• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

收入不平等与精英主义信念的缓和功能之间的关系:微观和宏观层面都很重要。

The Relationship Between Income Inequality and the Palliative Function of Meritocracy Belief: The Micro- and the Macro-Levels Both Count.

作者信息

Hadarics Márton, Kende Anna, Szabó Zsolt Péter

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Department of Ergonomics and Psychology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 8;12:709080. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709080. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709080
PMID:34690865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8531093/
Abstract

In the current paper, we report the analysis of the relationship between meritocracy belief and subjective well-being using two large international databases, the ( = 44,387) and the ( = 51,752), involving data gathered from 36 countries in total. We investigated whether low status individuals are more likely to psychologically benefit from endorsing meritocratic beliefs, and the same benefits are more pronounced in more unequal societies. Since meritocracy belief can function as a justification for income differences, we assumed that the harsher the objective reality is, the higher level of subjective well-being can be maintained by justifying this harsh reality. Therefore, we hypothesized that the palliative function of meritocracy belief is stronger for both low social status (low income) individuals, and for those living in an unequal social environment (in countries with larger income differences). Our multilevel models showed a positive relationship between meritocracy belief and subjective well-being, which relationship was moderated by both individual-level income status and country-level income differences in both studies. Based on these results, we concluded that the emotional payoff of justifying income inequalities is larger if one is more strongly affected by these inequalities.

摘要

在当前论文中,我们报告了利用两个大型国际数据库(即[具体数据库1],样本量(n = 44387);以及[具体数据库2],样本量(n = 51752))对精英主义信念与主观幸福感之间关系的分析,这些数据总共来自36个国家。我们研究了地位较低的个体是否更有可能从认可精英主义信念中获得心理益处,以及在社会不平等程度更高的社会中这种益处是否更为显著。由于精英主义信念可以作为收入差异的一种正当理由,我们假设客观现实越严峻,通过为这种严峻现实提供正当理由就能维持越高水平的主观幸福感。因此,我们假设精英主义信念的缓和功能对于社会地位较低(低收入)的个体以及生活在不平等社会环境(收入差异较大的国家)中的个体而言更强。我们的多层次模型显示,在两项研究中,精英主义信念与主观幸福感之间均存在正相关关系,且这种关系受到个体层面的收入状况以及国家层面的收入差异的调节。基于这些结果,我们得出结论:如果一个人受收入不平等的影响越大,为收入不平等提供正当理由所带来的情感回报就越大。

相似文献

1
The Relationship Between Income Inequality and the Palliative Function of Meritocracy Belief: The Micro- and the Macro-Levels Both Count.收入不平等与精英主义信念的缓和功能之间的关系:微观和宏观层面都很重要。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 8;12:709080. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709080. eCollection 2021.
2
The paradox of local inequality: Meritocratic beliefs in unequal localities.地方不平等悖论:不平等地方的精英主义信仰。
Br J Sociol. 2022 Mar;73(2):421-460. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12930. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
3
Belief in school meritocracy as a system-justifying tool for low status students.将学校精英制度视为地位较低学生的一种制度正当化工具的信念。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 30;6:1053. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01053. eCollection 2015.
4
Does belief in meritocracy increase with inequality? A reconsideration for European countries.对精英统治的信念会随着不平等加剧而增强吗?对欧洲国家的重新审视。
Br J Sociol. 2023 Dec;74(5):763-780. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13042. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
5
Belief in School Meritocracy and the Legitimization of Social and Income Inequality.对学校精英制度的信仰以及社会和收入不平等的合法化。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2023 Jun;14(5):621-635. doi: 10.1177/19485506221111017. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
6
Is the Belief in Meritocracy Palliative for Members of Low Status Groups? Evidence for a Benefit for Self-Esteem and Physical Health via Perceived Control.对精英统治的信念对低地位群体成员有缓解作用吗?通过感知控制对自尊和身体健康有益的证据。
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jun;43(4):307-318. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1959.
7
Country-Level Meritocratic Beliefs Moderate the Social Gradient in Adolescent Mental Health: A Multilevel Study in 30 European Countries.国家层面的精英信念对青少年心理健康的社会梯度具有调节作用:30 个欧洲国家的多层次研究。
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Mar;68(3):548-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.06.031. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
8
'Where there is a will, there is a way': Belief in school meritocracy and the social-class achievement gap.有志者事竟成:对学校精英主义的信仰与社会阶层成就差距。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Jan;57(1):250-262. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12214. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
9
Macro-level determinants of young people's subjective health and health inequalities: a multilevel analysis in 27 welfare states.年轻人主观健康及健康不平等的宏观层面决定因素:对27个福利国家的多层次分析
Maturitas. 2015 Apr;80(4):414-20. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
10
System justification enhances well-being: A longitudinal analysis of the palliative function of system justification in 18 countries.系统合理化增强幸福感:18 个国家系统合理化的临终关怀功能的纵向分析。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Jul;57(3):567-590. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12254. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Threats in the Support of System-Justifying Beliefs.威胁在支持系统正当化信念中的作用。
Psychol Russ. 2025 Jun 1;18(2):113-128. doi: 10.11621/pir.2025.0207. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Primes and Consequences: A Systematic Review of Meritocracy in Intergroup Relations.优势与后果:群体间关系中精英主义的系统综述
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 19;10:2007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02007. eCollection 2019.
2
"We Look (and Feel) Better Through System-Justifying Lenses": System-Justifying Beliefs Attenuate the Well-Being Gap Between the Advantaged and Disadvantaged by Reducing Perceptions of Discrimination.“通过正义化系统的视角,我们看起来(感觉起来)更好”:通过减少对歧视的感知,正义化系统的信念减弱了优势群体和弱势群体之间的幸福感差距。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Sep;45(9):1391-1408. doi: 10.1177/0146167219829178. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
3
Movin' on Up? How Perceptions of Social Mobility Affect Our Willingness to Defend the System.向上流动?社会流动观念如何影响我们捍卫现有体系的意愿。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 Apr;8(3):267-274. doi: 10.1177/1948550616678454. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
4
A default prior for regression coefficients.回归系数的默认先验。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3799-3807. doi: 10.1177/0962280218817792. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Revisiting 25 years of system motivation explanation for system justification from the perspective of social identity model of system attitudes.从系统态度的社会认同模型视角重新审视25年来对系统正当性的系统动机解释。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Oct 17. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12285.
6
The Palliative Effects of System Justification on the Health and Happiness of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Individuals.系统论证对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者的健康和幸福的缓解作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Mar;45(3):372-388. doi: 10.1177/0146167218785156. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
7
System justification enhances well-being: A longitudinal analysis of the palliative function of system justification in 18 countries.系统合理化增强幸福感:18 个国家系统合理化的临终关怀功能的纵向分析。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Jul;57(3):567-590. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12254. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
8
The Palliative Function of Hostile Sexism among High and Low-Status Chilean Students.智利高低地位学生中敌对性性别歧视的姑息功能
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 4;8:1733. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01733. eCollection 2017.
9
For Better or Worse? System-Justifying Beliefs in Sixth-Grade Predict Trajectories of Self-Esteem and Behavior Across Early Adolescence.好或坏?六年级的公正系统信念预测了整个青少年早期的自尊和行为轨迹。
Child Dev. 2019 Jan;90(1):180-195. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12854. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
The sigh of the oppressed: The palliative effects of ideology are stronger for people living in highly unequal neighbourhoods.被压迫者的叹息:生活在高度不平等社区的人们,意识形态的缓和作用更强。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Sep;56(3):437-454. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12192. Epub 2017 Mar 16.