Bartram David
University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Br J Sociol. 2023 Dec;74(5):763-780. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13042. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
Recent research finds that higher inequality reinforces a tendency to see inequality as legitimate, via beliefs about meritocracy. That pattern appears in a cross-sectional analysis-but it is seemingly evident also in a longitudinal analysis: an increase in inequality apparently leads to a stronger perception of a meritocratic process. I reconsider that finding here via an analysis that uses (1) a different set of countries, (2) a different time-period, and (3) different measures of inequality and beliefs about meritocracy. Using data from the European Social Survey on 17 countries from 2008 to 2016, I present results that are in tension with earlier research: an increase in inequality leads people to disagree more strongly with a core meritocratic principle-that is, the idea that large differences in incomes are needed to reward talents and effort.
近期研究发现,更高程度的不平等会通过关于精英统治的信念,强化将不平等视为合理的倾向。这种模式在横断面分析中有所体现——但在纵向分析中似乎也很明显:不平等的加剧显然会导致对精英统治过程的认知更加强烈。我在此通过一项分析重新审视这一发现,该分析使用了(1)不同的国家组,(2)不同的时间段,以及(3)不平等和关于精英统治信念的不同衡量标准。利用2008年至2016年欧洲社会调查中17个国家的数据,我得出的结果与早期研究存在矛盾:不平等的加剧会导致人们更强烈地反对一项核心的精英统治原则,即认为需要巨大的收入差异来奖励才能和努力的观点。