• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用回顾性真实世界证据,紫杉醇联合卡铂确定性同期放化疗优于顺铂联合 5-氟尿嘧啶治疗不可切除食管鳞癌患者。

Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin is superior to cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using retrospective, real-world evidence.

机构信息

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2021 Dec;10(23):8300-8309. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4025. Epub 2021 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.4025
PMID:34706159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8633257/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal definitive chemotherapy regimen during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear because of conflicting evidence. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of taxane-based chemotherapy with that of conventional cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) as the chemotherapy regimen in definitive CRT for ESCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with ESCC who received paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) or PF during definitive CRT between May 2012 and February 2015 in a medical center in Taiwan. Survival outcomes were compared after adjustment for risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 229 patients were evaluated. Patients in the PC group had an objective response rate of 71.1% compared with the 51.4% of the PF group (p = 0.016). The PC group showed a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.019) than the PF group. Salvage surgery also helped prolong both the PFS and OS (p < 0001). Sex (male vs. female, HR, 1.831; 95% CI, 1.016-3.303), clinical stage (HR, 1.282; 95% CI, 1.069-1.537), accumulative radiation dose (≥41.4 Gy vs. <41.4 Gy; HR, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.413-0.993), salvage surgery (yes vs. no, HR: 0.412, 95% CI: 0.298-0.570), and regimen (PF vs. PC; HR, 1.514; 95% CI, 1.109-2.067) were independent prognostic factors for cancer mortality.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the PF regimen, the PC regimen for definitive CRT yielded significantly increased response rates and longer survival times; therefore, the PC regimen may be preferable for chemotherapy for definitive CRT in patients with advanced ESCC.

摘要

背景

在同步放化疗(CRT)期间,对于晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者,最佳的确定性化疗方案仍不明确,因为存在相互矛盾的证据。本研究旨在比较以紫杉烷为基础的化疗与常规顺铂加 5-氟尿嘧啶(PF)作为 ESCC 确定性 CRT 化疗方案的疗效。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2012 年 5 月至 2015 年 2 月期间在台湾一家医疗中心接受紫杉醇加卡铂(PC)或 PF 进行确定性 CRT 的 ESCC 患者。在调整了风险因素后,对生存结果进行了比较。

结果

共有 229 名患者接受了评估。PC 组的客观缓解率为 71.1%,而 PF 组为 51.4%(p=0.016)。PC 组的无进展生存期(PFS,p=0.002)和总生存期(OS,p=0.019)明显长于 PF 组。挽救性手术也有助于延长 PFS 和 OS(p<0.0001)。性别(男性与女性,HR,1.831;95%CI,1.016-3.303)、临床分期(HR,1.282;95%CI,1.069-1.537)、累积辐射剂量(≥41.4Gy 与<41.4Gy;HR,0.640;95%CI,0.413-0.993)、挽救性手术(是与否,HR:0.412,95%CI:0.298-0.570)和方案(PF 与 PC;HR,1.514;95%CI,1.109-2.067)是癌症死亡的独立预后因素。

