• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮心脏起搏器导线拔除术穿孔的预测因素:加拿大经皮心脏起搏器导线拔除术风险(CLEAR)研究结果。

Predictors of perforation during lead extraction: Results of the Canadian Lead ExtrAction Risk (CLEAR) study.

机构信息

Divisions of Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Divisions of Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jul;19(7):1097-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.10.019. Epub 2021 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.10.019
PMID:34695576
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transvenous lead extraction can have serious adverse events, such as cardiac or vascular perforation. Risk factors have not been well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with perforation and death, and to characterize lead extraction in a large contemporary population.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicenter study examining patients undergoing lead extraction at 8 Canadian institutions from 1996 through 2016. Demographic and clinical data were used to identify variables associated with perforation and mortality using logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

A total of 2325 consecutive patients (age 61.9 ±16.5 years) underwent extraction of 4527 leads. Perforation rate was 2.7% (63/2325) and 30-day mortality was 1.6% (38/2325), with mortality of 0.4% due to perforation (10/2325). Variables associated with perforation included no previous cardiac surgery (odds ratio [OR] 3.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-7.19; P = .002), female sex (OR 3.27; 95% CI 1.91-5.60; P <.001); left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40% (OR 2.81; 95% CI 1.28-6.14; P = .010); lead age >8 years (OR 2.64; 95% CI 1.52-4.60; P <.001); ≥2 leads extracted (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.23-5.04; P = .011); and diabetes (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.16-3.86; P = .014). Variables associated with death included infection as indication for extraction (OR 3.85; 95% CI 1.38-10.73; P = .010); anemia (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.38-6.61; P = .003), and patient age (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.07; P = .012).

CONCLUSION

Risk factors associated with perforation in lead extraction include no history of cardiac surgery, female sex, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, lead age >8 years, ≥2 leads extracted, and diabetes.

摘要

背景

经静脉的导联拔除术可能会出现严重的不良事件,例如心脏或血管穿孔。危险因素尚未得到很好的描述。

目的

本研究的目的是确定与穿孔和死亡相关的因素,并对大量当代人群中的导联拔除术进行特征描述。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性多中心研究,该研究对 8 家加拿大机构 1996 年至 2016 年间进行的 2325 例连续患者进行了检查。使用逻辑回归模型,利用人口统计学和临床数据确定与穿孔和死亡率相关的变量。

结果

共有 2325 例连续患者(年龄 61.9±16.5 岁)接受了 4527 个导联的拔除术。穿孔率为 2.7%(63/2325),30 天死亡率为 1.6%(38/2325),死亡率为 0.4%(10/2325)归因于穿孔。与穿孔相关的变量包括无既往心脏手术史(比值比 [OR] 3.33;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.54-7.19;P=.002),女性(OR 3.27;95%CI 1.91-5.60;P <.001);左心室射血分数≥40%(OR 2.81;95%CI 1.28-6.14;P=.010);导联年龄>8 年(OR 2.64;95%CI 1.52-4.60;P <.001);≥2 个导联被拔除(OR 2.49;95%CI 1.23-5.04;P =.011);以及糖尿病(OR 2.12;95%CI 1.16-3.86;P =.014)。与死亡相关的变量包括感染作为拔除术的指征(OR 3.85;95%CI 1.38-10.73;P=.010);贫血(OR 3.14;95%CI 1.38-6.61;P=.003),和患者年龄(OR 1.04;95%CI 1.01-1.07;P=.012)。

