• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Beyond Collaborative Learning: a Comparison of Small Groups in Face-to-Face and Online Settings.超越协作学习:面对面与在线环境下小组的比较
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Jan 15;34(2):379-385. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-01983-4. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Pharmacy students' perceptions and attitudes toward face-to-face vs. virtual team-based learning (TBL) in the didactic curriculum: A mixed-methods study.药学专业学生对理论课程中面对面与虚拟团队学习(TBL)的看法和态度:一项混合方法研究。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2226851. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2226851.
3
Scaffolding medical student knowledge and skills: team-based learning (TBL) and case-based learning (CBL).搭建医学生的知识与技能体系:基于团队的学习(TBL)和基于案例的学习(CBL)。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02638-3.
4
A comparative study on the effectiveness of online and in-class team-based learning on student performance and perceptions in virtual simulation experiments.在线与课堂团队学习在虚拟模拟实验中学生表现和认知效果的比较研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 12;24(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05080-3.
5
A mixed methods, longitudinal study: characterizing the differences in engagement and perceived learning of medical students in online and in-person team-based learning classes.一项混合方法的纵向研究:刻画医学生在在线和面对面小组合作学习课程中的参与度和感知学习差异。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Feb 12;13:33. doi: 10.12688/mep.19535.2. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparing Case-Based with Team-Based Learning: Dental Students' Satisfaction, Level of Learning, and Resources Needed.基于案例与团队学习的比较:牙科学学生的满意度、学习水平和所需资源。
J Dent Educ. 2020 Apr;84(4):486-494. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.190.
7
Does Online Interprofessional Case-Based Learning Facilitate Collaborative Knowledge Construction?基于案例的在线跨专业学习是否有助于协作性知识建构?
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Jan 12;16:85-99. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S391997. eCollection 2023.
8
Professionalism in small group learning between face-to-face and virtual settings: a mixed-methods study.面对面与虚拟环境下小组学习的专业性:混合方法研究。
Int J Med Educ. 2023 Mar 31;14:36-42. doi: 10.5116/ijme.6413.4ecd.
9
A new attempt of applying hybrid team-based and case-based learning approach in dental materials science: Does it work?一种新的尝试:将基于团队的混合学习和基于案例的学习方法应用于口腔材料科学:它有效吗?
Eur J Dent Educ. 2023 Nov;27(4):956-962. doi: 10.1111/eje.12887. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
10
Remote-online case-based learning: A comparison of remote-online and face-to-face, case-based learning - a randomized controlled trial.远程在线案例式学习:远程在线与面对面案例式学习的比较——一项随机对照试验。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2016 Sep-Dec;29(3):195-202. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.204213.

