Chen Dong-Yi, Chen Chun-Chi, Tseng Chi-Nan, Chen Shao-Wei, Chang Shang-Hung, Huang Wen-Kuan, Wen Ming-Shien, Hsieh Ming-Jer, Hsieh I-Chang
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Cardio-Oncology Program, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Oct 8;41:101149. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101149. eCollection 2021 Nov.
The effectiveness and safety of initiating sacubitril/valsartan therapy among patients who are hospitalized for acute heart failure (HF) is unclear.
A cohort of 3736 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) hospitalized for acute HF was identified from Chang Gung Research Database between January 1, 2016 and August 31, 2019. The risks of rehospitalization for HF and death associated with sacubitril/valsartan therapy compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) therapy were evaluated. We used stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the baseline covariates. The risks of fatal and non-fatal outcomes between the groups were compared using a Cox proportional hazard model and Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard model, respectively.
The composite of rehospitalization for HF and death occurred in 22.9% of the patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group compared to 32.6% in the ACEI/ARB group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.97) after a mean follow-up period of 11.8 months. The sacubitril/valsartan group had a lower risk of rehospitalization for HF (subdistribution HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.92) and all-cause death (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.94). There were no significant differences in the rates of worsening renal function or severe hyperkalemia between the two groups.
In real-world practice, initiating sacubitril/valsartan therapy among patients with HFrEF who were hospitalized for acute HF was associated with a lower rate of rehospitalization for HF and death compared with ACEI/ARB therapy.
This study was supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals.
对于因急性心力衰竭(HF)住院的患者,启动沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的有效性和安全性尚不清楚。
从长庚研究数据库中确定了2016年1月1日至2019年8月31日期间因急性HF住院的3736例射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者队列。评估了与沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗相比,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗相关的HF再住院风险和死亡风险。我们使用稳定的治疗权重逆概率来平衡基线协变量。分别使用Cox比例风险模型和Fine和Gray亚分布风险模型比较两组之间致命和非致命结局的风险。
在平均随访11.8个月后,沙库巴曲缬沙坦组22.9%的患者发生了HF再住院和死亡的复合事件,而ACEI/ARB组为32.6%(风险比[HR] 0.71,95%置信区间[CI] 0.52 - 0.97)。沙库巴曲缬沙坦组HF再住院风险(亚分布HR 0.83,95% CI 0.74 - 0.92)和全因死亡风险(HR 0.51,95% CI 0.27 - 0.94)较低。两组之间肾功能恶化或严重高钾血症的发生率没有显著差异。
在实际临床实践中,与ACEI/ARB治疗相比,对于因急性HF住院的HFrEF患者启动沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗与较低的HF再住院率和死亡率相关。
本研究由诺华制药公司资助。