Suppr超能文献

内科继续医学教育与同行评审(CEPRIME)

Continuing education and peer review in internal medicine (CEPRIME).

作者信息

Legge D G, Richmond D E

出版信息

Aust N Z J Med. 1986 Oct;16(5):679-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1986.tb00012.x.

Abstract

Research in adult education shows that educational initiatives are most effective when they are related to perceived needs. The CEPRIME system was devised as a means of using peer review to reveal the educational needs of physicians. Sixteen physicians volunteered to test the system, by allowing a panel of specialists to review copies of their reports to referring general practitioners. The comments of the reviewers, both commendatory and critical, were referred back to the participants, and their evaluation of the system was sought. Although the method was found to have limitations relating both to the adequacy of the report as a document for review, and to the objectivity and relevance of the comments made about it, the results were such as to encourage further development of CEPRIME as a means of appraising physicians of their specific educational needs.

摘要

成人教育研究表明,教育举措在与感知到的需求相关时最为有效。CEPRIME系统的设计目的是利用同行评审来揭示医生的教育需求。16名医生自愿参与测试该系统,他们允许一个专家小组审查他们给转诊全科医生的报告副本。评审人员的赞扬性和批判性意见反馈给了参与者,并征求了他们对该系统的评价。尽管发现该方法存在一些局限性,既涉及报告作为评审文件的充分性,也涉及对其评论的客观性和相关性,但结果足以鼓励进一步开发CEPRIME系统,作为评估医生特定教育需求的一种手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验