Suppr超能文献

确保公平获得疫苗的协议的伦理和实践考虑 述评:“更多痛苦,更多收获!新冠疫苗的交付和制药行业在扩大获取差距方面的作用”。

Ethical and Practical Considerations for an Agreement to Ensure Equitable Vaccine Access Comment on "More Pain, More Gain! The Delivery of COVID-19 Vaccines and the Pharmaceutical Industry's Role in Widening the Access Gap".

机构信息

Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8516. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8516. Epub 2024 May 18.

Abstract

This paper discusses the potential of an international agreement to ensure equitable vaccine distribution, addressing the failures witnessed during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVAX was unable to prevent vaccine monopolization and unequal distribution, which led to significant disparities in vaccination rates and avoidable deaths. Any future agreement on equitable vaccine distribution must address ethical and practical issues to ensure global health equity and access. The proposed agreement should recognize healthcare as a human right and consider vaccines beyond mere commodities, emphasizing the social responsibility of pharmaceutical companies to prioritize affordability, availability, and accessibility, particularly for low-income countries (LICs). Voluntary licensing agreements are suggested as a means to enhance access to essential medicines. The paper also outlines the necessity of international cooperation, with robust compliance mechanisms, to effectively enforce such an agreement and mitigate future health crises.

摘要

本文讨论了国际协议在确保公平疫苗分配方面的潜力,以应对 COVID-19 大流行期间出现的失败。COVAX 未能防止疫苗垄断和不平等分配,这导致疫苗接种率和可避免死亡人数存在显著差异。任何关于公平疫苗分配的未来协议都必须解决道德和实际问题,以确保全球健康公平和可及性。拟议的协议应承认医疗保健是一项人权,将疫苗视为超越商品的存在,强调制药公司的社会责任,优先考虑可负担性、可及性和可获得性,特别是对于低收入国家(LICs)。本文还提出了自愿许可协议作为增加获取基本药物的途径。本文还概述了国际合作的必要性,包括建立强有力的合规机制,以有效执行这样的协议并减轻未来的卫生危机。

相似文献

9
Vaccines for preventing infections in adults with haematological malignancies.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 21;5(5):CD015530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015530.pub2.
10
Inequities in the continuum of maternal care in Mexico: trends before and after COVID-19.
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 17;24(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02470-x.

引用本文的文献

1
From Aspiration to Action: Aligning the Pandemic Agreement with Equity in Vaccine Access; A Response to Recent Commentaries.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:9192. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.9192. Epub 2025 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
How Populism Affects Bioethics.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Mar 11:1-15. doi: 10.1017/S0963180124000161.
2
Increasing compliance with international pandemic law: international relations and new global health agreements.
Lancet. 2023 Sep 23;402(10407):1097-1106. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01527-1. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
4
Retrospectively modeling the effects of increased global vaccine sharing on the COVID-19 pandemic.
Nat Med. 2022 Nov;28(11):2416-2423. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02064-y. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
More Pain, More Gain! The Delivery of COVID-19 Vaccines and the Pharmaceutical Industry's Role in Widening the Access Gap.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):3101-3113. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6942. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
6
International treaties have mostly failed to produce their intended effects.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 9;119(32):e2122854119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2122854119. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
7
What are the obligations of pharmaceutical companies in a global health emergency?
Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):1015-1020. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01378-7. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
8
A patent waiver on COVID vaccines is right and fair.
Nature. 2021 May;593(7860):478. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-01242-1.
9
Covid-19: Countries are learning what others paid for vaccines.
BMJ. 2021 Jan 29;372:n281. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n281.
10
An ethical framework for global vaccine allocation.
Science. 2020 Sep 11;369(6509):1309-1312. doi: 10.1126/science.abe2803. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验