• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of pharmacological interventions on mortality and the average length of hospital stay of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物干预对 COVID-19 患者死亡率和平均住院时间的影响的比较效果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2022 Apr;20(4):585-609. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2022.1997587. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of delirium in critically ill adults.用于治疗重症成年患者谵妄的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9(9):CD011749. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011749.pub2.
4
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of depression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴发抑郁症的药物干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 19;12(12):CD012346. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012346.pub2.
5
Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on extubation times, length of stay and mortality rates in adult cardiac surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.右美托咪定与丙泊酚对成人心脏手术患者拔管时间、住院时间和死亡率的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 May;16(5):1220-1239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003488.
6
Prophylactic corticosteroids for paediatric heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.用于小儿体外循环心脏手术的预防性皮质类固醇
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 12;10(10):CD013101. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013101.pub2.
7
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.复杂创伤性事件后创伤后应激障碍及共患精神健康问题的心理和药理学干预措施:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Vitamin D supplementation for the treatment of COVID-19: a living systematic review.维生素 D 补充剂治疗 COVID-19:一项正在进行的系统评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;5(5):CD015043. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015043.
9
Corticosteroid therapy for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.COVID-19的皮质类固醇治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 21;100(20):e25719. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025719.
10
Efficacy and harms of tocilizumab for the treatment of COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.托珠单抗治疗 COVID-19 患者的疗效和危害:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269368. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of autoantibodies targeting interferon type 1 in COVID-19 severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.靶向1型干扰素自身抗体在新冠病毒疾病严重程度中的作用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Transl Autoimmun. 2023 Oct 14;7:100219. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2023.100219. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Tocilizumab versus anakinra in COVID-19: results from propensity score matching.托珠单抗与阿那白滞素治疗 COVID-19 的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析结果。
Front Immunol. 2023 May 26;14:1185716. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1185716. eCollection 2023.
3
Analyzing the Difference in the Length of Stay (LOS) in Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Patients Receiving Hydroxychloroquine or Favipiravir.分析接受羟氯喹或法匹拉韦治疗的中重度新冠肺炎患者的住院时长差异。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;15(12):1456. doi: 10.3390/ph15121456.
4
Efficacy of tocilizumab in the treatment of COVID-19: An umbrella review.托珠单抗治疗 COVID-19 的疗效:一项伞状评价。
Rev Med Virol. 2022 Nov;32(6):e2388. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2388. Epub 2022 Aug 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Canakinumab vs Placebo on Survival Without Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Patients Hospitalized With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.卡那奴单抗对比安慰剂对住院严重 COVID-19 患者免于有创机械通气的生存影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jul 20;326(3):230-239. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.9508.
2
Effect of Oral Azithromycin vs Placebo on COVID-19 Symptoms in Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.口服阿奇霉素对比安慰剂对 SARS-CoV-2 感染门诊患者 COVID-19 症状的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 10;326(6):490-498. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11517.
3
Clinical efficacy of low-dose emetine for patients with COVID-19: a real-world study.低剂量依米丁治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的临床疗效:一项真实世界研究
J BioX Res. 2021 Jun;4(2):53-59. doi: 10.1097/JBR.0000000000000076. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
4
Azithromycin versus standard care in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (ATOMIC2): an open-label, randomised trial.阿奇霉素对比标准治疗用于轻至中度 COVID-19 患者(ATOMIC2):一项开放标签、随机试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Oct;9(10):1130-1140. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00263-0. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
5
Lopinavir-ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine for critically ill patients with COVID-19: REMAP-CAP randomized controlled trial.洛匹那韦利托那韦和羟氯喹治疗 COVID-19 重症患者:REMAP-CAP 随机对照试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Aug;47(8):867-886. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06448-5. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
6
Convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in hospitalised patients: an open-label, randomised clinical trial.恢复期血浆治疗 COVID-19 住院患者:一项开放标签、随机临床试验。
Eur Respir J. 2022 Feb 10;59(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01471-2021. Print 2022 Feb.
7
Ivermectin to prevent hospitalizations in patients with COVID-19 (IVERCOR-COVID19) a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.伊维菌素预防 COVID-19 患者住院(IVERCOR-COVID19):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 2;21(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06348-5.
8
Telmisartan for treatment of Covid-19 patients: An open multicenter randomized clinical trial.替米沙坦治疗新冠肺炎患者:一项开放的多中心随机临床试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 18;37:100962. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100962. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
Ivermectin for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.伊维菌素治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 23;74(6):1022-1029. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab591.
10
Finasteride in hospitalized adult males with COVID-19: A risk factor for severity of the disease or an adjunct treatment: A randomized controlled clinical trial.非那雄胺用于住院的成年男性COVID-19患者:疾病严重程度的危险因素还是辅助治疗手段:一项随机对照临床试验
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Mar 3;35:30. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.30. eCollection 2021.

药物干预对 COVID-19 患者死亡率和平均住院时间的影响的比较效果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparative effectiveness of pharmacological interventions on mortality and the average length of hospital stay of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Student Research Committee, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2022 Apr;20(4):585-609. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2022.1997587. Epub 2021 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1080/14787210.2022.1997587
PMID:34694949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8787838/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Up to now, numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined various drugs as possible treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the results were diverse and occasionally even inconsistent with each other. To this point,we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the comparative effectiveness of pharmacological agents in published RCTs.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was performed using PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. RCTs evaluating mortality and the average length of hospital stay to standard of care (SOC)/placebo/control were included. RCTs mainly were classified into five categories of drugs, including anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antiparasitic, antibody and antibiotics. Meta-analysis was done on 5 drugs classes and sub-group meta-analysis was done on single drugs and moderate or severe stage of disease.

EXPERT OPINION

Mortality and the average length of hospital stay of COVID-19 patients were significantly reduced with anti-inflammatory drugs (odds ratio [OR]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69 to 0.85, P<0.00001, and mean difference [MD]: -1.41, CI:-1.75 to -1.07, P<0.00001, respectively) compared to SOC/control/placebo. Furthermore, antiparasitic was associated with reduced length of hospital stay (MD: -0.65, CI: -1.26 to -0.03, P<0.05) in comparison to SOC/placebo/control. However, no effectiveness was found in other pharmacological interventions.

摘要

简介

迄今为止,已有大量随机对照试验(RCT)研究了多种药物对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的潜在治疗作用,但结果各异,甚至相互矛盾。为此,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估已发表 RCT 中药物治疗的相对疗效。

涵盖领域

使用 PubMed、SCOPUS、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 数据库进行文献检索。纳入评估死亡率和平均住院时间与标准治疗(SOC)/安慰剂/对照的 RCT。RCT 主要分为五类药物,包括抗炎药、抗病毒药、抗寄生虫药、抗体和抗生素。对 5 类药物进行了荟萃分析,并对单药和中重度疾病进行了亚组荟萃分析。

专家意见

与 SOC/安慰剂/对照相比,抗炎药可显著降低 COVID-19 患者的死亡率和平均住院时间(比值比[OR]:0.77,95%置信区间[CI]:0.69 至 0.85,P<0.00001;均数差[MD]:-1.41,CI:-1.75 至 -1.07,P<0.00001)。此外,与 SOC/安慰剂/对照相比,抗寄生虫药可缩短住院时间(MD:-0.65,CI:-1.26 至 -0.03,P<0.05)。然而,其他药物干预措施均未见疗效。