• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心力衰竭患者在家中对其医院医生和初级保健医生透露了哪些关于药物依从性的信息?基于探索性互动的观察性队列研究。

What do patients with heart failure disclose about medication adherence at home to their hospital and primary care doctors? Exploratory interaction-based observational cohort study.

作者信息

Frigaard Christine, Menichetti Julia, Schirmer Henrik, Bjørnstad Herman, Breines Simonsen Tone, Wisløff Torbjørn, Gulbrandsen Pål, Gerwing Jennifer

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway

Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 7;14(8):e086440. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086440.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086440
PMID:39117414
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11404216/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study was twofold: to investigate what kind of information patients with heart failure (HF) tell their doctors about their medication adherence at home, and how often such information is provided in consultations where medication reconciliation is recommended. To meet these objectives, we developed an analysis to recognise, define, and count (1) patient utterances including medication adherence disclosures in clinical interactions (MADICI), (2) MADICI including red-flags for non-adherence, and (3) MADICI initiated by patients without prompts from their doctor.

DESIGN

Exploratory interaction-based observational cohort study. Inductive microanalysis of authentic patient-doctor consultations, audio-recorded at three time-points for each patient: (1) first ward visit in hospital, (2) discharge visit from hospital, and (3) follow-up visit with general practitioner (GP).

SETTING

Norway (2022-2023).

PARTICIPANTS

25 patients with HF (+65 years) and their attending doctors (23 hospital doctors, 25 GPs).

RESULTS

We recognised MADICI by two criteria: (1) they are about medication prescribed for use at home, AND (2) they involve patients' action, experience, or stance regarding medications. Using these criteria, we identified 427 MADICIs in 25 patient trajectories: 143 (34%) at first ward visit (min-max=0-35, median=3), 57 (13%) at discharge visit (min-max=0-8, median=2), 227 (53%) at GP-visit (min-max=2-24, median=7). Of 427 MADICIs, 235 (55%) included red-flags for non-adherence. Bumetanide and atorvastatin were most frequently mentioned as problematic. Patients initiated 146 (34%) of 427 MADICIs. Of 235 'red-flag MADICIs', 101 (43%) were initiated by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-managing older patients with HF disclosed information about their use of medications at home, often including red-flags for non-adherence. Patients who disclosed information that signals adherence problems tended to do so unprompted. Such disclosures generate opportunities for doctors to assess and support patients' medication adherence at home.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的有两个:一是调查心力衰竭(HF)患者在家中向医生告知其用药依从性的信息类型,二是在建议进行用药核对的会诊中,此类信息的提供频率。为实现这些目标,我们开展了一项分析,以识别、定义和统计:(1)临床互动中包括用药依从性披露的患者话语(MADICI),(2)包括不依从警示信号的MADICI,以及(3)患者在未得到医生提示的情况下主动提及的MADICI。

设计

基于探索性互动的观察性队列研究。对真实的医患会诊进行归纳性微观分析,每个患者在三个时间点进行录音:(1)首次住院病房就诊,(2)出院就诊,以及(3)全科医生(GP)随访就诊。

地点

挪威(2022 - 2023年)。

参与者

25名65岁及以上的HF患者及其主治医生(23名医院医生,25名全科医生)。

结果

我们通过两个标准识别MADICI:(1)它们是关于在家中使用的处方药,并且(2)它们涉及患者对药物的行动、经验或态度。使用这些标准,我们在25条患者病程中识别出427条MADICI:首次病房就诊时143条(34%)(最小 - 最大 = 0 - 35,中位数 = 3),出院就诊时57条(13%)(最小 - 最大 = 0 - 8,中位数 = 2),全科医生随访就诊时227条(53%)(最小 - 最大 = 2 - 24,中位数 = 7)。在427条MADICI中,235条(55%)包括不依从警示信号。布美他尼和阿托伐他汀被提及为问题最多的药物。患者主动提及了427条MADICI中的146条(34%)。在235条“警示信号MADICI”中,101条(43%)是由患者主动提及的。

结论

自我管理的老年HF患者披露了他们在家中用药的信息,通常包括不依从警示信号。披露表明存在依从性问题信息的患者往往是在未得到提示的情况下这样做的。此类披露为医生提供了在家中评估和支持患者用药依从性的机会。

