Suppr超能文献

一生中的创伤性脑损伤与晚年认知领域缺陷:PROTECT-TBI 队列研究。

Lifetime Traumatic Brain Injury and Cognitive Domain Deficits in Late Life: The PROTECT-TBI Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jul;40(13-14):1423-1435. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0360. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes cognitive impairment but it remains contested regarding which cognitive domains are most affected. Further, moderate-severe TBI is known to be deleterious, but studies of mild TBI (mTBI) show a greater mix of negative and positive findings. This study examines the longer-term cognitive effects of TBI severity and number of mTBIs in later life. We examined a subset ( = 15,764) of the PROTECT study, a cohort assessing risk factors for cognitive decline (ages between 50 and 90 years). Participants completed cognitive assessments annually for 4 years. Cognitive tests were grouped using a principal components analysis (PCA) into working memory, episodic memory, attention, processing speed, and executive function. Lifetime TBI severity and number were retrospectively recalled by participants using the Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire (BISQ). Linear mixed models (LMMs) examined the effect of severity of head injury (non-TBI head strike, mTBI, and moderate-severe TBI) and number of mTBI at baseline and over time. mTBI was considered as a continuous and categorical variable (groups: 0 mTBI, 1 mTBI, 2 mTBIs, 3 mTBIs, and 4+ mTBIs). Of the participants 5725 (36.3%) reported at least one mTBI and 510 (3.2%) at least one moderate-severe TBI, whereas 3711 (23.5%) had suffered at worst a non-TBI head strike and 5818 (32.9%) reported no head injuries. The participants had suffered their last reported head injury an average (standard deviation, SD) of 29.6 (20.0) years prior to the study. Regarding outcomes, there was no worsening in longitudinal cognitive trajectories over the study duration but at baseline there were significant cognitive deficits associated with TBI. At baseline, compared with those without head injury, individuals reporting at least one moderate-severe TBI had significantly poorer attention (B = -0.163, 0.001), executive scores (B = -0.151,  0.004), and processing speed (B = -0.075,  0.033). Those who had suffered at least a single mTBI also demonstrated significantly poorer attention scores at baseline compared with the no head injury group (B = -0.052,  0.001). Compared with those with no mTBI, those in the 3 mTBI group manifested poorer baseline executive function (B = -0.149,  0.025) and attention scores (B = -0.085,  0.015). At baseline, those who had suffered four or more mTBIs demonstrated poorer attention (B = -0.135,  < 0.001), processing speed (B = -0.072,  0.009), and working memory (B = -0.052,  0.036), compared with those reporting no mTBI. TBI is associated with fixed, dose, and severity-dependent cognitive deficits. The most sensitive cognitive domains are attention and executive function, with approximately double the effect compared with processing speed and working memory. Post-TBI cognitive rehabilitation should be targeted appropriately to domain-specific effects. Significant long-term cognitive deficits were associated with three or more lifetime mTBIs, a critical consideration when counseling individuals post-TBI about continuing high-risk activities.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)会导致认知障碍,但对于哪些认知领域受影响最大,仍存在争议。此外,中重度 TBI 已知是有害的,但轻度 TBI(mTBI)的研究显示出更多的负面和正面发现。本研究探讨了 TBI 严重程度和一生中 mTBI 数量对晚年认知的长期影响。我们检查了 PROTECT 研究的一个子集( = 15764),该队列评估了认知能力下降的风险因素(年龄在 50 至 90 岁之间)。参与者每年完成一次认知评估,为期 4 年。使用脑损伤筛查问卷(BISQ),参与者回顾了他们一生中发生的 TBI 严重程度和次数。线性混合模型(LMMs)检查了头部受伤严重程度(非 TBI 头部撞击、mTBI 和中重度 TBI)和基线和随时间变化的 mTBI 数量的影响。mTBI 被认为是一个连续的和分类的变量(组:0 mTBI、1 mTBI、2 mTBIs、3 mTBIs 和 4+ mTBIs)。在参与者中,5725 人(36.3%)报告至少有一次 mTBI,510 人(3.2%)至少有一次中重度 TBI,而 3711 人(23.5%)遭受过最严重的非 TBI 头部撞击,5818 人(32.9%)报告没有头部受伤。参与者在研究开始前平均(标准差,SD)遭受最后一次报告的头部损伤 29.6(20.0)年。关于结果,在研究期间,纵向认知轨迹没有恶化,但在基线时有与 TBI 相关的显著认知缺陷。在基线时,与没有头部受伤的个体相比,报告至少一次中重度 TBI 的个体在注意力(B = -0.163, 0.001)、执行分数(B = -0.151,  0.004)和处理速度(B = -0.075,  0.033)方面表现出显著较差。与没有头部受伤的组相比,那些至少遭受过一次 mTBI 的人在基线时也表现出明显较差的注意力评分(B = -0.052,  0.001)。与没有 mTBI 的人相比,3 mTBI 组的人在基线时表现出较差的执行功能(B = -0.149,  0.025)和注意力评分(B = -0.085,  0.015)。在基线时,与没有 mTBI 的人相比,遭受过四次或更多 mTBI 的人表现出较差的注意力(B = -0.135,  < 0.001)、处理速度(B = -0.072,  0.009)和工作记忆(B = -0.052,  0.036)。TBI 与固定、剂量和严重程度依赖的认知缺陷相关。最敏感的认知领域是注意力和执行功能,与处理速度和工作记忆相比,效果大约是其两倍。创伤后认知康复应该针对特定领域的影响进行适当的靶向治疗。与三次或更多次一生中 mTBI 相关的长期显著认知缺陷是在对 TBI 后个体进行继续高风险活动咨询时的一个重要考虑因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验