Blue House Veterinary LLC, Buffalo Lake, MN 55314.
Secure Food Systems Team, Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108,
Avian Dis. 2021 Sep;65(3):474-482. doi: 10.1637/aviandiseases-D-21-00019.
The 2015 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N2 outbreak affected more than 200 Midwestern U.S. poultry premises. Although each affected poultry operation incurred substantial losses, some operations of the same production type and of similar scale had differences between one another in their ability to recognize evidence of the disease before formal diagnoses and in their ability to make proactive, farm-level disease containment decisions. In this case comparison study, we examine the effect of HPAI infection on two large egg production facilities and the epidemiologic and financial implications resulting from differences in detection and decision-making processes. Each egg laying facility had more than 1 million caged birds distributed among 18 barns on one premises (Farm A) and 17 barns on the other premises (Farm B). We examine how farm workers' awareness of disease signs, as well as how management's immediate or delayed decisions to engage in depopulation procedures, affected flock mortality, levels of environmental contamination, time intervals for re population, and farm profits on each farm. By predictive mathematical modeling, we estimated the time of virus introduction to examine how quickly infection was identified on the farms and then estimated associated contact rates within barns. We found that the farm that implemented depopulation immediately after detection of abnormal mortality (Farm A) was able to begin repopulation of barns 37 days sooner than the farm that began depopulation well after the detection of abnormally elevated mortality (Farm B). From average industry economic data, we determined that the loss associated with delayed detection using lost profit per day in relation to down time was an additional $3.3 million for Farm B when compared with Farm A.
2015 年高致病性禽流感(HPAI)H5N2 疫情影响了美国中西部 200 多个家禽养殖场。尽管每个受影响的家禽养殖场都遭受了巨大的损失,但同一生产类型和规模相似的一些养殖场在识别疾病迹象的能力、在做出积极主动的农场层面疾病控制决策的能力方面存在差异。在这项病例对照研究中,我们研究了 HPAI 感染对两个大型蛋鸡生产设施的影响,以及检测和决策过程的差异对流行病学和财务的影响。每个蛋鸡养殖场有超过 100 万只笼养鸟类分布在一个养殖场(A 场)的 18 个畜舍和另一个养殖场(B 场)的 17 个畜舍中。我们研究了农场工人对疾病迹象的认识,以及管理层立即或延迟决定进行扑杀程序如何影响禽类死亡率、环境污染物水平、重新养殖的时间间隔以及每个养殖场的农场利润。通过预测数学模型,我们估计了病毒传入的时间,以检查农场内感染的识别速度,然后估计了畜舍内的相关接触率。我们发现,在检测到异常死亡率后立即实施扑杀的农场(A 场)比在异常高死亡率检测后才开始扑杀的农场(B 场)早 37 天开始重新养殖畜舍。根据平均行业经济数据,我们确定,与停机时间相关的每天损失利润相关的延迟检测的损失对于 B 场而言比 A 场多 330 万美元。