Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2022 Mar;47(3):261-268. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2021-0243. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
This study evaluated if passive controlled hyperthermia heat acclimation modulates cognitive performance during passive heat stress. Eight healthy adults (25 ± 4 years) underwent 7 consecutive days of hot water immersion (core temperature ≥38.6 °C) and a 7-day time-control period. On days 1 and 7 of heat acclimation, participants performed a digital Stroop test at baseline, when core temperature reached 38.6 °C, and after 60 minutes at a core temperature ≥38.6 °C to evaluate reaction time during tasks targeting processing speed (reading and counting) and executive functions (inhibition and switching). On days 1 and 7 of the time-control intervention, participants performed the Stroop test with equivalent amounts of time separating each task as for heat acclimation. During day 1 of heat acclimation, reaction time was quicker during the reading (-44 ms [-71 to -17], < 0.01) and counting (-39 ms [-76 to -2], = 0.04) tasks when the rectal temperature reached 38.6 °C, but after a further 60 minutes of heat exposure, reaction time only remained quicker during the reading task (-56 ms [-83 to -29], < 0.01). Changes in reaction time during heat exposure were unaffected by subsequent heat acclimation (interaction, all ≥ 0.09). In conclusion, 7 days of heat acclimation does not modulate processing speed and executive functions during passive heat exposure. Whether heat acclimation improves cognitive performance during heat exposure remains unclear. We tested the hypothesis that heat acclimation modulates reaction time during cognitive tasks performed at matched levels of thermal strain. Despite the classical signs of heat acclimation, reaction time during heat exposure is unaffected by heat acclimation.
本研究评估了被动控制的热适应是否会调节在被动热应激期间的认知表现。8 名健康成年人(25±4 岁)接受了连续 7 天的热水浸泡(核心温度≥38.6°C)和 7 天的时间对照期。在热适应的第 1 天和第 7 天,参与者在基线时、核心温度达到 38.6°C 时以及在核心温度≥38.6°C 下 60 分钟后进行数字斯特鲁普测试,以评估针对处理速度(阅读和计数)和执行功能(抑制和转换)的任务中的反应时间。在时间对照干预的第 1 天和第 7 天,参与者在与热适应相同的时间间隔内进行斯特鲁普测试。在热适应的第 1 天,当直肠温度达到 38.6°C 时,阅读(-44 毫秒[-71 至-17],<0.01)和计数(-39 毫秒[-76 至-2],=0.04)任务的反应时间更快,但在进一步的 60 分钟热暴露后,只有阅读任务的反应时间仍然更快(-56 毫秒[-83 至-29],<0.01)。在热暴露期间反应时间的变化不受随后的热适应影响(所有交互作用,均≥0.09)。总之,7 天的热适应不会调节在被动热暴露期间的处理速度和执行功能。热适应是否能改善在热暴露期间的认知表现尚不清楚。我们测试了热适应是否会调节在热暴露期间执行的认知任务的反应时间的假设。尽管存在热适应的典型迹象,但热适应对热暴露期间的反应时间没有影响。