Jung Joon Min, Cho Ji Young, Lee Woo Jin, Chang Sung Eun, Lee Mi Woo, Won Chong Hyun
Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Department of Medical Science, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea.
J Pers Med. 2021 Sep 24;11(10):951. doi: 10.3390/jpm11100951.
With the increasing incidence of skin cancer, many noninvasive technologies to detect its presence have been developed. This review focuses on reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), optical coherence tomography (OCT), high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS), electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), pigmented lesion assay (PLA), and Raman spectroscopy (RS) and discusses the basic principle, clinical applications, advantages, and disadvantages of each technology. RCM provides high cellular resolution and has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of skin cancer. OCT provides lower resolution than RCM, although its evaluable depth is deeper than that of RCM. RCM and OCT may be useful in reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies, evaluating the tumor margin, and monitoring treatment response. HFUS can be mainly used to delineate tumor depths or margins and monitor the treatment response. EIS provides high sensitivity but low specificity for the diagnosis of skin malignancies. PLA, which is based on the genetic information of lesions, is applicable for the detection of melanoma with high sensitivity and moderate-to-high specificity. RS showed high accuracy for the diagnosis of skin cancer, although more clinical studies are required. Advances in these technologies for the diagnosis of skin cancer can lead to the realization of optimized and individualized treatments.
随着皮肤癌发病率的不断上升,已开发出许多用于检测其存在的非侵入性技术。本综述重点关注反射式共聚焦显微镜(RCM)、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)、高频超声(HFUS)、电阻抗光谱(EIS)、色素沉着病变检测(PLA)和拉曼光谱(RS),并讨论了每种技术的基本原理、临床应用、优点和缺点。RCM具有高细胞分辨率,对皮肤癌的诊断具有高灵敏度和特异性。OCT提供的分辨率低于RCM,但其可评估深度比RCM更深。RCM和OCT可能有助于减少不必要的活检数量、评估肿瘤边缘和监测治疗反应。HFUS主要可用于描绘肿瘤深度或边缘并监测治疗反应。EIS对皮肤恶性肿瘤的诊断具有高灵敏度但低特异性。基于病变基因信息的PLA适用于高灵敏度和中高特异性地检测黑色素瘤。RS对皮肤癌的诊断显示出高准确性,尽管还需要更多的临床研究。这些皮肤癌诊断技术的进步可导致实现优化和个体化治疗。