Ma Jun, Yang Jiani, Cheng Shanshan, Jin Yue, Zhang Nan, Wang Chao, Wang Yu
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Sep;16(3):587-596. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.106081. Epub 2021 May 14.
Minimally invasive surgery has been widely used in gynecology. The laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) risk prediction model can provide evidence-based references for preoperative surgical procedure selection.
To determine whether the patients are suitable for LESS and to provide guidance for the clinical operation plan, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of LESS and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in gynecology. We constructed a LESS risk prediction model and predicted surgical conditions for the preoperative evaluation system.
A retrospective analysis was carried out among patients undergoing LESS (n = 1019) and CLS (n = 1055). Various clinical indicators were compared. Multiple machine model algorithms were evaluated. The optimal results were chosen as the model to form the risk prediction model.
The LESS group showed advantages in the postoperative 12/24 h visual analog scale and Vancouver scar score compared with the CLS group (p < 0.05). The comparisons in other clinical indicators between the two groups showed that each group had advantages and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05), including operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay. We evaluated the predictive value for various models using AUC values of 0.77, 0.77, 0.76, and 0.67 for XGBoost, random forest, GBDT, and logistic regression, respectively. The decision tree model was shown to be the optimal model.
LESS can reduce postoperative pain, shorten hospital stay and make scars acceptable. The risk prediction model based on a machine learning algorithm has manifested a high degree of accuracy and can satisfy the doctors' demand for individualized preoperative evaluation and surgical safety in LESS.
微创手术已在妇科广泛应用。腹腔镜单孔手术(LESS)风险预测模型可为术前手术方案选择提供循证参考。
为确定患者是否适合LESS并为临床手术计划提供指导,我们旨在比较LESS与传统腹腔镜手术(CLS)在妇科的临床结局。我们构建了LESS风险预测模型,并为术前评估系统预测手术情况。
对接受LESS(n = 1019)和CLS(n = 1055)的患者进行回顾性分析。比较了各种临床指标。评估了多种机器学习算法模型。选择最优结果作为模型以形成风险预测模型。
与CLS组相比,LESS组在术后12/24小时视觉模拟评分和温哥华瘢痕评分方面显示出优势(p < 0.05)。两组其他临床指标的比较表明,每组都有优势且差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.05),包括手术时间、估计失血量和住院时间。我们分别使用XGBoost、随机森林、梯度提升决策树(GBDT)和逻辑回归的AUC值0.77、0.77、0.76和0.67评估了各种模型的预测价值。决策树模型被证明是最优模型。
LESS可减轻术后疼痛,缩短住院时间并使瘢痕可接受。基于机器学习算法的风险预测模型已显示出高度准确性,并且可以满足医生对LESS个体化术前评估和手术安全性的需求。