Huang Ching-Yu, Bull Ray
Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.
Department of Law, Criminology and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UK.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 16;28(2):255-273. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1770634. eCollection 2021.
The purpose of this paper is to systematically examine the research literature on the decision of expert interviewers within the theoretical framework of the Hierarchy of Expert Performance (HEP). After providing an overview of the HEP framework, existing research in the investigative interviewing at each of the eight levels of the HEP framework is reviewed. The results identify areas of strength in (Level 2) and of weakness in (Level 6). Biases in investigative interview experts' decision making is also revealed at (Level 8). Moreover, no published data are available in at the level of (Level 1) or (Level 5), (Level 3 and 4) and (Level 7). The findings highlight areas where future research and practical endeavour are much needed for the investigative interview.
本文的目的是在专家表现层次结构（HEP）的理论框架内，系统地审视关于专家访谈者决策的研究文献。在概述HEP框架之后，对HEP框架八个层次中每个层次的调查性访谈现有研究进行了综述。结果确定了（第2级）的优势领域和（第6级）的薄弱领域。在（第8级）还揭示了调查性访谈专家决策中的偏差。此外，在（第1级）或（第5级）、（第3和4级）以及（第7级）没有公开数据。研究结果突出了调查性访谈未来研究和实际努力急需的领域。
