Suppr超能文献

探寻人类疾病中的统一概念。

In Search of a Unifying Concept in Human Diseases.

作者信息

Trosko James Edward

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics/Human Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

出版信息

Diseases. 2021 Oct 4;9(4):68. doi: 10.3390/diseases9040068.

Abstract

Throughout the history of biological/medicine sciences, there has been opposing strategies to find solutions to complex human disease problems. Both empirical and deductive approaches have led to major insights and concepts that have led to practical preventive and therapeutic benefits for the human population. The classic definitions of "science" (to know) has been paired with the classic definition of technology (to do). One knew more as the technology developed, and that development was often based on science. In other words, one could do more if science could improve the technology. In turn, this made possible to know more science with improved technology. However, with the development of new technologies of today in biology and medicine, major advances have been made, such as the information from the Human Genome Project, genetic engineering techniques and the use of bioinformatic uses of sophisticated computer analyses. This has led to the renewed idea that Precision Medicine, while raising some serious ethical concerns, also raises the expectation of improved potential of risk predictions for prevention and treatment of various genetically and environmentally influenced human diseases. This new field Artificial Intelligence, as a major handmaiden to Precision Medicine, is significantly altering the fundamental means of biological discovery. However, can today's fundamental premise of "Artificial Intelligence", based on identifying DNA, as the primary nexus of human health and disease, provide the practical solutions to complex human diseases that involve the interaction of those genes with the broad spectrum of "environmental factors"? Will it be "precise" enough to provide practical solutions for prevention and treatments of diseases? In this "Commentary", with the example of human carcinogenesis, it will be challenged that, without the integration of mechanistic and hypothesis-driven approaches with the "unbiased" empirical analyses of large numbers of data, the Artificial Intelligence approach with fall short.

摘要

在生物/医学科学的历史进程中,一直存在着针对复杂人类疾病问题寻找解决方案的对立策略。经验主义和演绎法都带来了重大的见解和概念,为人类带来了实际的预防和治疗益处。“科学”(去认知)的经典定义与“技术”(去实践)的经典定义相互关联。随着技术的发展,人们的认知不断增加,而这种发展往往基于科学。换句话说,如果科学能够改进技术,人们就能做得更多。反过来,这又使得借助改进的技术能够认知更多的科学。然而,随着当今生物和医学新技术的发展,取得了重大进展,例如人类基因组计划的信息、基因工程技术以及复杂计算机分析在生物信息学中的应用。这引发了一种新的观点,即精准医学虽然引发了一些严重的伦理问题,但也提高了对预防和治疗各种受遗传和环境影响的人类疾病进行风险预测的潜在可能性。作为精准医学的主要助力,人工智能这一新领域正在显著改变生物学发现的基本方式。然而,当今基于识别DNA作为人类健康与疾病主要关联的“人工智能”基本前提,能否为涉及这些基因与广泛“环境因素”相互作用的复杂人类疾病提供实际解决方案?它是否足够“精准”以提供疾病预防和治疗的实际解决方案?在这篇“评论”中,以人类致癌作用为例,将对以下观点提出质疑:如果不将机制性和假设驱动的方法与大量数据的“无偏”实证分析相结合,人工智能方法将会不足。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验