Cáceres Diego H, Gómez Beatriz L, Tobón Ángela M, Minderman Melissa, Bridges Nicole, Chiller Tom, Lindsley Mark D
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Center of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;7(10):799. doi: 10.3390/jof7100799.
Histoplasmosis is a major cause of mortality in people living with HIV (PLHIV). Rapid methods to diagnose disease could dramatically decrease the time to initiate treatment, resulting in reduced mortality. The aim of this study was to validate a MiraVista Diagnostics (MVD) urine antigen lateral flow assay (MVD LFA) for the detection of antigen (Ag) in urine and compare this LFA against the MVista Ag quantitative enzyme immunoassays (MVD EIA). We assessed the MVD LFA using a standardized reference panel of urine specimens from Colombia. We tested 100 urine specimens, 26 from PLHIV diagnosed with histoplasmosis, 42 from PLHIV with other infectious diseases, and 32 from non-HIV infected persons without histoplasmosis. Sensitivity and specificity of the MVD LFA was 96%, compared with 96% sensitivity and 77% specificity of the MVD EIA. Concordance analysis between MVD LFA and the MVD EIA displayed an 84% agreement, and a Kappa of 0.656. The MVD LFA evaluated in this study has several advantages, including a turnaround time for results of approximately 40 min, no need for complex laboratory infrastructure or highly trained laboratory personnel, use of urine specimens, and ease of performing.
组织胞浆菌病是艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)死亡的主要原因。快速诊断疾病的方法可显著缩短开始治疗的时间,从而降低死亡率。本研究的目的是验证MiraVista诊断公司(MVD)的尿液抗原侧向流动分析法(MVD LFA)用于检测尿液中的抗原(Ag),并将该LFA与MVista抗原定量酶免疫分析法(MVD EIA)进行比较。我们使用来自哥伦比亚的标准化尿液标本参考面板评估了MVD LFA。我们检测了100份尿液标本,其中26份来自诊断为组织胞浆菌病的PLHIV,42份来自患有其他传染病的PLHIV,32份来自未感染艾滋病毒且无组织胞浆菌病的人。MVD LFA的灵敏度和特异性为96%,而MVD EIA的灵敏度为96%,特异性为77%。MVD LFA与MVD EIA之间的一致性分析显示一致性为84%,kappa值为0.656。本研究中评估的MVD LFA有几个优点,包括结果周转时间约为40分钟,无需复杂的实验室基础设施或训练有素的实验室人员,使用尿液标本,且易于操作。