• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨皮质切开辅助自锁托槽与传统或自锁托槽治疗重度上牙列拥挤的患者的整平排齐时间和牙周状况比较:一项 3 臂随机对照临床试验。

Leveling and alignment time and the periodontal status in patients with severe upper crowding treated by corticotomy-assisted self-ligating brackets in comparison with conventional or self-ligating brackets only: a 3-arm randomized controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria.

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria.

出版信息

J World Fed Orthod. 2022 Feb;11(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.09.002
PMID:34688577
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The lengthy period of time required is one of the main reasons patients refuse orthodontic treatment. In addition, treatment may have negative effects on periodontal tissues.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the overall time needed for leveling and alignment and the periodontal indices in adult patients with severe crowding. Patients were treated using either self-ligating brackets associated with flapless corticotomy (SLBs + FC group), self-ligating brackets alone (SLBs group), or conventional brackets (CBs group) alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 57 adult patients (10 male patients, 47 female patients) referred to the Department of Orthodontics, the University of Damascus Dental School from August 2018 to March 2019, were enrolled in this trial. The patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: CBs (mean age: 19.62 ± 2.42 years), SLBs (mean age: 19.98 ± 2.84 years), or SLBs + FC (mean age: 20.67 ± 2.59 years). The overall alignment time for the upper anterior teeth was calculated. The following periodontal parameters were measured at 5 assessment times: plaque index, gingival index, papillary bleeding index, and probing depth.

RESULTS

The average leveling and alignment time was 81.89 ± 9.49 days, 123 ± 10.69 days, and 165.25 ± 13.05 days for the SLBs + FC group, the SLBs group, and the CBs group, respectively. A significant reduction in the overall alignment duration was found in the SLBs + FC group by 50%, and in the SLBs group by 25%, compared to the control group, with a statistically significant difference among the 3 groups (P < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences in the periodontal indices (except probing depth) after 1 month, with values greater in the SLBs + FC group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using self-ligating brackets in combination with flapless corticotomy may be effective in accelerating upper dental decrowding in adult patients, with a reduction of 50% of the normal treatment time using traditional brackets. Using self-ligating brackets alone reduced treatment time by 25%. The adjunctive flapless corticotomy did not cause clinically negative effects on the periodontal tissues.

摘要

简介

治疗所需的漫长时间是患者拒绝正畸治疗的主要原因之一。此外,治疗可能对牙周组织产生负面影响。

目的

本研究旨在评估严重拥挤的成年患者排齐整平所需的总时间以及牙周指数。使用自锁托槽联合无瓣皮质切开术(SLBs+FC 组)、自锁托槽(SLBs 组)或传统托槽(CBs 组)单独治疗患者。

材料和方法

2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 3 月,共有 57 名成年患者(10 名男性患者,47 名女性患者)被纳入本试验,这些患者被分配至 3 个组之一:CBs 组(平均年龄:19.62±2.42 岁)、SLBs 组(平均年龄:19.98±2.84 岁)或 SLBs+FC 组(平均年龄:20.67±2.59 岁)。计算上前牙的整体排齐时间。在 5 个评估时间点测量以下牙周参数:菌斑指数、牙龈指数、乳头出血指数和探诊深度。

结果

SLBs+FC 组、SLBs 组和 CBs 组的平均排齐和整平时间分别为 81.89±9.49 天、123±10.69 天和 165.25±13.05 天。与对照组相比,SLBs+FC 组的整体排齐时间减少了 50%,SLBs 组减少了 25%,3 组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。1 个月后,牙周指数(探诊深度除外)有统计学差异,SLBs+FC 组值较大(P<0.05)。

结论

在成年患者中,使用自锁托槽联合无瓣皮质切开术可能有助于加速上颌牙齿排齐,使用传统托槽可将正常治疗时间缩短 50%。单独使用自锁托槽可将治疗时间缩短 25%。辅助无瓣皮质切开术对牙周组织没有产生临床负面影响。

