Department of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University Tehran, Tehran, Po box: 1983969411, Iran.
Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Dec;144:269-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.10.034. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
and purpose of the study: Individuals with general anxiety disorder (GAD) have deficits in emotional and cognitive processing, including cognitive bias, which plays a causal role in anxiety. Hyperactivity of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is assumed to be involved in cognitive bias. We aimed to explore the causal contribution of the dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortices (dlPFC, vmPFC) on cognitive bias via non-invasive brain stimulation, and expected a bias-reducing effect of cortical activity enhancement over these areas in GAD, with a larger contribution of the vmPFC to perceptual, and of the dlPFC to interpretation bias.
The study was conducted in a randomized, single-blinded, and complete crossover design. Thirty-four adults with GAD, received transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in 5 separate sessions (1.5 mA, 20 min) with the following electrode montages: anodal dlPFC/cathodal vmPFC, anodal vmPFC/cathodal dlPFC, anodal dlPFC/cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC/cathodal left shoulder, and sham stimulation. During stimulation, in each session, participants performed the Dot-Probe and Reading Mind from Eyes tests to measure attention and interpretation biases.
A significant effect of stimulation condition on attention and interpretation biases was observed. Anodal vmPFC and dlPFC stimulation coupled with an extracranial cathodal electrode reduced attention bias to threat-related stimuli in the dot-probe test. Furthermore, anodal dlPFC/cathodal vmPFC stimulation reduced negative interpretation bias in reading from eyes test.
As suggested by the results of this study, both dlPFC and vmPFC are involved in cognitive bias in GAD, but with partially different roles. Anodal stimulation over the right vmPFC and the left dlPFC reduced attention bias, supporting the relevance of these areas for attention bias. For interpretation bias, the significant effect of anodal dlPFC/cathodal vmPFC stimulation, but only trendwise effect of anodal tDCS over the dlPFC combined with an extracephalic return electrode is in accordance with a predominant effect of the dlPFC on interpretation bias, but does not rule out an additional minor involvement of the vmPFC. Based on these results, a new model is suggested for the neural underpinnings of anxiety symptoms.
广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)患者在情绪和认知加工方面存在缺陷,包括认知偏差,而认知偏差在焦虑中起着因果作用。腹内侧前额叶皮层(vmPFC)和背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)的过度活跃被认为与认知偏差有关。我们旨在通过非侵入性脑刺激来探索背外侧和腹内侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC、vmPFC)对认知偏差的因果贡献,并期望在 GAD 中增强这些区域的皮层活动会产生降低偏差的效果,vmPFC 对感知的贡献更大,dlPFC 对解释的偏见更大。
该研究采用随机、单盲、完全交叉设计进行。34 名 GAD 成人在 5 个单独的疗程中接受经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)(1.5 mA,20 分钟),电极布置如下:阳极 dlPFC/阴极 vmPFC、阳极 vmPFC/阴极 dlPFC、阳极 dlPFC/阴极右肩、阳极 vmPFC/阴极左肩和假刺激。在刺激过程中,在每个疗程中,参与者进行点探测和从眼睛阅读思维测试,以测量注意力和解释偏差。
刺激条件对注意力和解释偏差有显著影响。vmPFC 和 dlPFC 的阳极刺激与颅外阴极电极相结合,减少了 dot-probe 测试中对威胁相关刺激的注意力偏差。此外,dlPFC/anodal vmPFC 刺激减少了从眼睛阅读测试中的负面解释偏差。
正如这项研究的结果所表明的那样,dlPFC 和 vmPFC 都参与了 GAD 的认知偏差,但作用部分不同。右 vmPFC 和左 dlPFC 的阳极刺激减少了注意力偏差,支持这些区域与注意力偏差相关。对于解释偏差,anodal dlPFC/cathodal vmPFC 刺激的显著效果,而仅阳极 tDCS 对 dlPFC 与颅外返回电极相结合的趋势性效果,与 dlPFC 对解释偏差的主要影响一致,但不能排除 vmPFC 的额外次要参与。基于这些结果,提出了一个新的焦虑症状的神经基础模型。