Physiotherapy Department, Cavan General Hospital, Cavan, Ireland.
Orthopaedic Department, Cavan General Hospital, Cavan, Ireland.
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Dec;156:104613. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104613. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid and expansive roll out of telehealth applications as a mode of intervention delivery. The effectiveness of this model of care is currently unclear.
A cross-sectional observational study evaluating the Irish physiotherapist's experience of telehealth.
Irish Physiotherapists completed an online survey, distributed by the Irish Society of Chartered Physiotherapists (ISCP), exploring considerations and barriers to commencing telehealth, advantages and disadvantages to telehealth, overall experience of telehealth, and their opinion on the future of telehealth. A descriptive approach and conceptual content analysis were used to analysis the data to derive determinants for the continuation of telehealth.
In total, 205 physiotherapists completed the survey. Seventy-eight per cent were female. Participant's mean age range was 36 to 45 years with 17 years of physiotherapy experience. Eighty-three per cent had no experience with telehealth pre COVID-19. Considerations to commencing telehealth included service user's suitability, adequate technical and organisational resources, physiotherapist's professional conduct, physiotherapist's skills and COVID-19 restrictions. No outstanding barrier to telehealth was identified. Respondents identify that telehealth offered a reduction in travel time for the service user (82%), offer flexibility in the delivery of physiotherapy (81%) and avoid contact with a potential COVID-19 spreader (92%). The limited scope of the physical examination (86%) via telehealth is the significant disadvantage. Telehealth is considered a temporary stop-gap during the COVID-19 pandemic by forty per cent of physiotherapists while sixty per cent consider telehealth as a sustainable alternative mode of health care delivery.
At present, health care providers have not universally accepted telehealth as a mode of health care delivery. Our study's findings identify key areas to address to encourage acceptance.
COVID-19 大流行导致远程医疗应用迅速广泛地推出,作为一种干预手段。这种护理模式的效果目前尚不清楚。
一项横断面观察性研究,评估爱尔兰物理治疗师对远程医疗的体验。
爱尔兰物理治疗师通过爱尔兰特许物理治疗师协会(ISCP)在线调查,调查他们开始远程医疗的考虑因素和障碍、远程医疗的优缺点、远程医疗的总体体验以及对远程医疗未来的看法。采用描述性方法和概念内容分析对数据进行分析,以得出继续远程医疗的决定因素。
共有 205 名物理治疗师完成了调查。78%为女性。参与者的平均年龄范围为 36 至 45 岁,具有 17 年的物理治疗经验。83%的人在 COVID-19 之前没有远程医疗经验。开展远程医疗的考虑因素包括服务使用者的适宜性、充足的技术和组织资源、物理治疗师的专业行为、物理治疗师的技能和 COVID-19 限制。没有发现远程医疗的突出障碍。受访者认为远程医疗为服务使用者节省了旅行时间(82%),提供了更灵活的物理治疗交付方式(81%),避免了与潜在 COVID-19 传播者的接触(92%)。通过远程医疗进行的体检范围有限(86%)是一个显著的劣势。40%的物理治疗师认为远程医疗只是 COVID-19 大流行期间的临时权宜之计,而 60%的人则认为远程医疗是一种可持续的替代医疗服务模式。
目前,医疗保健提供者尚未普遍接受远程医疗作为一种医疗服务模式。我们的研究结果确定了鼓励接受远程医疗的关键领域。