引用本文的文献

1
Thinking About the Why: A Qualitative Study on Students' Perspectives of Paediatric Team-Based Learning Discussions.思考原因:关于学生对儿科小组协作学习讨论看法的定性研究
Clin Teach. 2025 Oct;22(5):e70161. doi: 10.1111/tct.70161.
2
Team-based learning versus traditional lectures in local anesthesia course: A cross-sectional study exploring dental students' perception and performance.局部麻醉课程中基于团队的学习与传统讲座的比较:一项探索牙科学生认知与表现的横断面研究
Saudi J Anaesth. 2025 Jul-Sep;19(3):266-270. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_582_24. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
3
Blending Online and In-Person Seminars to Strengthen Clinical Placement Learning in Physiotherapy Education.融合线上与线下研讨会以加强物理治疗教育中的临床实习学习
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Apr 4;16:557-567. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S502590. eCollection 2025.
4
Student feedback on team-based learning in a preclinical oral surgery course: A pilot study.临床前口腔外科课程中基于团队学习的学生反馈:一项试点研究。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2024 Jun 15;19(4):705-710. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2024.06.002. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
From the inverted classroom to the online lecture hall: Effects on students' satisfaction and exam results.从翻转课堂到在线讲堂:对学生满意度和考试成绩的影响。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2022 Sep;50(5):483-493. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21650. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
2
Medical Education From a Theory-Practice-Philosophy Perspective.从理论-实践-哲学视角看医学教育
Acad Pathol. 2021 Apr 20;8:23742895211010236. doi: 10.1177/23742895211010236. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
Lectures and collaborative working improves the performance of medical students.讲座和协作工作提高医学生的表现。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2021 Jan 1;45(1):18-23. doi: 10.1152/advan.00121.2020.
4
A Review of Flipped Classroom and Cooperative Learning Method Within the Context of Vygotsky Theory.维果茨基理论背景下的翻转课堂与合作学习方法综述
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 3;11:1157. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01157. eCollection 2020.
5
Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在线学习是否优于本科医学教育中的离线学习?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1666538. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538.
6
The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review.同伴反馈在本科医学教育中的协作学习中的应用:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 23;19(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1755-z.
7
Case-Based Learning and its Application in Medical and Health-Care Fields: A Review of Worldwide Literature.基于案例的学习及其在医疗卫生领域的应用:全球文献综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016 Apr 27;3. doi: 10.4137/JMECD.S20377. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.
8
A systematic review of the published literature on team-based learning in health professions education.对已发表的关于卫生专业教育中基于团队学习的文献的系统综述。
Med Teach. 2017 Dec;39(12):1227-1237. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1340636. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
9
Motivation of medical students: selection by motivation or motivation by selection.医学生的动机:因动机而选拔还是因选拔而产生动机。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 29;16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0560-1.
10
Assessing the Effectiveness of Case-Based Collaborative Learning via Randomized Controlled Trial.通过随机对照试验评估基于案例的协作学习的有效性。
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):723-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001004.

超越协作学习:面对面与在线环境下小组的比较

Beyond Collaborative Learning: a Comparison of Small Groups in Face-to-Face and Online Settings.

作者信息

Song Xiaomei, Elftman Michael

机构信息

School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 9501 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-7503 USA.

College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2024 Jan 15;34(2):379-385. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-01983-4. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-024-01983-4
PMID:38686170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11055808/
Abstract

Small group-based instructional approaches such as case-based learning (CBL) and team-based learning (TBL) are widely used in medical education to promote collaboration and team learning. During the pandemic, many medical schools shifted from face-to-face instruction to online settings. While CBL/TBL are intended to foster collaborative skills, it is unclear how its use evolves in an online setting and whether the online setting impacts students' perceptions and behaviors in collaboration. This study examined how the change from in-person to online CBL/TBL impacted students' collaboration. We used a mixed-methods sequential design, first collecting and analyzing retrospective cohort quantitative data with the Class of 2023 through peer evaluation surveys followed by six focus groups. Students' assessment of their peers was generally positive. Nonparametric testing showed significant differences for two questions with less positive perceptions in the virtual setting compared to when students had in-person CBL/TBL. The focus group results identified several themes related to collaboration and learning communities. In the virtual setting, students not only lost collaboration opportunities with their group members in CBL/TBL, but also learning opportunities and social connections with other groups and the community as a whole. Virtual learning environments may have presented challenges for collaborative learning and the establishment of a sense of community.

摘要

基于小组的教学方法,如基于案例的学习(CBL)和基于团队的学习(TBL),在医学教育中被广泛应用,以促进协作和团队学习。在疫情期间,许多医学院从面对面教学转向了在线教学。虽然CBL/TBL旨在培养协作技能,但尚不清楚其在在线环境中的使用方式如何演变,以及在线环境是否会影响学生在协作中的认知和行为。本研究考察了从面对面CBL/TBL转变为在线CBL/TBL如何影响学生的协作。我们采用了混合方法序列设计,首先通过同伴评估调查收集并分析了2023届学生的回顾性队列定量数据,随后进行了六个焦点小组访谈。学生对同伴的评价总体上是积极的。非参数检验显示,与进行面对面CBL/TBL时相比,在虚拟环境中有两个问题的评价不那么积极,存在显著差异。焦点小组访谈结果确定了几个与协作和学习社区相关的主题。在虚拟环境中,学生不仅失去了在CBL/TBL中与小组成员的协作机会,还失去了与其他小组以及整个社区的学习机会和社交联系。虚拟学习环境可能给协作学习和建立社区意识带来了挑战。