• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Investigating the impacts of personality on the use and perceptions of online collaborative platforms in higher education.探究个性对高等教育中在线协作平台的使用及认知的影响。
SN Soc Sci. 2021;1(1):40. doi: 10.1007/s43545-020-00053-x. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
2
Text presentation or video: Malaysian university students' preferences with synchronous and asynchronous learning.文本展示或视频:马来西亚大学生对同步和异步学习的偏好
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 May 4:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11796-4.
3
Collaborative group work: university students' perceptions and experiences before and during COVID-19.小组合作学习:大学生在新冠疫情前后的认知与体验
SN Soc Sci. 2023;3(6):86. doi: 10.1007/s43545-023-00670-2. Epub 2023 May 23.
4
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
5
Beyond Collaborative Learning: a Comparison of Small Groups in Face-to-Face and Online Settings.超越协作学习:面对面与在线环境下小组的比较
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Jan 15;34(2):379-385. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-01983-4. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Which nursing students are more ready for interprofessional learning? A cross-sectional study.哪些护理专业的学生更适合开展跨专业学习?一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Aug;79:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 May 10.
7
The role of personal resilience and personality traits of healthcare students on their attitudes towards interprofessional collaboration.医护专业学生的个人复原力和性格特质对其跨专业合作态度的作用。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Feb;61:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
8
Responding to Covid-19: A thematic analysis of students' perspectives on modified learning activities during an emergency transition to remote human anatomy education.应对新冠疫情:对学生在紧急过渡到远程人体解剖学教育期间对修改后的学习活动的看法的专题分析。
Anat Sci Educ. 2021 Nov;14(6):721-738. doi: 10.1002/ase.2136.
9
Student perceptions of online and in-person microbiology laboratory experiences in undergraduate medical education.本科医学教育中,学生对线上和线下微生物学实验室体验的看法。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1710324. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1710324.
10
Agreeableness, extraversion and life satisfaction: Investigating the mediating roles of social inclusion and status.宜人性、外向性与生活满意度:探究社会包容与地位的中介作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2021 Oct;62(5):752-762. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12755. Epub 2021 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of School Closures on Learning and Mental Health of Children: Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic.学校关闭对儿童学习和心理健康的影响:来自新冠疫情的教训
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jul;19(4):686-693. doi: 10.1177/17456916231181108. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Examining the relationship of personality traits with online teaching using emotive responses and physiological signals.通过情感反应和生理信号研究人格特质与在线教学之间的关系。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 Feb 14:1-27. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11619-6.
3
Application of Dance Movement Therapy to Life-Death Education of College Students Under Educational Psychology.教育心理学视域下舞蹈动作治疗在大学生生死教育中的应用
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 5;13:782771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.782771. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Personality characteristics that are valued in teams: Not always "more is better"?团队中受重视的人格特征:并非“越多越好”?
Int J Psychol. 2019 Oct;54(5):638-649. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12511. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
2
Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis.深层成分变量作为团队绩效的预测指标:一项元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 May;92(3):595-615. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.595.
3
Personality and online/offline choices: MBTI profiles and favored communication modes in a Singapore study.人格与线上/线下选择:新加坡一项研究中的MBTI人格类型及偏好的沟通方式
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006 Feb;9(1):5-13. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.5.
4
"On the Internet no one knows I'm an introvert": extroversion, neuroticism, and Internet interaction.“在互联网上没人知道我是个内向的人”:外向性、神经质与网络互动
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2002 Apr;5(2):125-8. doi: 10.1089/109493102753770507.
5
Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality.自我管理团队中的组成、过程与绩效:个性的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 1997 Feb;82(1):62-78. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.62.
6
The relationships between personality, study methods and academic performance.个性、学习方法与学业成绩之间的关系。
Br J Educ Psychol. 1970 Jun;40(2):132-43. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1970.tb02113.x.
7
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.压力、社会支持与缓冲假说。
Psychol Bull. 1985 Sep;98(2):310-57.
8
Social learning theory of aggression.攻击行为的社会学习理论。
J Commun. 1978 Summer;28(3):12-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x.

探究个性对高等教育中在线协作平台的使用及认知的影响。

Investigating the impacts of personality on the use and perceptions of online collaborative platforms in higher education.

作者信息

Borg Meghan E, Butterfield Kaitlyn M, Wood Eileen, Zhang Huan Huan, Pinto Sabrina

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5 Canada.

出版信息

SN Soc Sci. 2021;1(1):40. doi: 10.1007/s43545-020-00053-x. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1007/s43545-020-00053-x
PMID:34693305
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7847746/
Abstract

Collaborative work is a critical component of active learning. Where in-person collaboration may not be possible, inclusion of online collaboration tools has become more prevalent. Previous studies have suggested that online collaboration is beneficial to overall learning outcomes; however, little research has investigated how differences in personality traits, such as extraversion and agreeableness, impact the benefits and effectiveness of collaborative learning, both through online (synchronous and asynchronous) and in-person platforms. In the present study, 360 (66.4% female) undergraduate students completed an online survey to assess perceptions of and beliefs about online synchronous, online asynchronous, and in-person collaboration in higher education with a focus on the impact of extraversion and agreeableness. Findings indicated that students had more experience and greater preference for online synchronous collaboration compared to online asynchronous collaboration; however, students believed that in-person collaboration was most effective. Both extraversion and agreeableness predicted positive beliefs about group work in both online and in-person settings but not uniformly. These findings support the use of online synchronous collaboration when in-person opportunities are limited; however, individual differences related to personality traits can differentially impact students' perceptions toward and actions within collaboration contexts.

摘要

合作学习是主动学习的关键组成部分。在无法进行面对面合作的情况下,在线合作工具的使用变得更加普遍。先前的研究表明,在线合作有利于整体学习成果;然而,很少有研究调查外向性和宜人性等人格特质的差异如何通过在线(同步和异步)和面对面平台影响合作学习的益处和有效性。在本研究中,360名本科生(66.4%为女性)完成了一项在线调查,以评估对高等教育中在线同步、在线异步和面对面合作的看法和信念,重点关注外向性和宜人性的影响。研究结果表明,与在线异步合作相比,学生们有更多的在线同步合作经验,且更倾向于在线同步合作;然而,学生们认为面对面合作最有效。外向性和宜人性都预测了对在线和面对面环境中团队合作的积极信念,但并非一致。这些研究结果支持在面对面机会有限时使用在线同步合作;然而,与人格特质相关的个体差异会对学生在合作环境中的看法和行为产生不同的影响。