• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知负荷与性别特异性人格特质。

Perceptual Load and Sex-Specific Personality Traits.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bremen University, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Germany.

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2021 May;68(3):149-164. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000520.

DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000520
PMID:34711075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8691178/
Abstract

The impact of sex-specific personality traits has often been investigated for visuospatial tasks such as mental rotation, but less is known about the influence of personality traits on visual search. We investigated whether the Big Five personality traits Extroversion (E), Openness (O), Agreeableness (A), Conscientiousness (C), and Neuroticism (N) and the Autism Quotient (AQ) influence visual search in a sample of = 65 men and women. In three experiments, we varied stimulus complexity and predictability. As expected, latencies were longer when the target was absent. Pop-out search was faster than conjunction search. A large number of distracters slowed down reaction times (RTs). When stimulus complexity was not predictable in Experiment 3, this reduced search accuracy by about half. As could be predicted based on previous research on long RT tails, conjunction search in target absent trials revealed the impact of personality traits. The RT effect in visual search of the accelerating "less social" AQ score was specific to men, while the effects of the "more social" decelerating Big Five Inventory factors agreeableness and conscientiousness were specific to women. Thus, sex-specific personality traits could explain decision-making thresholds, while visual stimulus complexity yielded an impact of the classic personality traits neuroticism and extroversion.

摘要

性别特定人格特质的影响经常在心理旋转等空间视觉任务中被研究,但关于人格特质对视觉搜索的影响知之甚少。我们调查了大五人格特质(外向性、开放性、宜人性、尽责性和神经质)和自闭症量表(AQ)是否以及如何影响 65 名男性和女性样本的视觉搜索。在三个实验中,我们改变了刺激的复杂性和可预测性。正如预期的那样,当目标不存在时,潜伏期会更长。突显搜索比结合搜索更快。大量干扰项会减慢反应时间(RT)。当实验 3 中刺激的复杂性不可预测时,这会将搜索准确性降低约一半。根据先前关于长 RT 尾巴的研究可以预测,在目标不存在的试验中进行结合搜索会显示出人格特质的影响。在视觉搜索中,加速的“不太社交”的 AQ 分数的 RT 效应是特定于男性的,而“更社交”的减速大五人格特质宜人性和尽责性的影响则是特定于女性的。因此,性别特定的人格特质可以解释决策阈值,而视觉刺激的复杂性则会产生经典人格特质神经质和外向性的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5000/8691178/a850a0329a09/zea_68_3_149_fig5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5000/8691178/b040de392513/zea_68_3_149_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5000/8691178/2deacade9448/zea_68_3_149_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5000/8691178/903fd1aa096f/zea_68_3_149_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5000/8691178/a26571a42e3c/zea_68_3_149_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5000/8691178/a850a0329a09/zea_68_3_149_fig5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5000/8691178/b040de392513/zea_68_3_149_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5000/8691178/2deacade9448/zea_68_3_149_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5000/8691178/903fd1aa096f/zea_68_3_149_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5000/8691178/a26571a42e3c/zea_68_3_149_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5000/8691178/a850a0329a09/zea_68_3_149_fig5a.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptual Load and Sex-Specific Personality Traits.感知负荷与性别特异性人格特质。
Exp Psychol. 2021 May;68(3):149-164. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000520.
2
Personality traits, emotional intelligence and decision-making styles in Lebanese universities medical students.黎巴嫩大学医学生的人格特质、情绪智力和决策风格。
BMC Psychol. 2020 May 5;8(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00406-4.
3
[Big five personality factors related to face recognition].[与面部识别相关的大五人格因素]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2005 Feb;75(6):517-22. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.75.517.
4
Big five personality traits of medical students and workplace performance in the final clerkship year using an EPA framework.医学生的五大人格特质与最终实习年的工作表现,采用 EPA 框架。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05434-x.
5
Social anxiety and the Big Five personality traits: the interactive relationship of trust and openness.社交焦虑与大五人格特质:信任与开放性的交互关系。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(3):212-22. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1008032. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
6
Long-term stability in the Big Five personality traits in adulthood.成年期大五人格特质的长期稳定性。
Scand J Psychol. 2007 Dec;48(6):511-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00609.x.
7
The associations between religiosity and the Big-Five personality traits in college students from Sudan.苏丹大学生宗教信仰与大五人格特质的关联。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Sep;239:104013. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104013. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
8
The mediating effect of perceived stress on the relationship between big five personality traits and suboptimal health status in Chinese population: a nationwide survey in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.感知压力在中国人群大五人格特质与亚健康状态关系中的中介作用:基于预测、预防和个性化医学框架的全国性调查
EPMA J. 2023 Dec 11;15(1):25-38. doi: 10.1007/s13167-023-00349-x. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
The impact of intimate partner violence on depressive symptoms among college students: A moderated mediation model of the big five personality traits and perceived social support.亲密伴侣暴力对大学生抑郁症状的影响:大五人格特质与感知社会支持的调节中介模型
J Affect Disord. 2024 Apr 1;350:203-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.096. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
10
Personality traits and body mass index in a Korean population.韩国人群的人格特质与体重指数
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 5;9(3):e90516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090516. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Could social support mediate the relationship between personality trait patterns and mental health in Chinese older adults: a nationwide cross-sectional study conducted in 2022.社会支持能否调节中国老年人的人格特质模式与心理健康之间的关系:2022年开展的一项全国性横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):1479. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22449-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Empathy and its associations with age and sociodemographic characteristics in a large UK population sample.在一个大型英国人群样本中,同理心及其与年龄和社会人口特征的关联。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 20;16(9):e0257557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257557. eCollection 2021.
2
Magnitude of sex differences in visual search varies with target eccentricity.性别差异在视觉搜索中的大小随目标偏心率而变化。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):178-188. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01796-7.
3
Parents' Autistic Personality Traits and Sex-Biased Family Ratio Determine the Amount of Technical Toy Choice.
父母的自闭症人格特质和性别偏向的家庭比例决定了技术类玩具的选择量。
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 20;10:2101. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02101. eCollection 2019.
4
The Role of Latency and Task Complexity in Predicting Visual Search Behavior.潜伏期和任务复杂性在预测视觉搜索行为中的作用。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2020 Jan;26(1):1246-1255. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934556. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
5
The development of gender differences in spatial reasoning: A meta-analytic review.性别差异在空间推理发展中的研究:元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Jun;145(6):537-565. doi: 10.1037/bul0000191. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
6
Bottom-up attention capture with distractor and target singletons defined in the same (color) dimension is not a matter of feature uncertainty.在相同(颜色)维度中定义的干扰项和目标单独元素所引发的自下而上的注意捕获,并非特征不确定性的问题。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1350-1361. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1538-3.
7
Ability and sex differences in spatial thinking: What does the mental rotation test really measure?能力和性别差异在空间思维中的表现:心理旋转测试到底测量了什么?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):1212-1219. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1347-z.
8
People With Autism Spectrum Conditions Make More Consistent Decisions.患有自闭症谱系障碍的人做决策更具一致性。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Aug;28(8):1067-1076. doi: 10.1177/0956797617694867. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
9
The wisdom of crowds for visual search.众包在视觉搜索中的应用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 23;114(21):E4306-E4315. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610732114. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance.个体差异预示着低患病率视觉搜索表现。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41235-016-0042-3. Epub 2017 Jan 30.