Risch N
Am J Hum Genet. 1987 Jan;40(1):1-14.
The relationship between increased risk in relatives over population prevalence (lambda R = KR/K) and probability of sharing zero marker alleles identical by descent (ibd) at a linked locus (such as HLA) by an affected relative pair is examined. For a model assuming a single disease-susceptibility locus or group of loci tightly linked to a marker locus, the relationship is remarkably simple and general. Namely, if phi R is the prior probability for the relative pair to share zero marker alleles identical by descent, then P (sharing 0 markers/both relatives are affected) is just phi R/lambda R. Alternatively, lambda AR, the increased risk over population prevalence to a relative R due to a disease locus tightly linked to marker locus A, equals the prior probability that the relative pair share zero A alleles ibd divided by the posterior probability that they share zero alleles ibd, given that they are both affected. For example, for affected sib pairs, P (sharing 0 markers/both sibs are affected) = .25/lambda S. This formula holds true for any number of alleles at the disease locus and for their frequencies, penetrances, and population prevalence. Similar formulas are derived for sharing one and two markers. Application of these formulas to several well-studied HLA-associated diseases yields the following results: For multiple sclerosis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and coeliac disease, a single-locus model of disease susceptibility is rejected, implying the existence of additional unlinked familial determinants. For all three diseases, the effect of the HLA-linked locus on familiality is minor: for multiple sclerosis, it accounts for only a 2.5-fold increased risk to sibs over the population prevalence, compared to an observed value of 20; for coeliac disease, it accounts for approximately a 5.25-fold increased risk to sibs, while the observed value is on the order of 60; for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, it accounts for a 3.42-fold increased risk in sibs, while the observed value is 15. In all cases, the secondary determinants must be outside the HLA region. For tuberculoid leprosy, an unlinked familial determinant is also implicated (increased risk to sibs due to HLA = 1.49; observed value = 2.38). For hemochromatosis and Hodgkin's disease, there is little evidence for HLA-unlinked familial determinants. With this formula, it is also possible to examine the hypothesis of pleiotropy versus linkage dis-equilibrium by comparing lambda AS with the increased risk to sibs due to the associated allele(s).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
研究了亲属患病风险增加与群体患病率之比(λR = KR/K)和患病亲属对在连锁位点(如HLA)上通过血缘共享零个标记等位基因(ibd)的概率之间的关系。对于假设存在单个疾病易感位点或与标记位点紧密连锁的一组位点的模型,这种关系非常简单且具有普遍性。具体而言,如果φR是亲属对通过血缘共享零个标记等位基因的先验概率,那么P(共享0个标记/两个亲属均患病)就等于φR/λR。或者,λAR是由于与标记位点A紧密连锁的疾病位点导致亲属R相对于群体患病率增加的风险,它等于亲属对共享零个A等位基因ibd的先验概率除以在他们均患病的情况下共享零个等位基因ibd的后验概率。例如,对于患病同胞对,P(共享0个标记/两个同胞均患病)= 0.25/λS。该公式适用于疾病位点的任何等位基因数量及其频率、外显率和群体患病率。对于共享一个和两个标记也推导出了类似的公式。将这些公式应用于几种经过充分研究的HLA相关疾病,得出以下结果:对于多发性硬化症、胰岛素依赖型糖尿病和乳糜泻,疾病易感的单基因座模型被否定,这意味着存在其他非连锁的家族性决定因素。对于所有这三种疾病,HLA连锁位点对家族聚集性的影响较小:对于多发性硬化症,与观察到的20倍相比,它仅使同胞的患病风险比群体患病率增加2.5倍;对于乳糜泻,它使同胞的患病风险增加约5.25倍,而观察值约为60倍;对于胰岛素依赖型糖尿病,它使同胞的患病风险增加3.42倍,而观察值为15倍。在所有情况下,次要决定因素必定在HLA区域之外。对于结核样麻风,也涉及一个非连锁的家族性决定因素(由于HLA导致同胞患病风险增加 = 1.49;观察值 = 2.38)。对于血色素沉着症和霍奇金病,几乎没有证据表明存在与HLA非连锁的家族性决定因素。利用这个公式,还可以通过比较λAS与相关等位基因导致同胞患病风险增加的情况来检验基因多效性与连锁不平衡的假设。(摘要截断于400字)