结论

与 PF 方案相比,PC 方案用于确定性 CRT 可显著提高缓解率和延长生存时间;因此,PC 方案可能更适合晚期 ESCC 患者的确定性 CRT 化疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526e/8633257/62dbe92f366c/CAM4-10-8300-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526e/8633257/7b1d85acd973/CAM4-10-8300-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526e/8633257/62dbe92f366c/CAM4-10-8300-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526e/8633257/7b1d85acd973/CAM4-10-8300-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526e/8633257/62dbe92f366c/CAM4-10-8300-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin is superior to cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using retrospective, real-world evidence.使用回顾性真实世界证据,紫杉醇联合卡铂确定性同期放化疗优于顺铂联合 5-氟尿嘧啶治疗不可切除食管鳞癌患者。
Cancer Med. 2021 Dec;10(23):8300-8309. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4025. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
2
Comparison of 3 Paclitaxel-Based Chemoradiotherapy Regimens for Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.三种紫杉醇为基础的放化疗方案治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌患者的比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220120. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0120.
3
Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: long-term follow-up results of a phase II randomized controlled trial.多西他赛联合顺铂与氟尿嘧啶联合顺铂同步放化疗治疗食管鳞癌的前瞻性随机对照Ⅱ期临床试验长期随访结果
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Sep 12;18(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02339-9.
4
Comparison of cisplatinum/paclitaxel with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for nonsurgical locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.顺铂/紫杉醇与顺铂/5-氟尿嘧啶作为非手术局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者一线治疗方案的比较。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Jul 1;10:2129-36. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S105441. eCollection 2016.
5
A randomized phase 3 trial comparing paclitaxel plus 5-fluorouracil versus cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil in Chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma-the ESO-shanghai 1 trial protocol.一项比较紫杉醇联合氟尿嘧啶与顺铂联合氟尿嘧啶在局部晚期食管癌放化疗中的随机 3 期临床试验——ESO-shanghai 1 试验方案。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Feb 27;13(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0979-0.
6
TENERGY: multicenter phase II study of Atezolizumab monotherapy following definitive Chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU plus Cisplatin in patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.TENERGY:特瑞普利单抗单药治疗联合 5-FU 顺铂放化疗用于不可切除局部晚期食管鳞癌的多中心 II 期研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Apr 20;20(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06716-5.
7
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin/5-fluorouracil is associated with increased pathologic complete response and improved survival compared to carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.对于局部晚期食管癌患者,与顺铂/紫杉醇联合治疗相比,新辅助放化疗联合顺铂/5-氟尿嘧啶可提高病理完全缓解率并改善生存率。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jul 1;30(7):1-7. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox015.
8
Tolerability and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy comparing carboplatin/paclitaxel versus platinum/5-FU regimen for locally advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers.顺铂/紫杉醇与铂/5-氟尿嘧啶方案同步放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌和食管胃交界癌的耐受性和疗效比较
Med Oncol. 2017 Sep;34(9):157. doi: 10.1007/s12032-017-1017-z. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
9
Comparing Paclitaxel Plus Fluorouracil Versus Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil in Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Trial.紫杉醇联合氟尿嘧啶对比顺铂联合氟尿嘧啶用于局部晚期食管鳞癌放化疗的随机、多中心、III 期临床研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 10;37(20):1695-1703. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02122. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
10
Capecitabine or Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Versus Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin in Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (CRTCOESC): A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial.卡培他滨或卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂对比氟尿嘧啶联合顺铂用于局部晚期食管鳞癌同期放化疗(CRTCOESC):一项多中心、随机、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 10;42(20):2436-2445. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02009. Epub 2024 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of Response to Chemoradiotherapy by Dynamic Changes of Circulating Exosome Levels in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.动态监测循环外泌体水平预测食管鳞癌患者放化疗反应。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2024 Feb 9;19:1351-1362. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S440684. eCollection 2024.
2
Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.卡瑞利珠单抗联合化疗新辅助治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 May 9;23(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02023-5.
3
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Taxanes Plus Platinum and Fluorouracil Plus Platinum in the First-Line Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.纳武利尤单抗对比化疗用于既往化疗后进展或不耐受的晚期食管鳞癌患者(ATTRACTION-3):一项多中心、随机、开放标签、III 期临床研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1506-1517. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30626-6. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
2
The emerging role of immunotherapy for esophageal cancer.免疫疗法在食管癌中的新作用。
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;35(4):337-343. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000542.
3
Cancer statistics, 2019.
紫杉类药物联合铂类与氟尿嘧啶联合铂类治疗食管癌一线治疗的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Sep 16;29(9):6610-6627. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29090519.
癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
4
Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods.估算 2018 年全球癌症发病率和死亡率:GLOBOCAN 来源和方法。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
5
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial.新辅助化疗与新辅助放化疗治疗食管或胃食管交界处癌:一项随机临床试验的长期结果。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Feb 1;32(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy078.
6
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil Improves Survival of Patients with Advanced Esophageal Cancer Compared with Conventional Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil.与顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶的传统同步放化疗相比,多西他赛、顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶同步放化疗可提高晚期食管癌患者的生存率。
J Cancer. 2018 Jul 16;9(16):2765-2772. doi: 10.7150/jca.23456. eCollection 2018.
7
Comparison of definite chemoradiation therapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/5-fluoruracil in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.比较卡铂/紫杉醇或顺铂/5-氟尿嘧啶在食管鳞状细胞癌患者中的确定性放化疗效果。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Aug 2;13(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1085-z.
8
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiation with carboplatin/ paclitaxel or cisplatin/ 5-fluoruracil in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.比较新辅助放化疗联合卡铂/紫杉醇或顺铂/ 5-氟尿嘧啶治疗食管鳞癌的疗效。
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov 21;12(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0904-y.
9
Shifting practice in definitive chemoradiation for localized esophageal cancer.局部食管癌确定性放化疗的实践转变
Curr Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(5):e379-e387. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3677. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
10
Feasibility and efficiency of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin versus radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of two centers.卡培他滨和顺铂同期放化疗与单纯放疗治疗局部晚期老年食管鳞癌的可行性和效率:两个中心的经验。
Thorac Cancer. 2018 Jan;9(1):59-65. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12536. Epub 2017 Oct 12.