Legge D G, Richmond D E
Aust Clin Rev. 1986 Dec;6(23):183-9.
This was a pilot project intended to evaluate the practicalities of a new method of linking Peer Review with Continuing Medical Education for consultant physicians (internists). Peer Review of the physicians' reports to the referring general practitioners on each consultation. Sixteen physicians were enrolled for varying periods of time. They submitted from 12 to 454 cases for review (mean 94 cases) overall. One half of the cases attracted comment from the reviewers. The main themes of critical comments have been identified. Appropriate study courses based on the results of the review were developed for some of the participants. The latter were in general agreement that the CEPRIME system has potential to achieve its purpose; but it is obvious that certain modifications would improve the flow of material and the value of the exercise to the physicians.
这是一个试点项目，旨在评估一种将同行评议与顾问医师（内科医师）继续医学教育相联系的新方法的实用性。对医师给每位会诊的转诊全科医生的报告进行同行评议。16名医师参与了不同时间段的项目。他们总共提交了12至454例病例以供审查（平均94例）。其中一半的病例得到了评审人员的评论。已确定了批判性评论的主要主题。根据评审结果为一些参与者制定了适当的学习课程。后者普遍认为CEPRIME系统有潜力实现其目标；但显然某些修改将改善材料的流通以及该活动对医师的价值。
