Busuioc Madalina
Leiden University.
Public Adm Rev. 2021 Sep-Oct;81(5):825-836. doi: 10.1111/puar.13293. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms govern in subtle yet fundamental ways the way we live and are transforming our societies. The promise of efficient, low-cost, or "neutral" solutions harnessing the potential of big data has led public bodies to adopt algorithmic systems in the provision of public services. As AI algorithms have permeated high-stakes aspects of our public existence-from hiring and education decisions to the governmental use of enforcement powers (policing) or liberty-restricting decisions (bail and sentencing)-this necessarily raises important accountability questions: What accountability challenges do AI algorithmic systems bring with them, and how can we safeguard accountability in algorithmic decision-making? Drawing on a decidedly public administration perspective, and given the current challenges that have thus far become manifest in the field, we critically reflect on and map out in a conceptually guided manner the implications of these systems, and the limitations they pose, for public accountability.
人工智能(AI)算法正以微妙而根本的方式支配着我们的生活,并正在改变我们的社会。利用大数据潜力的高效、低成本或“中立”解决方案的前景,促使公共机构在提供公共服务时采用算法系统。随着人工智能算法渗透到我们公共生活的高风险领域——从招聘和教育决策到政府对执法权力的使用(治安)或限制自由的决策(保释和量刑)——这必然引发了重要的问责问题:人工智能算法系统带来了哪些问责挑战,以及我们如何在算法决策中保障问责制?从明确的公共行政角度出发,鉴于该领域目前已显现出的挑战,我们批判性地反思并以概念性引导的方式梳理出这些系统对公共问责制的影响以及它们所带来的局限性。