Amado Bárbara G, Arce Ramón, Fariña Francisca, Vilariño Manuel
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Universidade de Vigo, Spain.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016 May-Aug;16(2):201-210. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
: Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) is the tool most extensively used worldwide for evaluating the veracity of a testimony. CBCA, initially designed for evaluating the testimonies of victims of child sexual abuse, has been empirically validated. Moreover, CBCA has been generalized to adult populations and other contexts though this generalization has not been endorsed by the scientific literature. : Thus, a meta-analysis was performed to assess the Undeutsch Hypothesis and the CBCA checklist of criteria in discerning in adults between memories of self-experienced real-life events and fabricated or fictitious memories. : Though the results corroborated the Undeutsch Hypothesis, and CBCA as a valid technique, the results were not generalizable, and the and criteria failed to discriminate between both memories. The technique can be complemented with additional reality criteria. The study of moderators revealed discriminating efficacy was significantly higher in filed studies on sexual offences and intimate partner violence. : The findings are discussed in terms of their implications as well as the limitations and conditions for applying these results to forensic settings.
基于标准的内容分析（CBCA）是全球范围内用于评估证词真实性的应用最为广泛的工具。CBCA最初设计用于评估儿童性虐待受害者的证词，已得到实证验证。此外，CBCA已被推广应用于成年人群体和其他情境，不过这种推广尚未得到科学文献的认可。因此，进行了一项荟萃分析，以评估温德施假说以及CBCA标准清单在辨别成年人亲身经历的现实生活事件记忆与编造或虚构记忆方面的作用。尽管结果证实了温德施假说以及CBCA作为一种有效技术的有效性，但结果无法推广，并且某些标准未能区分这两种记忆。该技术可以通过额外的现实标准加以补充。调节因素研究表明，在性犯罪和亲密伴侣暴力的实地研究中，辨别效力显著更高。本文从研究结果的影响以及将这些结果应用于法医环境的局限性和条件方面进行了讨论。
