• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当医生在与患者的互动中提供复杂信息时,有三种策略:如何识别和衡量它们。

Three strategies when physicians provide complex information in interactions with patients: How to recognize and measure them.

机构信息

Health Services Research Unit HØKH, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway; Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway; University of Oslo, Norway.

Health Services Research Unit HØKH, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jun;105(6):1552-1560. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.013
PMID:34711445
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To define and operationalize three taught strategies for providing information in interactions with patients using videos collected in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS

This was a qualitative exploratory study embedded in a randomized controlled design, using microanalysis of face-to-face dialogue as an inductive video analysis method to operationalize physicians' use of three information-provision strategies. Data were 34 video-recorded simulated (but unscripted) interactions between 17 physicians and 34 multiple sclerosis patients collected before and after a brief course on information provision. We operationalized (1) mapping the patient's preferences and (2) checking the patient's understanding, and pauses indicative of (3) portioning information.

RESULTS

Results are detailed analytical definitions, criteria, and assessable, quantifiable outcomes for each of the three strategies. Patients responded to portioning pauses as expected: whereas 91% of these pauses elicited an immediate patient response, only 23% of non-portioning pauses did so.

CONCLUSION

Our methods revealed how to define and evaluate information sharing strategies physicians used within the contingencies of clinical interaction.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Findings provide applicable methods to teach, analyze, and evaluate information sharing strategies and indications for further training.

摘要

目的

利用从随机对照试验(RCT)中收集的视频,定义和操作三种在与患者互动时提供信息的教学策略。

方法

这是一项嵌入随机对照设计的定性探索性研究,使用面对面对话的微观分析作为一种归纳性视频分析方法,将医生使用的三种信息提供策略操作化。数据来自 17 名医生和 34 名多发性硬化症患者之间 34 次预先录制的模拟(但未脚本化)互动,这些互动是在简短的信息提供课程之前和之后收集的。我们操作化了(1)绘制患者偏好,(2)检查患者理解,以及(3)划分信息的停顿。

结果

结果是对三种策略中的每一种策略的详细分析定义、标准和可评估、可量化的结果。患者对划分停顿的反应如预期:91%的停顿会引起患者立即回应,而非划分停顿只有 23%会引起回应。

结论

我们的方法揭示了如何在临床互动的情况下定义和评估医生使用的信息共享策略。

实践意义

研究结果提供了适用于教授、分析和评估信息共享策略以及进一步培训的方法。

相似文献

1
Three strategies when physicians provide complex information in interactions with patients: How to recognize and measure them.当医生在与患者的互动中提供复杂信息时,有三种策略:如何识别和衡量它们。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jun;105(6):1552-1560. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
2
Physicians' responses to advanced cancer patients' existential concerns: A video-based analysis.医生对晚期癌症患者存在问题的反应:基于视频的分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Oct;105(10):3062-3070. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
3
Communicative challenges among physicians, patients, and family caregivers in cancer care: An exploratory qualitative study in Ethiopia.癌症护理中医生、患者和家庭照顾者之间的沟通挑战:在埃塞俄比亚进行的探索性定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 13;15(3):e0230309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230309. eCollection 2020.
4
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
5
Patients' and physicians' understanding of health and biomedical concepts: relationship to the design of EMR systems.患者与医生对健康及生物医学概念的理解:与电子病历系统设计的关系。
J Biomed Inform. 2002 Feb;35(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/s1532-0464(02)00002-3.
6
Effects of communication training with the MAAS-Global-D instrument on the antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections in primary care: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.使用MAAS全球版工具进行沟通培训对基层医疗中呼吸道感染抗生素处方的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Apr 2;17:180. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1293-5.
7
Work system factors influencing physicians' screen sharing behaviors in primary care encounters.影响基层医疗问诊中医师屏幕共享行为的工作系统因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):791-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 23.
8
Adherence communication: a qualitative analysis of physician-patient dialogue.依从性沟通:医患对话的质性分析
AIDS. 1999 Sep 10;13(13):1771-8. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199909100-00022.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Strategies for managing uncertainty and complexity.应对不确定性和复杂性的策略。
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Aug;11(8):481-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02599044.

引用本文的文献

1
How do doctors address heart failure patients' disclosures of medication adherence problems during hospital and primary care consultations? An exploratory interaction-based observational cohort study.在医院和初级保健会诊期间,医生如何应对心力衰竭患者所披露的用药依从性问题?一项基于互动的探索性观察队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 14;15(4):e098826. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098826.
2
What do patients with heart failure disclose about medication adherence at home to their hospital and primary care doctors? Exploratory interaction-based observational cohort study.心力衰竭患者在家中对其医院医生和初级保健医生透露了哪些关于药物依从性的信息?基于探索性互动的观察性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 7;14(8):e086440. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086440.
3
How do hospital providers perceive and experience the information-delivery process? A qualitative exploratory study.
医院提供者如何看待和体验信息传递过程?一项定性探索性研究。
PEC Innov. 2023 Oct 1;3:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100222. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
4
Training physicians in providing complex information to patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial.培训医生向多发性硬化症患者提供复杂信息:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 15;12(3):e049817. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049817.