结论

与导联拔除术穿孔相关的危险因素包括无心脏手术史、女性、保留的左心室射血分数、导联年龄>8 年、≥2 个导联被拔除、以及糖尿病。

相似文献

1
Predictors of perforation during lead extraction: Results of the Canadian Lead ExtrAction Risk (CLEAR) study.经皮心脏起搏器导线拔除术穿孔的预测因素:加拿大经皮心脏起搏器导线拔除术风险(CLEAR)研究结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jul;19(7):1097-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.10.019. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
2
Transvenous lead extraction in patients with systemic cardiac device-related infection-Procedural outcome and risk prediction: A GALLERY subgroup analysis.全身性心脏装置相关感染患者经静脉导线拔除术的程序性结果及风险预测:一项GALLERY亚组分析
Heart Rhythm. 2023 Feb;20(2):181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
3
Predictors of complications of endovascular chronic lead extractions from pacemakers and defibrillators: a single-operator experience.起搏器和除颤器血管内慢性导线拔除并发症的预测因素:单操作者经验
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Feb;20(2):171-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01283.x. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
4
Long-term survival following transvenous lead extraction: Importance of indication and comorbidities.经静脉导线拔除后的长期生存:适应证和合并症的重要性。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Sep;18(9):1566-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 10.
5
Transvenous revision of leads with cardiac perforation following device implantation-Safety, outcome, and complications.经静脉导线调整术治疗心脏穿孔——安全性、结果和并发症。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;43(11):1325-1332. doi: 10.1111/pace.14056. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
6
Cardiac tamponade as an inherent but potentially nonfatal complication of transvenous lead extraction: Experience with 1126 procedures performed using mechanical tools.心脏压塞作为经静脉导线拔除术的一种固有但潜在非致命的并发症:使用机械工具进行1126例手术的经验。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Dec;33(12):2625-2639. doi: 10.1111/jce.15668. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
7
Predictors of the right ventricular perforation caused by active-fixation pacing and defibrillator leads: A single-centre experience.主动固定起搏和除颤电极导致右心室穿孔的预测因素:单中心经验。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Mar;35(3):399-405. doi: 10.1111/jce.16181. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
8
Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic cardiac perforation caused by pacemaker and defibrillator leads.起搏器和除颤器导线致医源性心脏穿孔的诊断和处理。
Europace. 2017 Jun 1;19(6):1031-1037. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw074.
9
Incidence and Predictors of Perioperative Complications With Transvenous Lead Extractions: Real-World Experience With National Cardiovascular Data Registry.经静脉导线拔除术围手术期并发症的发生率及预测因素:国家心血管数据注册中心的真实世界经验。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Feb;11(2):e004768. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004768. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
10
Predictors and outcomes of patients requiring repeat transvenous lead extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads.需要重复经静脉拔除起搏器和除颤器导线的患者的预测因素及预后
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Feb;41(2):155-160. doi: 10.1111/pace.13266. Epub 2018 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and outcomes of inpatient cardiac implantable electronic device transvenous lead extractions: a nationwide analysis.住院患者心脏植入式电子设备经静脉导线拔除的趋势与结果:一项全国性分析。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01891-y.
2
LECOM (Lead Extraction COMplexity): A New Scoring System for Predicting a Difficult Procedure.LECOM(导线拔除复杂性):一种用于预测困难手术的新评分系统。
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 8;12(24):7568. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247568.
3
Transvenous lead extraction: Efficacy and safety of the procedure in female patients.
经静脉导线拔除术:该手术在女性患者中的疗效与安全性。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2023 Sep 12;4(10):625-631. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.09.002. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Outcomes of Transvenous Extraction of Leads Older Than 20 and 30 Years-A Large Cohort Study.经静脉取出 20 年以上和 30 年以上的导联的结果:一项大型队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 30;19(21):14184. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114184.
5
Occluded vein as a predictor for complications in non-infectious transvenous lead extraction.闭塞静脉作为非感染性经静脉导线拔除并发症的预测指标
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 4;9:1016657. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1016657. eCollection 2022.
6
Step by Step through the Years-High vs. Low Energy Lead Extraction Using Advanced Extraction Techniques.逐年逐步对比——使用先进提取技术的高能量与低能量导线提取
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 19;11(16):4884. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164884.
7
Development and validation of a risk score for predicting pericardial effusion in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker.开发和验证用于预测无导线起搏器植入患者发生心包积液风险的评分:使用 Micra 经导管起搏器的经验。
Europace. 2022 Jul 21;24(7):1119-1126. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab315.