Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY.
New York Medical College, School of Medicine.
Surg Technol Int. 2021 Oct 26;39:197-203. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.39.HR1510.
Robotic inguinal hernia repair has become more common and has replaced the laparoscopic approach in many hospitals in the US. We present a retrospective review of 416 consecutive inguinal hernia repairs using the robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach in an academic community hospital.
This is a retrospective review of 416 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repairs in 292 patients performed from October 2015 to March 2021 by two surgeons. The demographics, intra-operative findings, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The results for patients during the initial 25 cases (which were considered to be during the learning curve for each surgeon) were compared to their subsequent cases. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors for postoperative complications.
Overall, 292 patients underwent 416 inguinal hernia repairs, of whom 124 (42.5%) had bilateral hernias. The mean age was 61 years and the mean BMI was 26.96 kg/m2. Of the bilateral hernias, 31.5% were unsuspected pre-operatively. Femoral hernias were found in 20.5% of patients, including in 18.4% of men, which were also unsuspected. Post-operatively, 89% of patients were discharged home the same day. The most common post-operative complication was seroma, which occurred in 13%. Three patients required re-intervention: one had deep SSI (infected mesh removal), one had a needle aspiration of a hematoma (SSORI), and one was operated on for small bowel volvulus related to adhesions. On short-term follow-up, there was only one early recurrence (0.2%). When cases during the learning curve period were compared to subsequent surgeries, there were no major differences in post-operative complications or operating time. Patients aged ≥55 years had a 2.456-fold (p=0.023) increased odds of post-operative complications.
Robotic inguinal hernia repair can be safely performed at a community hospital with few early post-operative complications and very low early recurrence rates. The robotic approach also allows for the detection of a significant number of unsuspected contralateral inguinal hernias and femoral hernias, especially in male patients. Age ≥55 years was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications.
机器人腹股沟疝修补术在美国的许多医院已经变得更加普遍,并取代了腹腔镜方法。我们报告了在一家学术社区医院使用机器人经腹腹膜前入路对 416 例连续腹股沟疝修补术的回顾性研究。
这是对 2015 年 10 月至 2021 年 3 月期间由两位外科医生进行的 292 例连续机器人腹股沟疝修补术的回顾性研究。分析了患者的人口统计学、术中发现和术后结果。将前 25 例患者(被认为是每位外科医生学习曲线期间的病例)的结果与随后的病例进行比较。使用多变量逻辑回归分析确定术后并发症的独立危险因素。
总体而言,292 例患者接受了 416 例腹股沟疝修补术,其中 124 例(42.5%)为双侧疝。平均年龄为 61 岁,平均 BMI 为 26.96kg/m2。双侧疝中,31.5%术前未被发现。股疝在 20.5%的患者中发现,其中 18.4%为男性,这些股疝也未被发现。术后 89%的患者当天出院。最常见的术后并发症是血清肿,发生率为 13%。有 3 例患者需要再次干预:1 例深部 SSI(感染性网片切除),1 例血肿针吸术(SSORI),1 例因粘连相关小肠扭转而手术。短期随访时,仅发现 1 例早期复发(0.2%)。当比较学习曲线期间的病例与随后的手术时,术后并发症或手术时间没有明显差异。年龄≥55 岁的患者术后并发症的几率增加 2.456 倍(p=0.023)。
机器人腹股沟疝修补术可以在社区医院安全进行,术后早期并发症少,早期复发率低。机器人方法还可以发现大量未被发现的对侧腹股沟疝和股疝,尤其是在男性患者中。年龄≥55 岁是术后并发症的独立危险因素。