• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

70岁及以上和70岁以下患者经腹腹膜前入路机器人腹股沟疝修补术的临床结果:一项单机构回顾性队列研究,并代表机器人全球外科学会(TROGSS)进行全面系统综述。

Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society.

作者信息

Rivero-Moreno Yeisson, Goyal Aman, Redden-Chirinos Samantha, Bulut Halil, Dominguez-Profeta Rebeca, Munnangi Pujita, Shenoi Jason, Ganguly Paulamy, Blanc Pierre, Alkadam Khalid, Pouwels Sjaak, Taha Safwan, Pascotto Beniamino, Azagra Juan Santiago, Yang Wah, Garcia Andrea, Morfin-Meza Kathia Dayana, Fuentes-Orozco Clotilde, González-Ojeda Alejandro, Suárez-Carreón Luis Osvaldo, Marano Luigi, Abou-Mrad Adel, Oviedo Rodolfo J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, USA.

Universidad de Oriente, Núcleo Anzoátegui, Venezuela.

出版信息

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 Dec 24;37(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9.

DOI:10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9
PMID:39718673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11668831/
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to assess and compare outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) in patients under and over 70 years old, performed by a fellowship-trained robotic surgeon at a single institution.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing robotic primary transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair between 2020 and 2022 was conducted. Patients were categorized into two age groups: those under 70 years and 70 years and older. Data were collected through chart reviews with a mean follow-up of 30 days. Concurrently, a systematic review (SR) of relevant high-level literature was carried out.

RESULTS

Among the 37 patients studied, 75.7% (n = 28) were male, with a mean age of 64.8 years. Demographic features did not significantly differ based on age groups. Patients > 70 years had a higher incidence of reported complications (52.3% vs. 87.5%, p < 0.461). There were no differences in operative time or length of stay between the groups. In the SR, only 23.7% (n = 9) of studies provided age-related conclusions. Three studies identified age over 70 as a risk factor for postoperative complications, while two studies suggested that RIHR is feasible and safe in patients aged 80 years and older.

CONCLUSION

Patients over 70 years old demonstrated a higher incidence of complications compared to younger patients. However, current literature indicates that the robotic approach may offer a safe and minimally invasive option for inguinal hernia repair in both younger and older adults.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较由一名在单一机构接受过专项培训的机器人外科医生为70岁及以下和70岁以上患者实施的机器人腹股沟疝修补术(RIHR)的效果。

方法

对2020年至2022年间接受机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的患者进行回顾性分析。患者被分为两个年龄组:70岁以下和70岁及以上。通过病历审查收集数据,平均随访30天。同时,对相关高水平文献进行系统评价(SR)。

结果

在研究的37例患者中,75.7%(n = 28)为男性,平均年龄64.8岁。不同年龄组的人口统计学特征无显著差异。70岁以上患者报告的并发症发生率更高(52.3%对87.5%,p < 0.461)。两组之间的手术时间和住院时间无差异。在系统评价中,只有23.7%(n = 9)的研究提供了与年龄相关的结论。三项研究确定70岁以上为术后并发症的危险因素,而两项研究表明RIHR在80岁及以上患者中是可行且安全的。

结论

与年轻患者相比,70岁以上患者的并发症发生率更高。然而,目前的文献表明,机器人手术方法可能为年轻和老年成人腹股沟疝修补提供一种安全且微创的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7939/11668831/896bbc7d6fe7/40520_2024_2890_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7939/11668831/896bbc7d6fe7/40520_2024_2890_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7939/11668831/896bbc7d6fe7/40520_2024_2890_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society.70岁及以上和70岁以下患者经腹腹膜前入路机器人腹股沟疝修补术的临床结果:一项单机构回顾性队列研究,并代表机器人全球外科学会(TROGSS)进行全面系统综述。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 Dec 24;37(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9.
2
Inflammatory response and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: randomized clinical trial (ROLAIS).腹腔镜与机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后的炎症反应及短期结局:随机临床试验(ROLAIS)
Br J Surg. 2025 Mar 28;112(4). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf074.
3
Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人腹股沟与经腹腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:RIVAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):380-387. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034.
4
Transition from Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair to Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Review of a Single Surgeon's Experience.从腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术过渡到机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术:单中心回顾性研究
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2251-2257. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3998-3.
5
Open vs. robot-assisted preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Are they truly clinically different?开放式与机器人辅助腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术。它们在临床上真的有区别吗?
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1355-1363. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03050-8. Epub 2024 May 4.
6
Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair.机器人腹股沟疝修补术
Am Surg. 2017 Dec 1;83(12):1418-1421.
7
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):239-44. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
8
Feasibility of robotic-assisted minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair in patients with urologic considerations including artificial urinary sphincters and bladder herniation.对于存在包括人工尿道括约肌和膀胱疝等泌尿外科相关情况的患者,机器人辅助微创腹股沟疝修补术的可行性。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):695-699. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01163-7. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
9
Does robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) hernia repair facilitate contralateral investigation and repair without compromising patient morbidity?机器人辅助经腹腹膜前(R-TAPP)疝修补术能否在不增加患者发病率的情况下便于对侧检查和修补?
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):713-718. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0815-4. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
Robotic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with the Dexter robotic system™: A prospective multicenter clinical investigation.使用德克斯特机器人系统™进行机器人微创腹股沟疝修补术:一项前瞻性多中心临床研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7647-7655. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11361-1. Epub 2024 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting mortality and re-hospitalization for heart failure: a machine-learning and cluster analysis on frailty and comorbidity.预测心力衰竭的死亡率和再住院率:基于脆弱性和合并症的机器学习和聚类分析。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Dec;35(12):2919-2928. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02566-w. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
2
Early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective single-institution study in Korea.机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的早期疗效:韩国一项单机构回顾性研究
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Sep 15;26(3):128-133. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.128.
3
Association of preoperative frailty with pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery in elderly individuals: a prospective cohort study.
术前衰弱与老年人心血管手术后肺部并发症的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Nov;35(11):2453-2462. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02527-3. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
4
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Does age matter?早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:年龄重要吗?
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2023 Sep;23(9):671-675. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14643. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
5
Risk factors analysis and nomogram construction for postoperative pulmonary infection in elderly patients with hip fractures.老年髋部骨折患者术后肺部感染的危险因素分析及列线图构建。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Sep;35(9):1891-1899. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02480-1. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis.一个用于生成符合PRISMA 2020标准流程图的R包和Shiny应用程序,具有交互性以实现优化的数字透明度和开放综合。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 27;18(2):e1230. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1230. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
One-year experience of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach in a single institute: 2 different surgeons with different levels of experience.单一机构中机器人经腹腹膜前入路的一年经验:两位经验水平不同的外科医生。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Mar;104(3):176-181. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.3.176. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis.机器人与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)双侧疝修补术:使用倾向评分匹配分析的多中心回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1188-1193. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09614-y. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
9
Socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of primary robotic hernia repair.初级机器人疝修补术利用中的社会经济差异。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4829-4833. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09627-7. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
10
Sex disparities in the treatment and outcomes of ventral and incisional hernia repair.腹侧疝和切口疝修补治疗及预后中的性别差异
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3061-3068. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09475-5. Epub 2022 Aug 3.