Suppr超能文献

绵羊农场福利评估的基于动物的指标

Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep.

作者信息

Zufferey Romane, Minnig Adrian, Thomann Beat, Zwygart Sibylle, Keil Nina, Schüpbach Gertraud, Miserez Raymond, Zanolari Patrik, Stucki Dimitri

机构信息

Clinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.

Vetsuisse-Faculty, Veterinary Public Health Institute, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 15;11(10):2973. doi: 10.3390/ani11102973.

Abstract

The value society assigns to animal welfare in agricultural productions is increasing, resulting in ever-enhancing methods to assess the well-being of farm animals. The aim of this study was to review the scientific literature to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on welfare assessments for sheep and to extract animal-based welfare indicators as well as welfare protocols with animal-based indicators. By title and abstract screening, we identified five protocols and 53 potential indicators from 55 references. Three out of the five protocols include animal-based as well as resource-based indicators. All of them were assessed as being practicable on-farm but lacking reliability. Some of the single indicators are endorsed by the literature and widely used in the field like assessment of behaviour, lameness or body condition score. Others (e.g., Faffa Malan Chart FAMACHA©, dag score or pain assessment) are regularly mentioned in the literature, but their reliability and usefulness are still subject of discussion. Several indicators, such as pruritic behaviour, eye condition, lying time or tooth loss are relatively new in the literature and still lack evidence for their validity and usefulness. This literature review serves as a starting point for the development of valid and practicable welfare protocols for sheep.

摘要

社会对农业生产中动物福利的重视程度日益提高,这促使评估农场动物福利的方法不断改进。本研究旨在回顾科学文献,以全面了解当前关于绵羊福利评估的知识,并提取基于动物的福利指标以及包含基于动物指标的福利评估方案。通过标题和摘要筛选,我们从55篇参考文献中确定了5个评估方案和53个潜在指标。这5个评估方案中有3个既包含基于动物的指标,也包含基于资源的指标。所有这些方案在农场实践中都被认为是可行的,但缺乏可靠性。一些单一指标得到了文献的认可,并在该领域广泛应用,如行为评估、跛足评估或体况评分。其他指标(如Faffa Malan图表FAMACHA©、日龄评分或疼痛评估)在文献中经常被提及,但其可靠性和实用性仍存在争议。一些指标,如瘙痒行为、眼部状况、躺卧时间或牙齿脱落,在文献中相对较新,其有效性和实用性仍缺乏证据支持。本综述为制定有效的、可行的绵羊福利评估方案提供了一个起点。

相似文献

1
Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 15;11(10):2973. doi: 10.3390/ani11102973.
2
Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 2;11(11):3138. doi: 10.3390/ani11113138.
3
How Can We Assess Positive Welfare in Ruminants?
Animals (Basel). 2019 Oct 2;9(10):758. doi: 10.3390/ani9100758.
4
Evaluation of Animal-Based Indicators to Be Used in a Welfare Assessment Protocol for Sheep.
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Dec 11;4:210. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00210. eCollection 2017.
5
Invited review: Animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment for dairy goats.
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Nov;97(11):6625-48. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7493. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
7
Inter-observer agreement, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of animal-based indicators of young lamb welfare.
Animal. 2013 Jul;7(7):1182-90. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113000487. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
9
Reliability of indicators of sheep welfare assessed by a group observation method.
Vet J. 2012 Jul;193(1):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
10
Iceberg Indicators for Animal Welfare in Rural Sheep Farms Using the Five Domains Model Approach.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 2;10(12):2273. doi: 10.3390/ani10122273.

引用本文的文献

2
The Use of Machine Learning to Predict Prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis in Dairy Sheep Farms.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;14(16):2295. doi: 10.3390/ani14162295.
3
Investigating the use of machine learning algorithms to support risk-based animal welfare inspections of cattle and pig farms.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Aug 13;11:1401007. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1401007. eCollection 2024.
4
Acute post-orchiectomy pain does not reduce alpha rams' interest in feed resources.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Mar 19;11:1299550. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1299550. eCollection 2024.
5
Development of a Parturition Detection System for Korean Native Black Goats.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 16;14(4):634. doi: 10.3390/ani14040634.
6
Review of Rat (), Mouse (), Guinea pig (), and Rabbit () Indicators for Welfare Assessment.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 30;13(13):2167. doi: 10.3390/ani13132167.

本文引用的文献

2
Evaluating the welfare of extensively managed sheep.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0218603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218603. eCollection 2019.
4
5
Sensitivity and specificity of the FAMACHA© system in growing lambs.
Vet Parasitol. 2018 Feb 15;251:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Evaluation of Animal-Based Indicators to Be Used in a Welfare Assessment Protocol for Sheep.
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Dec 11;4:210. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00210. eCollection 2017.
8
Animal-Based Measures to Assess the Welfare of Extensively Managed Ewes.
Animals (Basel). 2017 Dec 24;8(1):2. doi: 10.3390/ani8010002.
9
The Sheep Grimace Scale as an indicator of post-operative distress and pain in laboratory sheep.
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 19;12(4):e0175839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175839. eCollection 2017.
10
Coding and quantification of a facial expression for pain in lambs.
Behav Processes. 2016 Nov;132:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验