Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Mar 1;112(3):590-599. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.10.011. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
The Anatomy and Radiology Contouring (ARC) Bootcamp was a face-to-face (F2F) intervention providing integrated education for radiation oncology (RO) residents and medical physicists. To increase access, we launched an online offering in 2019. We evaluated the effect of the online course on participants' knowledge acquisition, contouring skills, and self-confidence by comparing it with the F2F course.
Using modules, the online course offers content similar to that of the F2F comparator. Participants from the 2019 F2F and the 2019-2020 online course completed pre- and postevaluations assessing anatomy and radiology knowledge, contouring skills, self-confidence, and course satisfaction.
There were 180 individuals enrolled (F2F: n = 40; online: n = 140); 57 participants (F2F: n = 30; online: n = 27) completed both evaluations. The online course had a wider geographic participation (19 countries) than F2F (4 countries). F2F had primarily RO resident participation (80%), compared with online (41%). Both cohorts demonstrated similar improvements in self-confidence pertaining to anatomy and radiology knowledge, contouring skills, and interpreting radiology images (all P < .001). Both the online (mean ± SD improvement: 6.6 ± 6.7 on a 40-point scale; P < .001) and F2F (3.7 ± 5.7; P = .002) groups showed anatomy and radiology knowledge improvement. Only the F2F group demonstrated improvement with the contouring assessment (F2F: 0.10 ± 0.17 on a 1-point Dice scale; P = .004; online: 0.07 ± 0.16; P = .076). Both cohorts perceived the course as a positive experience (F2F: 4.8 ± 0.4 on a 5-point scale; online: 4.5 ± 0.6), stated it would improve their professional practice (F2F: 4.6 ± 0.5; online: 4.2 ± 0.8), and said they would recommend it to others (F2F: 4.8 ± 0.4; online: 4.4 ± 0.6).
The online ARC Bootcamp demonstrated improved self-confidence, knowledge scores, and high satisfaction levels among participants. The offering had lower completion rates but was more accessible to geographic regions, provided a flexible learning experience, and allowed for ongoing education during the COVID-19 pandemic.
解剖学和放射学轮廓(ARC)训练营是一个面对面(F2F)干预措施,为放射肿瘤学(RO)住院医师和医学物理学家提供综合教育。为了增加参与度,我们于 2019 年推出了在线课程。我们通过将在线课程与 F2F 课程进行比较,评估了在线课程对参与者知识获取、轮廓技能和自信心的影响。
使用模块,在线课程提供与 F2F 比较器相似的内容。2019 年 F2F 和 2019-2020 年在线课程的参与者完成了预评估和后评估,评估内容包括解剖学和放射学知识、轮廓技能、自信心和课程满意度。
共有 180 人报名(F2F:n=40;在线:n=140);57 名参与者(F2F:n=30;在线:n=27)完成了两次评估。在线课程的地理参与范围比 F2F 更广(19 个国家)(4 个国家)。F2F 主要由 RO 住院医师参与(80%),而在线课程则较少(41%)。两个队列在与解剖学和放射学知识、轮廓技能和解释放射图像相关的自信心方面都表现出类似的提高(均 P<0.001)。在线(平均±SD 提高:40 分制上提高 6.6±6.7 分;P<0.001)和 F2F(3.7±5.7;P=0.002)组都显示出解剖学和放射学知识的提高。只有 F2F 组在轮廓评估中表现出改善(F2F:Dice 评分上提高 0.10±0.17 分;P=0.004;在线:0.07±0.16;P=0.076)。两个队列都认为课程是一次积极的体验(F2F:5 分制上 4.8±0.4;在线:4.5±0.6),表示课程将提高他们的专业实践水平(F2F:4.6±0.5;在线:4.2±0.8),并表示他们将向他人推荐(F2F:4.8±0.4;在线:4.4±0.6)。
在线 ARC 训练营显示出参与者的自信心、知识得分和满意度均有所提高。在线课程的完成率较低,但可访问性更高,提供了灵活的学习体验,并允许在 COVID-19 大流行期间进行持续教育。