Suppr超能文献

德国、英国和美国产品特性摘要/处方信息中禁忌内容的可理解性——一项定性与定量对比分析

Comprehensibility of Contraindications in German, UK and US Summaries of Product Characteristics/Prescribing Information-A Comparative Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.

作者信息

Then Melanie I, Andrikyan Wahram, Fromm Martin F, Maas Renke

机构信息

Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Fahrstr. 17, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 18;11(14):4167. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144167.

Abstract

Contraindications (CIs) in Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs)/Prescribing Information (PI) that lack clarity may pose a risk to medication safety and increase the risk for adverse drug reactions. We assessed and compared SmPCs/PI from three major drug markets regarding comprehensibility from the prescriber perspective, as well as usability in clinical decision support systems. 158 drugs met the following inclusion criteria: marketed in Germany (DE), United Kingdom (UK) and United States (US) and belonged to the 100 most recently FDA approved and/or 100 most frequently prescribed drugs in either country. In the 474 (3 × 158) SmPCs/PI all expressions for absolute CIs were identified, divided into 3999 stand-alone terms and evaluated according to 'clarity' and 'codability'. The average number of absolute CIs per drug differed drastically between the three markets (DE: 11.7, UK: 9.0, US: 4.6). Expressions were frequently unclear (DE: 27.2% (95% CI 25.2-29.2%), UK: 28.5% (26.2-30.9%), US: 22.6% (19.7-25.8%)). Moreover, 60.9% (58.6-63.1%), 63.6% (61.0-66.0%), and 64.7% (61.2-68.1%) of the expressions were not codable in DE, UK, and US, respectively. Taken together, in three major drug markets, statements regarding CIs in SmPCs/PI substantially differ in frequency and frequently lack clarity and codability which poses an unnecessary obstacle to medication safety.

摘要

药品特性摘要(SmPCs)/处方信息(PI)中不明确的禁忌(CIs)可能对用药安全构成风险,并增加药物不良反应的风险。我们从开处方者的角度评估并比较了来自三个主要药品市场的SmPCs/PI的可理解性,以及在临床决策支持系统中的可用性。158种药物符合以下纳入标准:在德国(DE)、英国(UK)和美国(US)上市,且属于两国中最近100种FDA批准的和/或100种最常用的药物。在474份(3×158)SmPCs/PI中,识别出所有绝对禁忌的表述,分为3999个独立术语,并根据“清晰度”和“可编码性”进行评估。三种市场中每种药物的绝对禁忌平均数量差异很大(德国:11.7,英国:9.0,美国:4.6)。表述常常不明确(德国:27.2%(95%CI 25.2 - 29.2%),英国:28.5%(26.2 - 30.9%),美国:22.6%(19.7 - 25.8%))。此外,在德国、英国和美国,分别有60.9%(58.6 - 63.1%)、63.6%(61.0 - 66.0%)和64.7%(61.2 - 68.1%)的表述不可编码。总体而言,在三个主要药品市场中,SmPCs/PI中关于禁忌的表述在频率上有很大差异,并且常常缺乏清晰度和可编码性,这对用药安全构成了不必要的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f51b/9316253/d81fde58c3ce/jcm-11-04167-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验