McDaniel Mark A, Marsh Elizabeth J, Gouravajhala Reshma
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;17(2):385-406. doi: 10.1177/17456916211000716. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
In this article, we highlight an underappreciated individual difference: structure building. Structure building is integral to many everyday activities and involves creating coherent mental representations of conversations, texts, pictorial stories, and other events. People vary in this ability in a way not generally captured by other better known concepts and individual difference measures. Individuals with lower structure-building ability consistently perform worse on a range of comprehension and learning measures than do individuals with higher structure-building ability, both in the laboratory and in the classroom. Problems include a range of comprehension processes, including encoding factual content, inhibiting irrelevant information, and constructing a cohesive situation model of a text or conversation. Despite these problems, recent research is encouraging in that techniques to improve the learning outcomes for low-ability structure builders have been identified. We argue that the accumulated research warrants the recognition of structure building as an important individual difference in cognitive functioning and that additional theoretical work is needed to understand the underpinnings of structure-building deficits.
在本文中,我们强调一种未得到充分重视的个体差异:构建结构。构建结构是许多日常活动不可或缺的一部分,涉及为对话、文本、图片故事及其他事件创建连贯的心理表征。人们在这种能力上存在差异,而这种差异通常未被其他更知名的概念和个体差异测量方法所涵盖。在实验室和课堂环境中,结构构建能力较低的个体在一系列理解和学习测量方面的表现始终不如结构构建能力较高的个体。问题包括一系列理解过程,如对事实内容进行编码、抑制无关信息,以及构建文本或对话的连贯情境模型。尽管存在这些问题,但近期的研究令人鼓舞,因为已确定了一些技术来改善结构构建能力较低者的学习成果。我们认为,积累的研究成果足以使构建结构被认可为认知功能中一种重要的个体差异,并且需要更多的理论工作来理解结构构建缺陷的内在机制。