Sung Meekang, Huang Yangmu, Duan Yuqi, Liu Fangjing, Jin Yinzi, Zheng Zhijie
College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, 1, Gwanak-ro 38-gil, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Beijing 100191, China.
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Oct 15;9(10):1183. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9101183.
(1) Objectives: Inequality in the global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines has brought about great challenges in terms of resolving the pandemic. Although vaccine manufacturers are undoubtedly some of the most influential players, studies on their role in global vaccine distribution have been scarce. This study examined whether the pharmaceutical industry is acting according to the principles of corporate social responsibility (CSR) during the pandemic. (2) Methods: Three categories were used to analyze the CSR of vaccine developers. The first was research and development: effectiveness, funding, and profits were measured. The second was transparency and accountability: the transparency of clinical trials and vaccine contracts was analyzed. The final was vaccine delivery: the status of the provision of vaccines to COVAX and lower-income countries, intellectual property management, manufacturing agreements, and equitable pricing were measured. (3) Results: Vaccine developers have acquired large profits. The vaccine delivery category faces the most challenges. Participation of pharmaceutical companies through COVAX was significantly low, and most vaccine supply agreements were secretive, bilateral deals. It was not clear if companies were maintaining equitable pricing. The evaluation indicated that the companies' CSR practices have differed during the pandemic. (4) Conclusions: Our study contributes to the methodology of assessing the CSR of vaccine developers. This would help understand the current COVID-19 vaccine distribution inequality and propose that pharmaceutical companies re-examine their roles and social responsibilities.
(1)目标:新冠疫苗全球分配的不平等给疫情防控带来了巨大挑战。尽管疫苗制造商无疑是最具影响力的参与者之一,但关于他们在全球疫苗分配中作用的研究却很少。本研究考察了制药行业在疫情期间是否按照企业社会责任(CSR)原则行事。(2)方法:采用三类指标分析疫苗开发商的企业社会责任。第一类是研发:衡量有效性、资金投入和利润。第二类是透明度和问责制:分析临床试验和疫苗合同的透明度。最后一类是疫苗交付:衡量向新冠疫苗全球获取机制(COVAX)和低收入国家提供疫苗的情况、知识产权管理、生产协议以及公平定价。(3)结果:疫苗开发商获得了巨额利润。疫苗交付类别面临的挑战最大。制药公司通过COVAX的参与度极低,而且大多数疫苗供应协议都是秘密的双边交易。尚不清楚公司是否维持公平定价。评估表明,疫情期间各公司的企业社会责任实践存在差异。(4)结论:我们的研究为评估疫苗开发商企业社会责任的方法做出了贡献。这将有助于理解当前新冠疫苗分配不平等的情况,并建议制药公司重新审视其角色和社会责任。