相似文献

1
Leveling and alignment time and the periodontal status in patients with severe upper crowding treated by corticotomy-assisted self-ligating brackets in comparison with conventional or self-ligating brackets only: a 3-arm randomized controlled clinical trial.骨皮质切开辅助自锁托槽与传统或自锁托槽治疗重度上牙列拥挤的患者的整平排齐时间和牙周状况比较:一项 3 臂随机对照临床试验。
J World Fed Orthod. 2022 Feb;11(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
2
Assessment of Dentoalveolar Changes Following Leveling and Alignment of Severely Crowded Upper Anterior Teeth Using Self-Ligating Brackets Alone or With Flapless Piezocision Compared to Traditional Brackets: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.与传统托槽相比,单独使用自结扎托槽或联合无瓣压电切开术排齐严重拥挤的上前牙后牙槽骨变化的评估:一项随机对照临床试验
Cureus. 2023 Mar 3;15(3):e35733. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35733. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Evaluation of Patient-Centered Outcomes Associated With the Acceleration of Upper Incisor Decrowding Using Self-Ligating Brackets With or Without Piezocision in Comparison With Traditional Brackets: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.与传统托槽相比,使用或不使用压电切开术的自锁托槽加速上颌前牙排齐相关的以患者为中心的结局评估:一项三臂随机对照试验。
Cureus. 2022 Jun 30;14(6):e26467. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26467. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Effects of self-ligating and conventional brackets on halitosis and periodontal conditions.自锁托槽与传统托槽对口臭及牙周状况的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):468-73. doi: 10.2319/041714-289.1. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
5
Effect of bracket type on halitosis, periodontal status, and microbial colonization.托槽类型对口臭、牙周状况和微生物定植的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2014 May;84(3):479-85. doi: 10.2319/061913-461.1. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
6
Gingival response in orthodontic patients: Comparative study between self-ligating and conventional brackets.正畸患者的牙龈反应:自结扎托槽与传统托槽的比较研究。
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2014;27(3):120-4. doi: 10.1590/S1852-48342014000300004.
7
A comparative study of initial changes in pulpal blood flow between conventional and self-ligating fixed orthodontic brackets during leveling and alignment stage.传统与自锁托槽固定矫治器在排齐整平阶段牙髓血流初始变化的对比研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):971-981. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03386-2. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
8
Is It Possible to Achieve Favorable Accelerated Dental Changes with No Periodontal Complications When Retracting Upper Anterior Teeth Assisted by Flapless Corticotomy Compared to Traditional Corticotomy? A Two-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.在上颌前牙瓣外皮质切开术辅助内收与传统皮质切开术相比,是否可以实现无牙周并发症的有利加速牙齿移动?一项双臂随机对照试验。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2022 Mar 7;2022:4261248. doi: 10.1155/2022/4261248. eCollection 2022.
9
[Are self-ligating brackets more efficient than conventional brackets ? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled and split-mouth trials].[自锁托槽比传统托槽更有效吗?一项对随机对照试验和自身对照试验的荟萃分析]
Orthod Fr. 2020 Dec 1;91(4):303-321. doi: 10.1684/orthodfr.2020.29.
10
Alterations in plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation promoted by treatment with self-ligating and conventional orthodontic brackets.自锁式和传统正畸托槽治疗对菌斑堆积和牙龈炎症的影响
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Mar-Apr;20(2):35-41. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.035-041.oar.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation on External Apical Root Resorption and Periodontal Indices Following En-Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.低强度电刺激对年轻成年人上前牙整体后移后根尖外吸收及牙周指数的影响:一项随机对照试验
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70188. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70188.
2
Effectiveness of piezoelectric-assisted orthodontic treatment : Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.压电辅助正畸治疗的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s00056-025-00601-1.
3
Periodontal Health Changes During Lower Anterior Crowding Treatment With a Modified Inman Appliance: A Prospective Cohort Study.
使用改良英曼矫治器治疗下前牙拥挤期间的牙周健康变化:一项前瞻性队列研究
Cureus. 2025 Feb 12;17(2):e78909. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78909. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Effect of conventional and self-ligating brackets on periodontal health. Systematic review and meta-analysis.传统托槽与自锁托槽对牙周健康的影响。系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Mar 1;16(3):e358-e366. doi: 10.4317/jced.61378. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Associated With the Acceleration of Canine Retraction by Piezosurgery in Comparison With Low-Level Laser Therapy: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.与低强度激光疗法相比,评估压电手术加速犬牙回缩相关的患者报告结局指标(PROMs):一项三臂随机对照临床试验。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 7;16(1):e51779. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51779. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
A Review on Orthodontic Brackets and Their Application in Clinical Orthodontics.正畸托槽及其在临床正畸中的应用综述
Cureus. 2023 Oct 7;15(10):e46615. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46615. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
The effectiveness of minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted canines compared to the traditional traction method in terms of treatment duration, velocity of traction movement and the associated dentoalveolar changes: A randomized controlled trial.微创骨皮质切开辅助正畸治疗上颌埋伏尖牙与传统牵引方法在治疗时间、牵引移动速度和相关牙牙槽变化方面的比较:一项随机对照试验。
F1000Res. 2023 Jun 19;12:699. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.135338.1. eCollection 2023.
8
Effectiveness of Flapless Cortico-Alveolar Perforations Using Mechanical Drills Versus Traditional Corticotomy on the Retraction of Maxillary Canines in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.使用机械钻进行无瓣皮质-牙槽骨穿孔与传统皮质切开术对上颌II类1分类错牙合患者上颌尖牙后移的效果比较:一项三臂随机对照临床试验
Cureus. 2023 Aug 27;15(8):e44190. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44190. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Evaluation of Patient-Centered Outcomes Associated With the Acceleration of en-Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth Assisted by Flapless Corticotomy Compared to Traditional Corticotomy: A Two-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.与传统皮质切开术相比,无瓣皮质切开术辅助加速上前牙整体后缩相关的以患者为中心的结局评估:双臂随机对照试验。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 21;15(7):e42273. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42273. eCollection 2023 Jul.
10
The efficacy and accuracy of 3D-guided orthodontic piezocision: a randomized controlled trial.3D 引导正畸超声骨刀辅助精准性和疗效的随机对照研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02902-6.