• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对学校精英制度的信仰以及社会和收入不平等的合法化。

Belief in School Meritocracy and the Legitimization of Social and Income Inequality.

作者信息

Batruch Anatolia, Jetten Jolanda, Van de Werfhorst Herman, Darnon Céline, Butera Fabrizio

机构信息

Université de Lausanne, Switzerland.

The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.

出版信息

Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2023 Jun;14(5):621-635. doi: 10.1177/19485506221111017. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1177/19485506221111017
PMID:37223669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10201081/
Abstract

Educational institutions are imbued with an institutional meritocratic discourse: only merit counts for academic success. In this article, we study whether this institutional belief has an impact beyond its primary function of encouraging students to study. We propose that belief in school meritocracy has broader societal impact by legitimizing the social class hierarchy it produces and encouraging the maintenance of inequalities. The results of four studies (one correlational study, = 198; one experiment, = 198; and two international data surveys, = 88,421 in 40+countries) indicate that belief in school meritocracy reduces the perceived unfairness of social class inequality in society, support for affirmative action policies at university and support for policies aimed at reducing income inequality. Together, these studies show that the belief that schools are meritocratic carries consequences beyond the school context as it is associated with attitudes that maintain social class and economic inequality.

摘要

教育机构充斥着一种制度性的精英主义话语

只有功绩才是学术成功的关键。在本文中,我们研究这种制度性信念是否会产生超出其鼓励学生学习的主要功能的影响。我们认为,对学校精英主义的信念通过使其产生的社会阶层等级制度合法化并鼓励不平等的持续存在,从而具有更广泛的社会影响。四项研究(一项相关性研究,N = 198;一项实验,N = 198;以及两项国际数据调查,40多个国家的N = 88,421)的结果表明,对学校精英主义的信念降低了人们对社会阶层不平等的感知不公平性、对大学平权行动政策的支持以及对旨在减少收入不平等政策的支持。这些研究共同表明,认为学校是精英主义的信念所带来的影响超出了学校范围,因为它与维持社会阶层和经济不平等的态度相关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/c1aad926a4a4/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/cb6636aafc22/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/a0602d769c44/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/f2ede0107552/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/94de935f3df6/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/63d9f52beab6/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/c1aad926a4a4/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/cb6636aafc22/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/a0602d769c44/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/f2ede0107552/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/94de935f3df6/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/63d9f52beab6/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/10201081/c1aad926a4a4/10.1177_19485506221111017-fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Belief in School Meritocracy and the Legitimization of Social and Income Inequality.对学校精英制度的信仰以及社会和收入不平等的合法化。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2023 Jun;14(5):621-635. doi: 10.1177/19485506221111017. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
'Where there is a will, there is a way': Belief in school meritocracy and the social-class achievement gap.有志者事竟成:对学校精英主义的信仰与社会阶层成就差距。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Jan;57(1):250-262. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12214. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
3
The Relationship Between Income Inequality and the Palliative Function of Meritocracy Belief: The Micro- and the Macro-Levels Both Count.收入不平等与精英主义信念的缓和功能之间的关系:微观和宏观层面都很重要。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 8;12:709080. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709080. eCollection 2021.
4
The paradox of local inequality: Meritocratic beliefs in unequal localities.地方不平等悖论:不平等地方的精英主义信仰。
Br J Sociol. 2022 Mar;73(2):421-460. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12930. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
Does belief in meritocracy increase with inequality? A reconsideration for European countries.对精英统治的信念会随着不平等加剧而增强吗?对欧洲国家的重新审视。
Br J Sociol. 2023 Dec;74(5):763-780. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13042. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
6
Belief in school meritocracy as a system-justifying tool for low status students.将学校精英制度视为地位较低学生的一种制度正当化工具的信念。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 30;6:1053. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01053. eCollection 2015.
7
Social justice in education: how the function of selection in educational institutions predicts support for (non)egalitarian assessment practices.教育中的社会正义:教育机构选拔功能如何预测对(非)平等主义评估实践的支持。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 4;6:707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00707. eCollection 2015.
8
Can cognitive dissonance explain beliefs regarding meritocracy?认知失调能否解释关于精英主义的信仰?
Soc Sci Res. 2024 Mar;119:102980. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.102980. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
9
Income inequality and school bullying: multilevel study of adolescents in 37 countries.收入不平等与校园欺凌:37 个国家青少年的多层次研究
J Adolesc Health. 2009 Oct;45(4):351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
10
Income Inequality or Performance Gap? A Multilevel Study of School Violence in 52 Countries.收入不平等还是绩效差距?对52个国家校园暴力的多层次研究。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Nov;57(5):545-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Seeing is believing: believing in a just world reduces perceived inequality.眼见为实:相信世界是公平的会减少对不平等的感知。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 31;16:1531682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1531682. eCollection 2025.
2
The development and validation of the Decent Education Scale and the Retrospective Decent Education Scale.体面教育量表及回顾性体面教育量表的编制与验证
J Couns Psychol. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1037/cou0000815.
3
Believing that social change is possible: Collective efficacy to promote engagement and mobilization of non-Roma as allies.
相信社会变革是可能的:促进非罗姆人作为盟友参与和动员的集体效能。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e12895. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12895.
4
A qualitative study of Chinese teacher's perceptions and practices of meritocracy.一项关于中国教师对精英主义的认知与实践的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0321424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321424. eCollection 2025.
5
(Not) one of us: The overrepresentation of elites in politics erodes political trust.我们之中无人(参与):政治领域精英的过度代表削弱了政治信任。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12885. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12885.
6
Meritocratic beliefs in the United States, Finland, and China: A multidimensional approach using latent class analysis.美国、芬兰和中国的精英主义信念:一种使用潜在类别分析的多维度方法。
Br J Sociol. 2025 Jan;76(1):153-172. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13152. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
7
Challenging assumptions: "unveiling meritocracy's reality in neurosurgery".挑战假设:“揭示神经外科领域精英管理的现实”
Front Surg. 2024 Jul 16;11:1423999. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1423999. eCollection 2024.