• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FDA 从 1906 年至今的设备监管

FDA Device Oversight From 1906 to the Present.

机构信息

Third-year medical student at the Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Adjunct faculty member in the Arizona State University (ASU) College of Health Solutions and an affiliated scholar in ASU's Center for Healthcare Delivery and Policy in Phoenix.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2021 Sep 1;23(9):E712-720. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.712.

DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2021.712
PMID:34710032
Abstract

This article examines the history of device oversight by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Significant regulatory changes occurred in response to injuries caused by Dalkon Shield intrauterine devices. This article summarizes those changes as well as continued efforts by the FDA to strengthen device oversight and address areas of concern.

摘要

本文考察了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)对设备监管的历史。达金盾宫内节育器导致的伤害引发了重大监管变革。本文总结了这些变革,以及 FDA 为加强设备监管和解决关注领域所做的持续努力。

相似文献

1
FDA Device Oversight From 1906 to the Present.FDA 从 1906 年至今的设备监管
AMA J Ethics. 2021 Sep 1;23(9):E712-720. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.712.
2
The Dalkon Shield.达康盾节育环
FDA Consum. 1975 Feb;9(1):21.
3
An association between the Dalkon Shield and complicated pregnancies among women hospitalized for intrauterine contraceptive device--related disorders.在因宫内节育器相关疾病住院的女性中,达康盾与复杂妊娠之间的关联。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 May 1;125(1):83-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90897-8.
4
The Dalkon Shield in perspective.透视下的达康盾节育环。 (注:“Dalkon Shield”是一种曾在市场上出现过的节育环品牌,该名称具体翻译可能因行业习惯等有不同,这里给出一种常见理解。)
Med Law. 1986;5(1):35-44.
5
The Dalkon Shield saga.达康盾事件
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2003 Jan;29(1):8. doi: 10.1783/147118903101197151.
6
The Dalkon shield story.达康盾节育器事件
Adv Plan Parent. 1976;11(2):53-63.
7
Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings.“达康盾”宫内节育器是一种安全有效的节育器吗?病例对照研究结果与临床试验研究结果之间的冲突。
Fertil Steril. 1992 Jun;57(6):1151-76. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55068-7.
8
Medical records in litigation: the Dalkon Shield story.诉讼中的医疗记录:达康盾节育器事件
AMRO. 1992 Feb;32(5):11-4.
9
Dalkon shield affair: a bad lesson in science and decision-making.达康盾事件:科学与决策方面的一个惨痛教训。
Science. 1974 Sep 6;185(4154):839-41. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4154.839.
10
The Dalkon shield: tale of a tall.达康盾:一个荒诞不经的故事。 (原英文表述似乎有误,推测正确表述可能是The Dalkon Shield: tale of a tall tale ,直译为“达康盾:一个荒诞不经的故事” ,这里根据提供的错误英文进行了翻译 )
Fam Plann Perspect. 1974 Fall;6(4):198-201.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation and Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Medical Devices for Clinical Decision Support.用于临床决策支持的人工智能医疗设备的评估与监管
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2025 Aug;8(1):81-99. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-103123-095824. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
2
Review of approvals and recalls of US specific medical devices in general and plastic surgery.美国特定医疗器械在一般领域及整形外科领域的批准与召回情况综述。
Surg Pract Sci. 2023 Feb 15;12:100158. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100158. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Risk of Recall Associated With Modifications to High-risk Medical Devices Approved Through US Food and Drug Administration Supplements.
高风险医疗器械通过美国食品和药物管理局补充批准进行修改相关的召回风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e237699. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7699.