Solomon Thomas P J, Laye Matthew J
Blazon Scientific, London, SW20 8DA, UK.
Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, 1401 E. Central Dr, Meridian, ID, 83642, USA.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Jan 6;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-01038-6.
"Active" heat acclimation (exercise-in-the-heat) can improve exercise performance but the efficacy of "passive" heat acclimation using post-exercise heat exposure is unclear. Therefore, we synthesised a systematic review and meta-analysis to answer whether post-exercise heat exposure improves exercise performance.
Five databases were searched to identify studies including: (i) healthy adults; (ii) an exercise training intervention with post-exercise heat exposure via sauna or hot water immersion (treatment group); (iii) a non-heat exposure control group completing the same training; and (iv) outcomes measuring exercise performance in the heat (primary outcome), or performance in thermoneutral conditions, V̇Omax, lactate threshold, economy, heart rate, RPE, core temperature, sweat rate, and thermal sensations. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. To determine the effect of post-exercise heat exposure, between-group ratio of means or standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated for each outcome and weighted by the inverse of their variance to calculate an overall effect estimate (ratio of mean or Hedges'g) in a random effects meta-analysis, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals (PI). Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.
Ten studies (199 participants: 156 male, 43 female, age 20-32 years) were included. The effect of post-exercise heat exposure on performance in hot conditions (33-40 °C) was trivial (ratio of means = 1.04) with poor precision (95%CI 0.94-1.15, P = 0.46) and low predictive certainty (95%PI 0.81-1.33). There were also trivial effects on performance in thermoneutral conditions (18-24 °C) and speed at lactate threshold, small effects on V̇Omax, heart rate, core temperature, and sweat rate, and a moderate effect on thermal sensations. However, the certainty in the effect estimates was graded as low to very low across all outcomes due to small sample sizes, high risk of bias, risk of publication bias, imprecision in the effect estimates, and low statistical power.
The use of post-exercise heat exposure for improving exercise performance is uncertain. Further high-quality trials are needed to make firm conclusions.
Open Science Foundation ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/256XZ ).
“主动”热适应(热环境中运动)可提高运动表现,但运动后热暴露这种“被动”热适应的效果尚不清楚。因此,我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以回答运动后热暴露是否能提高运动表现。
检索了五个数据库,以确定纳入的研究包括:(i)健康成年人;(ii)通过桑拿或热水浸泡进行运动后热暴露的运动训练干预(治疗组);(iii)完成相同训练的非热暴露对照组;(iv)测量热环境中运动表现(主要结局)或热中性条件下表现、最大摄氧量、乳酸阈值、经济性、心率、主观用力程度分级、核心温度、出汗率和热感觉的结局指标。使用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具评估研究质量。为确定运动后热暴露的效果,对每个结局指标计算组间均值比或标准化均值差(SMD),并通过其方差的倒数加权,以在随机效应荟萃分析中计算总体效应估计值(均值比或Hedges' g),并给出95%置信区间(CI)和预测区间(PI)。使用推荐分级的评估、制定和评价(GRADE)工具评估证据质量。
纳入了10项研究(199名参与者:156名男性,43名女性,年龄20 - 32岁)。运动后热暴露对高温环境(33 - 40°C)下表现的影响微不足道(均值比 = 1.04),精度较差(95%CI 0.94 - 1.15,P = 0.46)且预测确定性较低(95%PI 0.81 - 1.33)。对热中性条件(18 - 24°C)下的表现以及乳酸阈值时的速度也有微不足道的影响,对最大摄氧量、心率、核心温度和出汗率有较小影响,对热感觉有中等影响。然而,由于样本量小、偏倚风险高、发表偏倚风险、效应估计不精确以及统计功效低,所有结局指标的效应估计确定性被评为低至极低。
运动后热暴露用于提高运动表现的效果尚不确定。需要进一步的高质量试验才能得出确凿结论。