• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地面和虚拟现实步态速度与有轻度至中度创伤性脑损伤病史的现役军人的非典型症状报告相关。

Overground and Virtual Reality Gait Speed Are Associated With Atypical Symptom Reporting in Active Duty Service Members With a History of Mild to Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury.

机构信息

National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(6):371-379. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000734. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000734
PMID:34698684
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Physical therapy following traumatic brain injury (TBI) can be negatively impacted by psychological symptoms, atypical symptom reporting, and response bias. We examined rates of Symptom Validity Test (SVT) failure in active duty military service members with a history of mild-moderate TBI and its impact on gait speed.

SETTING

Intensive Outpatient Program at the National Intrepid Center of Excellence at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 84 active duty service members with a history of mild-moderate TBI classified as SVT pass ( n = 49) or SVT fail ( n = 35).

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

MAIN MEASURES

Overground preferred and fast walking speed as well as Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN) gait speed were recorded. Participants completed the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory and the Validity-10 was used to assign patients into the SVT pass and SVT fail groups. Gait speed metrics were compared across these groups and test operating characteristics were calculated.

RESULTS

Approximately 42% of the sample was classified into the SVT fail group. All 3 gait speed measures were significantly slower in the SVT fail group than in the SVT pass group ( P s < .001, d s = 0.60-0.80). Gait speed cutoffs for screeners or indicators of atypical reporting were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential for response bias is a critical area for the clinician to consider when conducting physical therapy evaluations. Participants in the SVT fail group had slower walking speed on all 3 measures assessed. Several useful cutoffs were identified to serve as screeners or indicators of SVT failure, though these preliminary findings have limitations and need to be replicated.

摘要

目的

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的物理治疗可能会受到心理症状、非典型症状报告和反应偏差的负面影响。我们研究了有轻度至中度 TBI 病史的现役军人中症状有效性测试(SVT)失败的发生率及其对步态速度的影响。

地点

沃尔特里德国家军事医学中心国家坚韧卓越中心的强化门诊计划。

参与者

参与者为 84 名有轻度至中度 TBI 病史的现役军人,分为 SVT 通过(n=49)或 SVT 失败(n=35)。

设计

回顾性研究。

主要措施

记录地面首选和快速步行速度以及计算机辅助康复环境(CAREN)步态速度。参与者完成了神经行为症状量表,并用 Validity-10 来分配患者进入 SVT 通过和 SVT 失败组。比较了这些组的步态速度指标,并计算了测试操作特性。

结果

大约 42%的样本被归入 SVT 失败组。SVT 失败组的所有 3 项步态速度指标均明显慢于 SVT 通过组(P 值均<.001,d 值为 0.60-0.80)。确定了筛查或非典型报告指标的步态速度临界值。

结论

反应偏差的可能性是临床医生在进行物理治疗评估时需要考虑的一个关键领域。SVT 失败组的参与者在所有 3 项评估中步行速度都较慢。确定了几个有用的临界值作为 SVT 失败的筛查或指标,尽管这些初步发现存在局限性,需要进一步验证。

相似文献

1
Overground and Virtual Reality Gait Speed Are Associated With Atypical Symptom Reporting in Active Duty Service Members With a History of Mild to Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury.地面和虚拟现实步态速度与有轻度至中度创伤性脑损伤病史的现役军人的非典型症状报告相关。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(6):371-379. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000734. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
2
Medical Evaluation Board Involvement, Non-Credible Cognitive Testing, and Emotional Response Bias in Concussed Service Members.医疗评估委员会的参与、不可信的认知测试以及脑震荡军人的情绪反应偏差
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e546-e554. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy038.
3
Examination of the Mild Brain Injury Atypical Symptom Scale and the Validity-10 Scale to detect symptom exaggeration in US military service members.对轻度脑损伤非典型症状量表和效度-10量表进行检测,以发现美国军人的症状夸大情况。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(3):325-37. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1013021. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
4
Clinical utility of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory validity scales to screen for symptom exaggeration following traumatic brain injury.神经行为症状量表效度量表在筛查创伤性脑损伤后症状夸大方面的临床效用。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(8):853-62. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1064864. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
5
Performance Validity, Neurocognitive Disorder, and Post-concussion Symptom Reporting in Service Members with a History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.有轻度创伤性脑损伤病史的军人的表现效度、神经认知障碍和脑震荡后症状报告
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Aug 1;33(5):606-618. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acx098.
6
Intensive Outpatient Program Response Among Service Members With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Change Between Distinct Post-Concussive Symptom Subgroups.军人轻度创伤性脑损伤患者强化门诊项目反应:不同后脑震荡症状亚组间的变化。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jun;104(6):892-901. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.12.191. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
7
Postconcussion Symptom Reporting After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Female Service Members: Impact of Gender, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Severity of Injury, and Associated Bodily Injuries.女性现役军人轻度创伤性脑损伤后的脑震荡后症状报告:性别、创伤后应激障碍、损伤严重程度及相关身体损伤的影响
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 Mar/Apr;33(2):101-112. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000353.
8
Examining the Relationship Between Conventional Outcomes and Immersive Balance Task Performance in Service Members With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.探讨在轻度创伤性脑损伤的军人中,常规结果与沉浸式平衡任务表现之间的关系。
Mil Med. 2021 May 3;186(5-6):577-586. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa578.
9
Observational study of associations between visual imagery and measures of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress among active-duty military service members with traumatic brain injury at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.观察性研究:在沃尔特·里德国家军事医学中心,现役有创伤性脑损伤的军事人员中,视觉意象与抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激相关测量指标之间的关联。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 11;8(6):e021448. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021448.
10
Symptom Reporting Patterns of US Military Service Members with a History of Concussion According to Duty Status.根据服役状态,有脑震荡病史的美国军人的症状报告模式
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Mar 1;34(2):236-242. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy031.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovative Technologies in the Neurorehabilitation of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.创伤性脑损伤神经康复中的创新技术:一项系统综述
Brain Sci. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):1678. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121678.