Every-Palmer S, Cunningham R, Jenkins M, Bell E
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 23;28(2):274-285. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1770635. eCollection 2021.
In March 2019, a mass shooting at two Christchurch mosques, livestreamed to Facebook, resulted in the deaths of 51 people. Psychologically, this served as a focusing event with high threat salience, shocking a country unused to gun violence despite its comparatively lax firearm legislation. The unprecedented reluctance by the New Zealand media to feature the shooter as a protagonist or even publish his name, concentrating instead on victims and societal issues, helped promote a sense of collective responsibility for change. This was strongly modeled by political leaders. Within weeks, new gun control laws were introduced with bipartisan support. We present this as a national case study, considering psychological and societal enablers for legislative reform in response to extreme gun violence. The shooting also raised the intractable problem of the internet allowing terrorists to promulgate violent content and extremist ideology with regulation in this area harder to achieve than gun control.
2019年3月,克赖斯特彻奇两座清真寺发生大规模枪击事件,并在脸书上进行了直播,造成51人死亡。从心理层面来看,这是一个具有高度威胁显著性的聚焦事件,震惊了一个尽管枪支立法相对宽松但不习惯枪支暴力的国家。新西兰媒体前所未有的不情愿将枪手作为主角进行报道甚至公布其姓名,而是将重点放在受害者和社会问题上,这有助于促进一种集体变革责任感。政治领导人对此起到了强烈的示范作用。几周内,在两党支持下出台了新的枪支管制法律。我们将此作为一个国家案例研究,探讨应对极端枪支暴力的立法改革的心理和社会推动因素。此次枪击事件还引发了一个棘手的问题,即互联网使恐怖分子能够传播暴力内容和极端主义思想,而在这一领域进行监管比枪支管制更难实现。