Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Cancer Med. 2021 Dec;10(23):8300-8309. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4025. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
The optimal definitive chemotherapy regimen during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear because of conflicting evidence. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of taxane-based chemotherapy with that of conventional cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) as the chemotherapy regimen in definitive CRT for ESCC.
This retrospective study included patients with ESCC who received paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) or PF during definitive CRT between May 2012 and February 2015 in a medical center in Taiwan. Survival outcomes were compared after adjustment for risk factors.
Overall, 229 patients were evaluated. Patients in the PC group had an objective response rate of 71.1% compared with the 51.4% of the PF group (p = 0.016). The PC group showed a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.019) than the PF group. Salvage surgery also helped prolong both the PFS and OS (p < 0001). Sex (male vs. female, HR, 1.831; 95% CI, 1.016-3.303), clinical stage (HR, 1.282; 95% CI, 1.069-1.537), accumulative radiation dose (≥41.4 Gy vs. <41.4 Gy; HR, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.413-0.993), salvage surgery (yes vs. no, HR: 0.412, 95% CI: 0.298-0.570), and regimen (PF vs. PC; HR, 1.514; 95% CI, 1.109-2.067) were independent prognostic factors for cancer mortality.
Compared with the PF regimen, the PC regimen for definitive CRT yielded significantly increased response rates and longer survival times; therefore, the PC regimen may be preferable for chemotherapy for definitive CRT in patients with advanced ESCC.
在同步放化疗(CRT)期间,对于晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者,最佳的确定性化疗方案仍不明确,因为存在相互矛盾的证据。本研究旨在比较以紫杉烷为基础的化疗与常规顺铂加 5-氟尿嘧啶(PF)作为 ESCC 确定性 CRT 化疗方案的疗效。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2012 年 5 月至 2015 年 2 月期间在台湾一家医疗中心接受紫杉醇加卡铂(PC)或 PF 进行确定性 CRT 的 ESCC 患者。在调整了风险因素后,对生存结果进行了比较。
共有 229 名患者接受了评估。PC 组的客观缓解率为 71.1%,而 PF 组为 51.4%(p=0.016)。PC 组的无进展生存期(PFS,p=0.002)和总生存期(OS,p=0.019)明显长于 PF 组。挽救性手术也有助于延长 PFS 和 OS(p<0.0001)。性别(男性与女性,HR,1.831;95%CI,1.016-3.303)、临床分期(HR,1.282;95%CI,1.069-1.537)、累积辐射剂量(≥41.4Gy 与<41.4Gy;HR,0.640;95%CI,0.413-0.993)、挽救性手术(是与否,HR:0.412,95%CI:0.298-0.570)和方案(PF 与 PC;HR,1.514;95%CI,1.109-2.067)是癌症死亡的独立预后因素。
与 PF 方案相比,PC 方案用于确定性 CRT 可显著提高缓解率和延长生存时间;因此,PC 方案可能更适合晚期 ESCC 患者的确定性 CRT 化疗。