Suppr超能文献

兔(Oryctolagus cuniculus)和豚鼠(Cavia porcellus)消化道中的砂积物:阑尾的作用。

Sand accumulation in the digestive tract of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus): The role of the appendix.

机构信息

Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

出版信息

J Morphol. 2022 Jan;283(1):5-15. doi: 10.1002/jmor.21423. Epub 2021 Oct 29.

Abstract

We determined location and amount of accumulated sand in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) fed diets containing external (silicate) abrasives. Computed tomographic abdominal images of rabbits (n = 44) and guinea pigs (n = 16) that each received varying numbers (4-7) of different diets for 14 days each (total n = 311 computed tomographs), and radiographs of dissected GIT and presence of silica in GIT content (n = 46 animals) were evaluated. In rabbits, the majority of accumulated sand was located in the caecal appendix, an elongated, intestinal structure in the left side of the abdomen. The 'wash-back' colonic separation mechanism in rabbits may be partly responsible for a retrograde transport of sand back to the caecum, where dense, small particles accumulate in the appendix. The appendix likely acted as a reservoir of these particles, leading to significant effects not only of the momentary but also of the previous diet on recorded sand volumes in the rabbits. Guinea pigs have no caecal appendix and a colonic separation mechanism not based on a 'wash-back'. Less sand accumulation was found in their GIT without a specific location pattern, and there were less previous diet effects in this species. None of the rabbits or guinea pigs developed clinical signs of obstruction during the study, and the recorded sand volumes represented 1.0 ± 1.2% of the 14-d sand intake in rabbits and 0.2 ± 0.2% in guinea pigs. Accumulation of sand in volumes up to 10 cm in the GIT of rabbits does not seem to cause clinical health impairment. Large inter-individual differences in rabbits indicate inter-individual variation in proneness to sand accumulation. The reason for the presence of a sand-trapping caecal appendix in animals that are, due to their burrowing lifestyle and feeding close to the ground, predestined for accidental sand ingestion, remains to be unveiled.

摘要

我们确定了喂食含有外源性(硅酸盐)磨料的饮食的兔子(Oryctolagus cuniculus)和豚鼠(Cavia porcellus)的胃肠道(GIT)中沙粒的位置和积累量。对接受不同数量(4-7)的不同饮食 14 天的兔子(n=44)和豚鼠(n=16)的腹部 CT 图像(总 n=311 次 CT)以及 GIT 内容物中存在的 X 线片和硅的 GIT 进行了评估(n=46 只动物)。在兔子中,大部分积累的沙子位于盲肠附件中,盲肠附件是腹部左侧的一个细长的肠结构。兔子的“回冲”结肠分离机制可能部分负责沙子逆行运输回盲肠,在盲肠中,致密的小颗粒在盲肠附件中积累。盲肠附件可能充当这些颗粒的储库,不仅对当前饮食而且对先前饮食对兔子中记录的沙子体积产生显著影响。豚鼠没有盲肠附件,也没有基于“回冲”的结肠分离机制。在没有特定位置模式的情况下,它们的 GIT 中积累的沙子较少,并且在该物种中,先前饮食的影响较小。在研究过程中,没有兔子或豚鼠出现梗阻的临床症状,并且记录的沙子量代表兔子 14 天沙摄入量的 1.0±1.2%,豚鼠的 0.2±0.2%。在兔子的 GIT 中积累高达 10cm 的沙子似乎不会引起临床健康损害。兔子的个体间差异较大,表明个体间沙子积累的易感性存在差异。对于那些由于其挖掘生活方式和靠近地面进食而注定会意外摄入沙子的动物,盲肠附件中存在的沙子陷阱的原因仍有待揭示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec0/9298143/c02445645299/JMOR-283-5-g011.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验