Unidad de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Meta-análisis (URSIGET), Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola (USIL), Lima, Peru.
Hospital Guillermo Kaelin de La Fuente, Lima, Peru.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269368. eCollection 2022.
We systematically assessed benefits and harms of tocilizumab (TCZ), which is an antibody blocking IL-6 receptors, in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Five electronic databases and two preprint webpages were searched until March 4, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) cohorts assessing TCZ effects in hospitalized, COVID-19 adult patients were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, clinical worsening, clinical improvement, need for mechanical ventilation, and adverse events (AE). Inverse variance random-effects meta-analyses were performed with quality of evidence (QoE) evaluated using GRADE methodology.
Nine RCTs (n = 7,021) and nine IPTW cohorts (n = 7,796) were included. TCZ significantly reduced all-cause mortality in RCTs (RR 0.89, 95%CI 0.81-0.98, p = 0.03; moderate QoE) and non-significantly in cohorts (RR 0.67, 95%CI 0.44-1.02, p = 0.08; very low QoE) vs. control (standard of care [SOC] or placebo). TCZ significantly reduced the need for mechanical ventilation (RR 0.80, 95%CI 0.71-0.90, p = 0.001; moderate QoE) and length of stay (MD -1.92 days, 95%CI -3.46 to -0.38, p = 0.01; low QoE) vs. control in RCTs. There was no significant difference in clinical improvement or worsening between treatments. AEs, severe AEs, bleeding and thrombotic events were similar between arms in RCTs, but there was higher neutropenia risk with TCZ (very low QoE). Subgroup analyses by disease severity or risk of bias (RoB) were consistent with main analyses. Quality of evidence was moderate to very low in both RCTs and cohorts.
In comparison to SOC or placebo, TCZ reduced all-cause mortality in all studies and reduced mechanical ventilation and length of stay in RCTs in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Other clinical outcomes were not significantly impacted. TCZ did not have effect on AEs, except a significant increased neutropenia risk in RCTs. TCZ has a potential role in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
我们系统地评估了靶向白细胞介素 6 受体的单克隆抗体(托珠单抗,TCZ)在住院 COVID-19 患者中的获益和风险。
检索了五个电子数据库和两个预印本网页,截至 2021 年 3 月 4 日。纳入了评估 TCZ 对住院 COVID-19 成年患者疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)和逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)队列。主要结局为全因死亡率、临床恶化、临床改善、需要机械通气和不良事件(AE)。采用质量效应(GRADE)评估的Inverse variance 随机效应荟萃分析进行分析。
纳入了 9 项 RCT(n=7021)和 9 项 IPTW 队列(n=7796)。RCT 表明 TCZ 可显著降低全因死亡率(RR 0.89,95%CI 0.81-0.98,p=0.03;中质量证据),而队列研究则无显著差异(RR 0.67,95%CI 0.44-1.02,p=0.08;极低质量证据)。与对照组(标准治疗[SOC]或安慰剂)相比,TCZ 还可显著降低机械通气需求(RR 0.80,95%CI 0.71-0.90,p=0.001;中质量证据)和住院时间(MD-1.92 天,95%CI-3.46 至-0.38,p=0.01;低质量证据)。RCT 中,治疗组之间的临床改善或恶化无显著差异。RCT 中,TCZ 组与对照组的 AE、严重 AE、出血和血栓事件相似,但 TCZ 中性粒细胞减少风险更高(极低质量证据)。基于疾病严重程度或偏倚风险(RoB)的亚组分析结果与主要分析一致。RCT 和队列研究的证据质量均为中至极低。
与 SOC 或安慰剂相比,TCZ 可降低所有研究中 COVID-19 住院患者的全因死亡率,并降低 RCT 中 COVID-19 住院患者的机械通气和住院时间。其他临床结局未受到显著影响。除 RCT 中性粒细胞减少风险显著增加外,TCZ 对 AE 无影响。TCZ 可能对 COVID-19 住院患者有治疗作用。