon Harvey, Roumeliotis Michael, Balogh Alex, Sia Michael, Thind Kundan, Husain Siraj, Martell Kevin
Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada.
Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.
Curr Oncol. 2021 Sep 26;28(5):3729-3737. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28050318.
Radical treatment of localized prostate cancer in elderly patients may lead to unacceptable treatment-associated toxicities that adversely impact quality of life without improving survival outcomes. This study reports on a cohort of 54 elderly (>70 years) patients that received 4000-5000 cGy of palliative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as an alternative to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The primary outcome of interest was the period of ADT-free survival, and secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and metastases-free survival (MFS). Kaplan-Meier regression was used to estimate survival outcomes. Thirty-six (67%) patients achieved a break in ADT post-radiotherapy, with a median time to ADT reinitiation of 20 months. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were limited to low-grade gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicities, with no skin toxicities observed. Grade 1 GI toxicity was observed in 9 (17%) patients, and grades 1 and 2 GU toxicities were observed in 13 (24%) and 3 (6%) patients, respectively, with no higher-grade toxicities reported. Five-year MFS and OS were 56% and 78%, respectively. In summary, the treatment regimen was well-tolerated and achieved durable ADT-free survival in most patients. Dose-reduced EBRT appears to be a viable alternative to ADT in elderly patients with localized prostate cancer.
对老年患者进行局限性前列腺癌的根治性治疗可能会导致难以接受的与治疗相关的毒性反应,这些毒性反应会对生活质量产生不利影响,而不会改善生存结果。本研究报告了一组54名老年(>70岁)患者,他们接受了4000-5000 cGy的姑息性外照射放疗(EBRT),作为雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)的替代方案。感兴趣的主要结局是无ADT生存期,次要结局包括总生存期(OS)和无转移生存期(MFS)。采用Kaplan-Meier回归分析来估计生存结局。36名(67%)患者在放疗后实现了ADT中断,ADT重新开始的中位时间为20个月。不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)仅限于低级别胃肠道(GI)或泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性反应,未观察到皮肤毒性反应。9名(17%)患者出现1级GI毒性反应,13名(24%)和3名(6%)患者分别出现1级和2级GU毒性反应,未报告更高级别的毒性反应。5年MFS和OS分别为56%和78%。总之,该治疗方案耐受性良好,大多数患者实现了持久的无ADT生存期。剂量降低的EBRT似乎是老年局限性前列腺癌患者ADT的可行替代方案。