相似文献

1
What do patients with heart failure disclose about medication adherence at home to their hospital and primary care doctors? Exploratory interaction-based observational cohort study.心力衰竭患者在家中对其医院医生和初级保健医生透露了哪些关于药物依从性的信息?基于探索性互动的观察性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 7;14(8):e086440. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086440.
2
How do doctors address heart failure patients' disclosures of medication adherence problems during hospital and primary care consultations? An exploratory interaction-based observational cohort study.在医院和初级保健会诊期间,医生如何应对心力衰竭患者所披露的用药依从性问题?一项基于互动的探索性观察队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 14;15(4):e098826. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098826.
3
Postdischarge community pharmacist-provided home services for patients after hospitalization for heart failure.心力衰竭患者出院后由社区药剂师提供的家庭服务
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2015 Jul-Aug;55(4):438-42. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2015.14235.
4
Continuity and adherence to long-term drug treatment by geriatric patients after hospital discharge: a prospective cohort study.老年患者出院后长期药物治疗的连续性和依从性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Drugs Aging. 2008;25(10):861-70. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200825100-00005.
5
Awareness of heart failure, blood pressure management and self-efficacy: The Research Goes Red for Women Registry.心力衰竭认知、血压管理与自我效能:女性“穿红为心”注册研究
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241306807. doi: 10.1177/17455057241306807.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Medication Reconciliation at Transition of Care in a Geriatric Primary Care Setting: A Pilot Program.老年初级保健机构中护理转接时的用药核对:一项试点项目
Sr Care Pharm. 2025 May 1;40(5):217-222. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2025.217.
8
Community pharmacy medication review, death and re-admission after hospital discharge: a propensity score-matched cohort study.社区药房药物审查与出院后死亡和再入院:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):41-51. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009545. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
9
[Home visits by a pharmacist after discharge from hospital].[出院后药剂师的家访]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 Feb 28;128(5):567-9.
10
Heart Failure Transitions of Care: A Pharmacist-Led Post-Discharge Pilot Experience.心力衰竭护理过渡:药剂师主导的出院后试点经验。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Sep-Oct;60(2):249-258. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Contextual Factors Affecting Adherence Revealed by Old Patients with Heart Failure in Hospital and Primary Care Interactions: A Descriptive Study.住院及基层医疗互动中影响老年心力衰竭患者依从性的情境因素:一项描述性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Apr 14;19:1075-1087. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S505297. eCollection 2025.
2
How do doctors address heart failure patients' disclosures of medication adherence problems during hospital and primary care consultations? An exploratory interaction-based observational cohort study.在医院和初级保健会诊期间,医生如何应对心力衰竭患者所披露的用药依从性问题?一项基于互动的探索性观察队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 14;15(4):e098826. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098826.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Health Care Communication in Treatment Outcomes.医疗保健沟通在治疗结果中的作用。
Annu Rev Linguist. 2023 Jan;9:233-252. doi: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030521-054400. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
2
2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.2023 年 ESC 急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南的重点更新:由欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断和治疗工作组制定,ESC 心力衰竭协会(HFA)特别贡献。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Jan;26(1):5-17. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3024. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
3
What frail, older patients talk about when they talk about self-care-a qualitative study in heart failure care.虚弱、老年患者在谈及自我护理时会谈论些什么——心力衰竭护理中的定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Dec 7;23(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04538-1.
4
Patient participation during discharge medication counselling: Observing real-life communication between healthcare professionals and patients.患者在出院药物咨询中的参与:观察医护人员与患者之间的真实沟通。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Aug;19(8):1228-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.008. Epub 2023 May 11.
5
Older patient participation in discharge medication communication: an observational study.老年患者参与出院药物沟通:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 23;13(3):e064750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064750.
6
Medication nonadherence: health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions.药物不依从:对健康的影响、流行程度、相关因素和干预措施。
Psychol Health. 2023 Jun;38(6):726-765. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2144923. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
7
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-e421. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
8
Three strategies when physicians provide complex information in interactions with patients: How to recognize and measure them.当医生在与患者的互动中提供复杂信息时,有三种策略:如何识别和衡量它们。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jun;105(6):1552-1560. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
9
Correction to: Polypharmacy definition and prevalence in heart failure: a systematic review.对《心力衰竭中多重用药的定义与患病率:一项系统评价》的更正
Heart Fail Rev. 2022 Mar;27(2):739. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10149-y. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
10
Empowering the patient? Medication communication during hospital discharge: a qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway.赋予患者权力?医院出院时的药物沟通:挪威内科病房的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 30;11(6):e044850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044850.