Suppr超能文献

肾结石粉末化:激光方式、输尿管通路鞘及抽吸对结石完全清除率的影响

Renal Stone Dusting: Impact of Laser Modality, Ureteral Access Sheath, and Suction on Total Stone Clearance.

作者信息

Jiang Pengbo, Peta Akhil, Brevik Andrew, Arada Raphael B, Ayad Maged, Afyouni Andrew S, Limfueco Luke, Nguyen Nicholas, Palma Anton, Patel Roshan M, Landman Jaime, Clayman Ralph V

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.

Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Research Design Unit, Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2022 Apr;36(4):499-507. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0544.

Abstract

Conventional renal stone dusting is challenging; the holmium (Ho:YAG) laser and holmium with effect (Ho:YAG-) fail to uniformly produce fragments ≤100 μm (i.e., dust). The superpulse thulium fiber laser (sTFL) may more effectively render uroliths into "dust," and may thus improve stone-free rates. Accordingly, we performed evaluations with all three laser modalities, assessing stone fragments and stone clearance. Seventy-two porcine kidney-ureter models were divided into 12 groups of 6: laser type (Ho:YAG, Ho:YAG-, sTFL), ureteroscope with and without applied suction, and the presence or absence of a 14F ureteral access sheath (UAS). Calcium oxalate stones were preweighed and implanted into each kidney via a pyelotomy. Stones were treated at 16W using dusting settings of 0.4J × 40Hz (Ho:YAG), 0.2J × 80Hz (Ho:YAG-), and 0.2J × 80Hz (sTFL) for up to 20 minutes. No stone basketing was performed. Kidneys were bivalved and residual fragments were collected, dried, weighed, and sieved to determine fragment size and stone clearance. Initial stone mass (mg), procedure time (seconds), and laser energy expenditure (kJ) were similar in all 12 groups. The greatest stone clearance was seen with sTFL + suction + UAS (94%) compared with a conventional technique (Ho:YAG + no suction + no UAS) (65%,  < 0.01). The use of sTFL provided greater stone clearance than Ho:YAG or Ho:YAG-. Aspiration improved stone clearance for sTFL ( = 0.01), but not for Ho:YAG or Ho:YAG-, consistent with the creation of smaller fragments with sTFL. Presence of a 14F UAS improved stone clearance in all scenarios ( < 0.01). In this study, stone clearance was optimized under the following conditions: sTFL, 14F UAS, and aspiration. This combination resulted in 94% of stone fragments being cleared; the 6% remaining fragments were all <2 mm. In all scenarios, deployment of a 14F UAS improved stone clearance.

摘要

传统的肾结石粉末化处理具有挑战性;钬(Ho:YAG)激光和带效应的钬(Ho:YAG-)无法均匀产生≤100μm的碎片(即粉末)。超脉冲铥光纤激光(sTFL)可能更有效地将尿路结石变成“粉末”,从而提高结石清除率。因此,我们使用这三种激光模式进行了评估,评估结石碎片和结石清除情况。72个猪肾输尿管模型被分为12组,每组6个:激光类型(Ho:YAG、Ho:YAG-、sTFL)、有无应用吸引装置的输尿管镜以及有无14F输尿管通路鞘(UAS)。草酸钙结石预先称重,通过肾盂切开术植入每个肾脏。使用0.4J×40Hz(Ho:YAG)、0.2J×80Hz(Ho:YAG-)和0.2J×80Hz(sTFL)的粉末化设置,以16W的功率对结石进行治疗,最长治疗20分钟。未进行结石篮取操作。将肾脏切成两半,收集残留碎片,干燥、称重并过筛,以确定碎片大小和结石清除情况。所有12组的初始结石质量(mg)、手术时间(秒)和激光能量消耗(kJ)相似。与传统技术(Ho:YAG+无吸引+无UAS)(65%,P<0.01)相比,sTFL+吸引+UAS的结石清除率最高(94%)。使用sTFL比Ho:YAG或Ho:YAG-的结石清除率更高。吸引改善了sTFL的结石清除率(P=0.01),但对Ho:YAG或Ho:YAG-无效,这与sTFL产生更小的碎片一致。在所有情况下,14F UAS的存在都改善了结石清除率(P<0.01)。在本研究中,在以下条件下结石清除率得到优化:sTFL、14F UAS和吸引。这种组合导致94%的结石碎片被清除;剩下的6%碎片均<2mm。在所有情况下,14F UAS的部署都改善了结石清除率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验