National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(6):371-379. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000734. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
Physical therapy following traumatic brain injury (TBI) can be negatively impacted by psychological symptoms, atypical symptom reporting, and response bias. We examined rates of Symptom Validity Test (SVT) failure in active duty military service members with a history of mild-moderate TBI and its impact on gait speed.
Intensive Outpatient Program at the National Intrepid Center of Excellence at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.
Participants were 84 active duty service members with a history of mild-moderate TBI classified as SVT pass ( n = 49) or SVT fail ( n = 35).
Retrospective study.
Overground preferred and fast walking speed as well as Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN) gait speed were recorded. Participants completed the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory and the Validity-10 was used to assign patients into the SVT pass and SVT fail groups. Gait speed metrics were compared across these groups and test operating characteristics were calculated.
Approximately 42% of the sample was classified into the SVT fail group. All 3 gait speed measures were significantly slower in the SVT fail group than in the SVT pass group ( P s < .001, d s = 0.60-0.80). Gait speed cutoffs for screeners or indicators of atypical reporting were identified.
The potential for response bias is a critical area for the clinician to consider when conducting physical therapy evaluations. Participants in the SVT fail group had slower walking speed on all 3 measures assessed. Several useful cutoffs were identified to serve as screeners or indicators of SVT failure, though these preliminary findings have limitations and need to be replicated.
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的物理治疗可能会受到心理症状、非典型症状报告和反应偏差的负面影响。我们研究了有轻度至中度 TBI 病史的现役军人中症状有效性测试(SVT)失败的发生率及其对步态速度的影响。
沃尔特里德国家军事医学中心国家坚韧卓越中心的强化门诊计划。
参与者为 84 名有轻度至中度 TBI 病史的现役军人,分为 SVT 通过(n=49)或 SVT 失败(n=35)。
回顾性研究。
记录地面首选和快速步行速度以及计算机辅助康复环境(CAREN)步态速度。参与者完成了神经行为症状量表,并用 Validity-10 来分配患者进入 SVT 通过和 SVT 失败组。比较了这些组的步态速度指标,并计算了测试操作特性。
大约 42%的样本被归入 SVT 失败组。SVT 失败组的所有 3 项步态速度指标均明显慢于 SVT 通过组(P 值均<.001,d 值为 0.60-0.80)。确定了筛查或非典型报告指标的步态速度临界值。
反应偏差的可能性是临床医生在进行物理治疗评估时需要考虑的一个关键领域。SVT 失败组的参与者在所有 3 项评估中步行速度都较慢。确定了几个有用的临界值作为 SVT 失败的筛查或指标,尽管这些初步发现存在局限性,需要进一步验证。